Go Back   Maryland Shooters > Gun Rights and Legislation > National 2A Issues

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old August 20th, 2010, 05:32 PM   #1
krucam
Senior Member
 
krucam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: 3rd Rock from the Sun...DFW, TX
Posts: 5,854
Post-McDonald Second Amendment Cases

The 'Mother of all Links' for the dozens of cases that are out there, active, and will be impacted by McDonald v. Chicago.
This will always be a work in progress. I will continue to update as I have time. I'd like this to be an Index or Table of Contents ONLY, or to use for your own digging. Please post comments regarding these individual cases in the appropriate forum(s) that I've linked when they exist.


Keep
Supreme Court

Radich v Guerrero (Marianas Islands home possession)
Northern Marianas District Case 1:14-CV-00020
http://www.mdshooters.com/showthread.php?t=159684
Docket: http://ia601401.us.archive.org/30/it...65.docket.html

-2) McDonald v. Chicago (show me the money) Gura/Halbrook
7th Circuit Court of Appeals (Case 11-1016)
http://www.mdshooters.com/showthread.php?t=51912
Docket: http://archive.org/download/gov.usco...19.docket.html

-1) Parker (Heller) v. DC (Show me the money)
DC District Court. Case: 1:03-cv-00213
DC Circuit USCA Case Number 12-7021
http://www.mdshooters.com/showthread.php?t=39317
Internet Archive: http://www.archive.org/download/gov....85.docket.html
Maryland SB-281 Cases
1) Doe et al v. O'Malley et al (Maryland Challenge to Handgun Qualification License (HQL))
http://www.mdshooters.com/showthread.php?t=133403
Complaint: http://www.associatedgunclubs.org/le...awsuit_HQL.pdf
Case: MD Federal District 1:13-cv-02861
Docket: http://ia801002.us.archive.org/8/ite...62.docket.html

2) Winks Sporting Goods (Kolbe) et al v. O'Malley et al (Maryland Challenge to SB-281)
Appeal to CA4: http://www.mdshooters.com/showthread.php?p=3388684
MSJ Filing to Ruling: http://www.mdshooters.com/showthread.php?t=148158
http://www.mdshooters.com/showthread.php?t=133243
Complaint: http://www.associatedgunclubs.org/le...al_Lawsuit.pdf
Case: 4th Circuit Court of Appeals 14-1945
Case: MD Federal District 1:13-cv-02841
Docket: http://ia601903.us.archive.org/13/it...64.docket.html

Bear
1) Palmer v. District of Columbia (DC CCW) SAF/Gura
Case: 13-5317 DC Circuit (Mandamus Petitions)
Case: 1:09-cv-01482 DC District Court
DC District WIN: http://www.mdshooters.com/showthread.php?t=156993
http://www.mdshooters.com/showthread.php?t=136081
http://www.mdshooters.com/showthread.php?t=23889
Internet Achive http://ia700408.us.archive.org/2/ite...87.docket.html
On Deck: Win at DC District.

2) Richards v. Prieto (CA CCW) SAF/Gura
Filed: May 19, 2011. Appealed to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. Case: 11-16255
http://www.mdshooters.com/showthread.php?t=45383
Internet Achive: http://www.archive.org/download/gov....26.docket.html
On Deck: Win at CA9 following Peruta!

3) Woollard v. Gallagher (MD CCW) SAF/Gura
Filed: April 2, 2012. 4th Circuit Court of Appeals. Case: 12-1437
http://www.mdshooters.com/showthread.php?t=88287
http://www.mdshooters.com/showthread.php?t=112389
http://www.mdshooters.com/showthread.php?t=116215

http://www.mdshooters.com/showthread.php?t=128786
Internet Archive Docket: http://www.archive.org/download/gov....72.docket.html
On Deck: SCOTUS Cert DENIED.


4) Kachalsky v. Cacace (). NY CCW req's. SAF/Gura
Filed: September 9, 2011. Second Circuit Court of Appeals. Case: 11-3642, 11-3962 (Westchester Cty)
http://www.mdshooters.com/showthread.php?t=96104
Internet Archive Docket: http://www.archive.org/download/gov....87.docket.html
On Deck: SCOTUS Cert DENIED.

5) Jacobs v. Reed (CA CCW)
Filed: April 16, 2010. California Eastern District Court. Case #: 2:2010cv00913
Internet Archive: http://ia700309.us.archive.org/9/ite...78.docket.html
On Deck:

6) Peruta v. County of San Diego (CA), challenging San Diego Cty CCW discretionary issue AND residency requirement for CCW.
Filed 12/16/2010 in the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. Case: 10-56971.
CA9 Docket: http://ia601703.us.archive.org/11/it...71.docket.html
Michel Lawyers Case filings: http://michellawyers.com/guncasetrac...rutavsandiego/
http://www.mdshooters.com/showthread.php?t=41317
On Deck: Win at CA9! Awaiting ruling on AG Intervention.

7) Pizzo v. Newsome, (CA, AKA Gorski case, pro se) San Francisco CCW & Trigger Locks
Filed: September 23, 2009. California Northern District. Case: 4:09-cv-04493
Internet Archive: http://www.archive.org/download/gov....15.docket.html
On Deck:

8) Birdt v. Beck, (CA, CCW in Los Angeles County)
9th Circuit Ct of Appeals Case: 12-55115
http://www.mdshooters.com/showthread.php?t=49256
Amended Complaint: http://www.jonbirdt.com/images/Birdt...FAC-_final.pdf
Internet Archive: http://www.archive.org/download/gov....07.docket.html
On Deck:

9) Drake v. Jerejian, formerly Drake v. Filko, formerly Piszczatoski v. Filko, formerly Muller v. Maenza, (NJ, CCW) SAF
Filed: 24 January, 2012 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals. Case 12-1150
http://www.mdshooters.com/showthread.php?t=142348
http://www.mdshooters.com/showthread.php?t=126972
http://www.mdshooters.com/showthread.php?t=46868
www.mdshooters.com/showthread.php?t=94460
On Deck: Loss at CA3. Petition for Cert DENIED

10) Hightower v. Boston (MA, CCW) SAF/Gura/Commenwealth 2A
1st Circuit Ct of Appeals. Case 11-2281
MDShooters: http://www.mdshooters.com/showthread...165#post911165
Internet Archive Document: http://www.archive.org/download/gov....35.docket.html
On Deck: LOSS AT CIRCUIT.

11) Peterson v. Kilroy Garcia LaCabe (CO, challenging CO residency requirement for CCW).
Filed: 6/6/2011 10th Circuit Court of Appeals Case: 11-1149
http://www.mdshooters.com/showthread.php?p=833723
On Deck: Loss at CA10.

12) Moore et al v. Madigan et al (Illinois Right to Carry) SAF/Jensen
7th Circuit Court of Appeals. Filed 2/3/12. Case # 12-1269
http://www.mdshooters.com/showthread.php?t=57800
Internet Archive Docket: http://www.archive.org/download/gov....15.docket.html
On Deck: WIN!

13) Shepard v. Madigan et al (Illinois Right to Carry) NRA/Halbrook
7th Circuit Court of Appeals. Case # 12-1788
http://www.mdshooters.com/showthread.php?t=57917
Internet Archive Docket: http://www.archive.org/download/gov....07.docket.html
On Deck: WIN!

14) Baker v. Kealoha (Hawaii Right to Carry)
9th Circuit Court of Appeals. Case # 12-16258
CA9 En Banc Petion phase: http://www.mdshooters.com/showthread.php?t=150442
http://www.mdshooters.com/showthread...02#post1246902
Docket: http://www.archive.org/download/gov....53.docket.html
On Deck: Win at CA9 following Peruta!

15) McKay v. Hutchens (California CCW prohibition) NRA & CRPA, Michel & Associates
9th Circuit Court of Appeals. Case # 12-57049
http://www.mdshooters.com/showthread.php?t=134601
Internet Archive at District Court
Internet Archive at Circuit Court of Appeals
All Filings: http://michellawyers.com/mckay-v-sheriff-hutchens/
On Deck: CA9 Oral Arguments 10/7/2013.


Shall not be Infringed
16) Bateman v. Perdue (NC Emergency Powers) SAF/Gura
Filed: June 28, 2010. North Carolina Eastern District Court. Case: 5:2010cv00265
http://www.mdshooters.com/showthread.php?t=39298
Internet Archive Docket: http://www.archive.org/download/gov....58.docket.html

On Deck: WIN AT DISTRICT!

17) Benson v. Chicago (Post McDonald Daley Laws challenge) NRA
Filed: July 6, 2010. Illinois Northern District Court. Case: 1:2010cv04184 or 10−cv−4184
http://www.mdshooters.com/showthread.php?t=39628
Internet Archive Docket: http://www.archive.org/download/gov....65.docket.html
On Deck: Partial Win at District.


Reversed/Remanded 7/6/2011

18) Ezell v. City of Chicago (Gun Range prohibition) SAF/Gura
Filed: October 29, 2010. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals. Case: 10-3525
http://www.mdshooters.com/showthread.php?t=41587
Internet Archive http://www.archive.org/download//gov...75.docket.html
On Deck: Partial Win

19) Nordyke v. King (CA 2A Gov't Sensitive Places) Davis/Kilmer, Calguns Foundation.
Filed: May 1, 2007. United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Case: 07-15763
http://www.mdshooters.com/showthread.php?t=39874
http://wiki.calgunsfoundation.org/in...ordyke_v._King

On Deck: 6/1/2012...12 years, it's over...

20) Peña v. Cid (CA) Gura/Kilmer, challenging CA handgun roster.
Filed: April 30, 2009. California Eastern District Court. Case: 2:09-cv-1185
http://www.mdshooters.com/showthread.php?t=137217
Internet Achive http://www.archive.org/download/gov....44.docket.html
On Deck:

21) Heller v. District of Columbia (aka Heller II...Assault Weapons, High Capacity Magazines, etc)
Remand to DC District, Case 1:08-cv-01289
Filed: April 2, 2010. US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit. Case: 10-7036
http://www.mdshooters.com/showthread.php?t=34391
Internet Archive: http://www.archive.org/download/gov....50.docket.html
On Deck: Remanded to DC District. LOSS at District, being appealed back to Circuit.

22) NRA Jennings D'Cruz v. McCraw et al (TX CCW restrictions for 18-20 year olds) NRA
5th Circuit Court of Appeals Filed: 1/31/12 Case: 12-10091
http://www.mdshooters.com/showthread.php?t=42810
Internet Archive: http://www.archive.org/download/gov....05.docket.html
On Deck: SCOTUS Cert Denied.

23) D'Cruz Jennings NRA v. BATFE (TX handgun possession for 18-20 year olds) NRA
5th Circuit Court of Appeals Case: 11-10959
http://www.mdshooters.com/showthread.php?t=42810
Internet Archive: http://www.archive.org/download/gov....03.docket.html
On Deck: SCOTUS Cert Denied.

24) Jackson et al v. City and County of San Francisco et al (CA Non-sporting ammo ban, trigger locks, firing in city) NRA
Filed: May 15, 2009. California Northern District Court. Case: 3:2009cv02143
http://www.mdshooters.com/showthread.php?t=84995
Internet Archive: http://www.archive.org/download/gov....14.docket.html
http://michellawyers.com/guncasetracker/jacksonvsf/
On Deck:

25) Second Amendment Arms et al v. City of Chicago (Chicago laws against establishment of Gun Stores within City limits)
Filed: July 9, 2010. Illinois District Northern Division. Case 1:10-cv-4257
http://www.mdshooters.com/showthread.php?p=825659
Internet Archive: http://www.archive.org/download/gov....80.docket.html
On Deck:

[s]26) State Ammunition Inc. v. Lindley (CA, Challenge of AB962, Handgun Ammunition Regulations requiring FTF sales, no Mail Order allowed)
Filed: July 16, 2010. California Eastern District Court. Case: 2:2010cv01864
http://wiki.calgunsfoundation.org/in...ion_v._Lindley
http://www.mdshooters.com/showthread.php?t=47387
Internet Archive: http://www.archive.org/download/gov....20.docket.html
On Deck: This case and the sister OODIA case were DISMISSED on 12/2/2010. Not ripe due to law not yet being in effect.

RESOLVED!
27) Wisconsin Carry Inc. v. Wray, Noble: (WI Harassment of Individuals exercising 2A Rights)
Filed: September 24, 2010. Wisconsin Western District. Case: 3:10-cv-00548
http://www.mdshooters.com/showthread.php?t=43600
Internet Archive: http://www.archive.org/download/gov....79.docket.html

On Deck:

28) Wisconsin Carry Inc. v. City of Brookfield: (WI Harassment of Individuals exercising 2A Rights)
Filed: October 7, 2010. Wisconsin Eastern District. Case: 2:2010cv00881
http://www.mdshooters.com/showthread.php?t=44851
Internet Archive: http://www.archive.org/download/gov....74.docket.html[/COLOR]
[COLOR="Magenta"]On Deck: A WIN for the Home Team. Plaintiffs accepted settlement: http://ia700202.us.archive.org/15/it...54374.11.0.pdf

29) Maloney v. Spitzer (nee Rice): (NY Eastern District, Numchuks 2A Case)
Filed: February 18, 2003. New York Eastern District Court. Case: 2:03-cv-00786
Internet Archive: http://ia600503.us.archive.org/2/ite...74.docket.html
On Deck:

30) Schrader v. Holder (DC, misdemeanor prohibitions on firearms ownership) SAF/Gura
Filed: 12/27/11 DC Circuit Court of Appeals. Case: 11-5352
http://www.mdshooters.com/showthread.php?t=44756
Internet Archive: http://www.archive.org/download/gov....64.docket.html
On Deck: Petition for Cert DENIED

31) Enos et al v. Holder et al (CA, Misdemeanor Domestic Violations prohibition) Calguns Foundation/Madison Society
9th Circuit Case: 12-15498
http://www.mdshooters.com/showthread.php?t=55440
Docket: http://www.archive.org/download/gov....24.docket.html
http://michellawyers.com/guncasetracker/enosvholder/
On Deck: Fully Briefed at CA9. Awaiting Oral Arg Date to be released.

32) Kwong v. Bloomberg et al (New York City Handgun Permit Fees challenge) SAF
Filed 4/18/12. 2nd Circuit Ct of Appeals. Case: 12-1578
http://www.mdshooters.com/showthread.php?t=55339
Docket: http://www.archive.org/download/gov....35.docket.html
On Deck: SCOTUS Petition DENIED

33) Richards v. Harris (CA “Assault Weapon” restrictions/definitions vague, ie Shoulder thing that goes up and ‘Bullet Buttons’) SAF, CGF, Kilmer, Davis
California Northern District Filed: May 23rd, 2011. Case: 4:11-cv-02493-LB
http://www.mdshooters.com/showthread.php?t=58469
Docket:http://ia600507.us.archive.org/10/it...76.docket.html
http://www.archive.org/download/gov....28.docket.html
On Deck:

34) Haynie et. al. v. Harris Donald Kilmer, attorney for the Plaintiffs
Challenges CA Assault Weapons
US District Court for Northern California. Case# 3:10-cv-01255
Docket: http://www.archive.org/download/gov....76.docket.html
On Deck: Motion Hearing set for 4/20/2012

35) J&G Sales/NSSF et al v. Melson (TX/CA/AZ/NM Multiple Rifle Sales Reporting) Gardner/Halbrook
Filed 8/3/2011. DC District Case # 1:11-cv-01401
http://www.mdshooters.com/showthread.php?t=62741
Docket: http://ia700702.us.archive.org/0/ite...64.docket.html
On Deck: Appealed to DC Circuit

36) Silvester v. Harris (CA 10 Day Waiting Period on 2nd purchase) SAF/CGF
9th Circuit Case 14-16840
Filed 12/23/2011. California Eastern District Case #: 1:11-cv-02137
http://www.mdshooters.com/showthread.php?t=72289
Docket: http://www.archive.org/download/gov....62.docket.html
On Deck: Win at District, being Appealed to CA9!

37) Gowder v. Chicago (Chicago misdemeanor prohibition for home ownership) NRA
Filed 2/24/2011. IL Northern District Case: 1:11-cv-01304
http://www.mdshooters.com/showthread.php?t=85126
Docket: http://archive.org/download/gov.usco...64.docket.html
On Deck: Win at District. Appeal being considered.

38) Abramski v United States (Federal "Straw Purchase" challenges)
Petition for Cert granted 10/15/2013.
Petition phase briefs: http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files...united-states/
http://www.mdshooters.com/showthread.php?t=132072
Docket: http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.a...es/12-1493.htm
On Deck: Loss at SCOTUS.

39) NYSRPA v. Cuomo (NY SAFE Act Challenge)
2nd Circuit Court of Appeals Case 14-0036
http://www.mdshooters.com/showthread.php?t=121070
NYSRPA Filings: http://www.nysrpa.org/files/SAFE/
Michel Lawyers: http://michellawyers.com/new-york-st...y-of-new-york/
Docket:
On Deck:

Residency Requirements

40) Lane et al v. Holder (Virginia/DC Interstate Handgun Purchase prohibition) SAF/Gura
4th Circuit Court of Appeals. Case: 11-1847
http://www.mdshooters.com/showthread.php?t=99357&page=2
http://www.mdshooters.com/showthread.php?t=57620
Docket: http://www.archive.org/download/gov....97.docket.html
On Deck: SCOTUS Cert Denied.

41) Mishaga v. Monken (IL, non-resident prohibition on possession of firearms due to lack of FOID) MOUNTAIN STATES LEGAL FOUNDATION
Filed: July 27, 2010. Illinois Central District Court. Case: 3:2010cv03187
http://www.mountainstateslegal.org/l...egalcaseid=225
http://www.mdshooters.com/showthread.php?p=878294
Internet Archive: http://www.archive.org/download/gov....72.docket.html
On Deck: Jury Trial is RESET to February 7, 2012.


Reversed/Remanded 4/15/2011
42) Dearth v. Holder, (was Hodgkins v Holder) US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit, striking down residency restrictions for buying handguns under the Gun Control Act of 1968. SAF/Gura.
Filed: March 5, 2010. U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit. Case: 10-5062
http://www.mdshooters.com/showthread.php?p=792006
http://wiki.calgunsfoundation.org/in...kins_v._Holder
Internet Archive: http://www.archive.org/download/gov....46.docket.html Only shows filing when in DC District. DC Circuit filings in MDS Thread.
On Deck:


43) GeorgiaCarry.org v. Toomer (GA, Challenging residency requirement for CCW)
11th Circuit Court of Appeals Case: 10-11951
http://www.georgiacarry.com/county/fulton_nonres/ (Appealed to 11th Ckt)
On Deck:

RESOLVED 2/10/2011!!
44) Smith v. Nelson (SD, Challenging SD residency requirement for Legal Immigrants for CCW) ACLU
South Dakoka District Court. Filed: 1/03/2011. Case: 4:11-cv-04001
http://www.mdshooters.com/showthread.php?t=49173
Internet Archive: http://ia700408.us.archive.org/34/it...87.docket.html
On Deck:


45) Fletcher et al v. Haas (MA, Challenging MA residency requirement for Legal Immigrants for CCW) SAF/Gura
Massachusetts District Court. Filed: 4/15/2011. Case: 1:11-cv-10644
http://www.mdshooters.com/showthread.php?t=56003
Internet Archive: http://www.archive.org/download/gov....76.docket.html

On Deck: WIN AT DISTRICT!

46) Jackson et al v. King et al (SAF Challenging NM lawful resident alien CCW restrictions)
New Mexico District Case #12-cv-00421. Filed 04-21-2012.
http://www.mdshooters.com/showthread.php?t=81317
Internet Archive
On Deck:
Sensitive Areas

[COLOR="SeaGreen"]9/18/10, RESOLVED!. See post 18 below.
47) Baker v. Biaggi (NV, Does Second Amendment protects the right of individuals to possess functional firearms in tents within state park) MOUNTAIN STATES LEGAL FOUNDATION
http://www.mountainstateslegal.org/l...egalcaseid=224
Case: 3:10-cv-00426-ECR-RAM Baker v. Biaggi et al
Internet Archive: http://www.archive.org/download/gov....27.docket.html
On Deck:

48) WisconsinCarry.org et al v. Doyle et al (WI, Challenging the 1,000 ft Gun Free School Zone GFSZ)
Internet Archive: http://www.archive.org/download/gov....91.docket.html
On Deck:

49) GeorgiaCarry.Org, Inc., et al v. State of Georgia (GA Church Carry Case)
11th Circuit Court of Appeals. Case: 11-10387
http://www.mdshooters.com/showthread.php?t=87325
http://georgiacarry.com/state/places_of_worship/
Docket: http://www.archive.org/download/gov....32.docket.html
On Deck: Loss at Circuit

50) Bonidy v. USPS (CO, Challenging US Post Office as Sensitive, Gun-Free Zone Area) National Association for Gun Rights (NAGR) and Mountain States Legal Foundation (MSLF)
Filed 10/4/2010. Colorado District Court. Case: 1:10-cv-02408-RPM
CA10 Case 13-1391 (Plaintiffs) and 13-1374 (.gov)
http://www.mdshooters.com/showthread.php?p=830897
Internet Archive (CA10): http://ia601001.us.archive.org/33/it...91.docket.html
Internet Archive (District): http://www.archive.org/download/gov....68.docket.html
On Deck: Win at District! Appealed to CA10.

51) Hall v. Garcia (San Francisco Gun Free School Zone 1000ft regs) Pro Se
California Northern District. Case: 10-03799
http://www.mdshooters.com/showthread.php?t=56017
http://forum.opencarry.org/forums/sh...=1#post1340462
http://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/s...d.php?t=336340 "Bigtoe416" Case
Internet Archive: http://www.archive.org/download/gov....28.docket.html
On Deck: LOSS At District.


52) West Virginia Citizens Defense League, Inc. v. City of Martinsburg (WV, Carry on City property)
4th Circuit Ct of Appeals Case: 11-2231 Filed: 11/09/2011
http://www.mdshooters.com/showthread.php?t=50293
Docket: http://www.archive.org/download/gov....15.docket.html
On Deck: Appealed to 4th Circuit.

53) West Virginia Citizens Defense League, Inc. et al v. City of Charleston et al (WV, Carry on City property)
West Virginia Southern District, Case: 2:11-cv-00048 Filed: 1/24/2011
http://www.mdshooters.com/showthread.php?t=50293
Docket: http://www.archive.org/download/gov....17.docket.html
On Deck:

54) Tribble v State Board of Education (Idaho). Possession in University Housing. Pro Se.
http://www.mdshooters.com/showthread.php?t=50738
On Deck:


__________________
Mark C.

Dallas/Ft Worth, TX

Post McDonald Second Amendment Cases/Links HERE

Last edited by krucam; Yesterday at 03:12 PM.
krucam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 20th, 2010, 05:36 PM   #2
Patrick
MSI Executive Member
 
Patrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Calvert County
Posts: 7,459
Holy Shite.

You are the freakin' man!
Patrick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 20th, 2010, 06:09 PM   #3
swinokur
In a State of Denial
 
swinokur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Bethesda
Posts: 17,871
all i can say is wow!
swinokur is online now   Reply With Quote
Old August 30th, 2010, 05:38 PM   #4
ezliving
Besieger
 
ezliving's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Undisclosed Secure Location
Posts: 4,525
Sticky?


__________________


In Muscarello v. United States, 524 U. S. 125 (1998), in the course of analyzing the meaning of “carries a firearm” in a federal criminal statute, JUSTICE GINSBURG wrote that “[s]urely a most familiar meaning is, as the Constitution’s Second Amendment . . . indicate[s]: ‘wear, bear, or carry . . . upon the person or in the clothing or in a pocket, for the purpose . . . of being armed and ready for offensive or defensive action in a case of conflict with another person.’ ” DC v. Heller (2008.)
ezliving is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 31st, 2010, 06:21 AM   #5
Patrick
MSI Executive Member
 
Patrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Calvert County
Posts: 7,459
Quote:
Originally Posted by ezliving View Post
Sticky?
+1
Patrick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 10th, 2010, 09:51 AM   #6
john_bud
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,767
Are there any cases attempting to strike down the Tax stamp requirements for NFA guns/silencers in light of the 2A getting the same protections as the 1A? As I understand it, the ink tax in MN case would be similar and that tax on ink and paper was ruled an unconstitutional infringement on free speech. So wouldn't the excise tax on guns, ammo and NFA items also be unconstitutional?
john_bud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 10th, 2010, 10:07 AM   #7
Patrick
MSI Executive Member
 
Patrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Calvert County
Posts: 7,459
No cases yet, but everyone agrees some are coming. The big steps right now are squaring away the right in the first place. We still don't have that one neatly wrapped. We got the tools, but work remains.

I don't think NFA is going down in the Courts. I outlined the reasons elsewhere, but even Scalia suggested the same by reference. We'll need to have Congress fix that one.

Taxes on the core ingredients of the right (excise, etc.) are all up for grabs. So too "registration" and "permit" fees.

The first to get challenged will be permitting and registration fees, requirements and timelines. Right now all the challenges are on the actual requirements themselves ("good and substantial", etc.) with a slight reference to expediency (timelines). Feet dragging will be challenged next (one year permit processing and onerous steps), followed by registration and permit fees. I don't see them surviving under the strictest of standards, where 2A is viewed like voting. But some arguments exist to keep them alive as long as they are low cost. There is a chance that an argument in favor of carry-permit fees could succeed even under a strict interpretation. I think it'll depend on the mood of the court.

I suspect excise taxes will be challenged eventually, but not import taxes or import restrictions. Those are almost surely legit.
Patrick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 16th, 2010, 06:20 PM   #8
Gray Peterson
Member
 
Gray Peterson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Lynnwood, WA
Posts: 407
Quote:
Originally Posted by Patrick View Post
I don't think NFA is going down in the Courts. I outlined the reasons elsewhere, but even Scalia suggested the same by reference. We'll need to have Congress fix that one.
People need to be more precise in saying what they mean. Do they mean taking down the entire NFA or do they mean striking down 922(o). I would be perfectly happy if 922(o) was struck down.
Gray Peterson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 16th, 2010, 06:35 PM   #9
Gray Peterson
Member
 
Gray Peterson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Lynnwood, WA
Posts: 407
Oh,

Mishaga v. Monken

http://www.mountainstateslegal.org/l...egalcaseid=225

http://ia360701.us.archive.org/15/it...72.docket.html

Baker v. Biaggi:

http://www.mountainstateslegal.org/l...egalcaseid=224

Can't find RECAP docket for this.
Gray Peterson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 16th, 2010, 06:38 PM   #10
krucam
Senior Member
 
krucam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: 3rd Rock from the Sun...DFW, TX
Posts: 5,854
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gray Peterson View Post
Thanks Gray for stopping in!! I'll work my google-fu and pacer-fu and justia-fu as well.

How are things going in Colorado??

EDIT: And this is exactly what I was hoping for in my OP, a great heads up on additional post-McDonald cases. There will be many and I hope to serve this "table of contents" well...Thanks again Gray...


__________________
Mark C.

Dallas/Ft Worth, TX

Post McDonald Second Amendment Cases/Links HERE
krucam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 16th, 2010, 07:04 PM   #11
Gray Peterson
Member
 
Gray Peterson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Lynnwood, WA
Posts: 407
Quote:
Originally Posted by krucam View Post
Thanks Gray for stopping in!! I'll work my google-fu and pacer-fu and justia-fu as well.

How are things going in Colorado??

EDIT: And this is exactly what I was hoping for in my OP, a great heads up on additional post-McDonald cases. There will be many and I hope to serve this "table of contents" well...Thanks again Gray...
Cross motions for summary judgment filed against each other. Senior Judge Walker David Miller has the stuff that's been filed as of July 19. I am not sure how long he is going to take to write up the ruling. Been told that MSJ's take anywhere from 3 to 6 months to write up something.

Can you RECAP Document 17 of the Baker case please? Need to see what stipulation they are talking about.
Gray Peterson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 16th, 2010, 07:16 PM   #12
krucam
Senior Member
 
krucam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: 3rd Rock from the Sun...DFW, TX
Posts: 5,854
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gray Peterson View Post
Oh,
Baker v. Biaggi:

http://www.mountainstateslegal.org/l...egalcaseid=224

Can't find RECAP docket for this.
Recapped and Internet Archive and Justia found...see above for Baker v. Biaggi.


__________________
Mark C.

Dallas/Ft Worth, TX

Post McDonald Second Amendment Cases/Links HERE
krucam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 16th, 2010, 10:13 PM   #13
Gray Peterson
Member
 
Gray Peterson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Lynnwood, WA
Posts: 407
Jackson v. City and County of San Francisco should be added. Northern District of California, federal

Pizzo v. Newsom, Gorski case, California Northern District, federal.
Gray Peterson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 16th, 2010, 10:21 PM   #14
Gray Peterson
Member
 
Gray Peterson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Lynnwood, WA
Posts: 407
More cases:

OOIDA v. Lindley, State Ammunition v. Lindley. Not specifically 2A cases but gun related.

Dearth v. Holder, US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit, striking down residency restrictions for buying handguns under the Gun Control Act of 1968.
Gray Peterson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 16th, 2010, 10:22 PM   #15
gprimr1
MSI Board Member
 
gprimr1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 17,139
Images: 4
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gray Peterson View Post
More cases:

OOIDA v. Lindley, State Ammunition v. Lindley. Not specifically 2A cases but gun related.

Dearth v. Holder, US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit, striking down residency restrictions for buying handguns under the Gun Control Act of 1968.
Dearth could have very interesting implications.


__________________
2014
gprimr1 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old September 17th, 2010, 06:42 AM   #16
Patrick
MSI Executive Member
 
Patrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Calvert County
Posts: 7,459
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gray Peterson View Post
People need to be more precise in saying what they mean. Do they mean taking down the entire NFA or do they mean striking down 922(o). I would be perfectly happy if 922(o) was struck down.
Scalia specifically mentioned machines guns (922(o)). There are other posts on the net talking about the entire NFA "being unconstitutional", but a good number of scholars say "no".
Patrick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 17th, 2010, 11:31 AM   #17
yellowfin
Pro 2A Gastronome
 
yellowfin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Lancaster, PA
Posts: 1,244
Send a message via AIM to yellowfin
922(o) might be best struck down by this: http://online.wsj.com/article_email/...TExNDUyWj.html
yellowfin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 18th, 2010, 04:43 PM   #18
krucam
Senior Member
 
krucam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: 3rd Rock from the Sun...DFW, TX
Posts: 5,854
Quote:
Originally Posted by krucam View Post
Recapped and Internet Archive and Justia found...see above for Baker v. Biaggi.
This one may have a life shorter than a Mayfly on this thread, which is good news. We didn't have a thread on here for this one, so here goes...

Baker v. Biaggi (NV, Does Second Amendment protects the right of individuals to possess functional firearms within State Parks)

Preliminary Injunction to Stay Proceedings (say uncle): http://www.scribd.com/full/37685168?...n6084uvurswxia

Story at: http://onlygunsandmoney.blogspot.com/
Quote:
The Nevada Example

All parties in the case challenging the possession and discharge of firearms for self-defense in Nevada State Parks, Baker v. Drozdoff et al (former Baker v. Biaggi et al), have agreed to a preliminary injunction in the case. This injunction prevents the enforcement of Nevada Administrative Code Sec. 407.105(1)(b) - (c) which prohibits the possession of a loaded firearm unless one had a recognized concealed carry permit as well as the discharge of any weapon. Nevada has 60 days in which to start an administrative rule-making procedure to amend this code to remove language that abridges the right to keep and bear arms.
Low hanging fruit, but a victory regardless...

It sure would be nice if MD and SAF would come to such an agreement. I'll go back to the world of unicorns and gnomes now...


__________________
Mark C.

Dallas/Ft Worth, TX

Post McDonald Second Amendment Cases/Links HERE
krucam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 19th, 2010, 12:39 PM   #19
ozwyn
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Richardson, Texas
Posts: 1,176
It is heartwarming to see so many cases in the legal system to win back gun rights. Also, it keeps drawing me to the thought that our rights are far more reliably won in the courts than trying to elect a professional liar (politician) and hoping he goes against his nature and keeps his word.


__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by DD214 View Post
Holy crap. I'm running a brothel full of Mosin whores.
http://supersexycpr.com/cpr.html
ozwyn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 19th, 2010, 09:05 PM   #20
Gray Peterson
Member
 
Gray Peterson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Lynnwood, WA
Posts: 407
Another case, 11th Circuit Court of Appeals has GeorgiaCarry.org v. Toomer, a case similar to Peterson v. LaCabe. This lost in district court though on standing grounds (and this is why I applied for a license and was denied).

GeorgiaCarry.org v. Pinkie Toomer District Court Docket.

GEORGIACARRY.ORG, INC.,
REGIS GOYKE,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

versus

PINKIE TOOMER,
in her official capacity as Judge of the Probate Court
of Fulton County, Georgia, and all others similarly situated,

Defendant - Appellee.
04/29/2010 2 pg, 43.9 KB CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant GeorgiaCarry.Org, Inc. on 04/27/2010. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid.
05/04/2010 Email Delivery Failure. Message could not be delivered to Attorney John R. Monroe for Appellants GeorgiaCarry.Org, Inc. and Regis Goyke. 5.1.0 - Unknown address error 550-'john.mornoe1@earthlink.net...User unknown'

05/06/2010 APPEARANCE of Counsel filed by Attorney John R. Monroe for Appellant Regis Goyke in 10-11951.

05/06/2010 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney John R. Monroe for Appellants GeorgiaCarry.Org, Inc. and Regis Goyke.

05/06/2010 Civil Appeal Statement filed by Attorney John R. Monroe for Appellants GeorgiaCarry.Org, Inc. and Regis Goyke.

05/19/2010 1 pg, 33.76 KB This APPELLANT has been notified that upon expiration of fourteen (14) days from this date, this appeal will be dismissed by the clerk without further notice unless the required filing fee has been received in District Court.

06/03/2010 Appellant's Brief filed by Appellants GeorgiaCarry.Org, Inc. and Regis Goyke. Service date: 06/02/2010 by US mail - Attorney for Appellee: Ware.

06/03/2010 2 pg, 38.46 KB Record Excerpts filed by Attorney John R. Monroe for Appellants GeorgiaCarry.Org, Inc. and Regis Goyke. Deficiencies: doc#12-answer/response to complaint. Service date: 06/02/2010 US mail - Attorney for Appellee(s): Ware, Welch.

06/03/2010 34 pg, 151.67 KB E-Brief Tendered: Appellant brief for Appellant GeorgiaCarry.Org, Inc..

06/14/2010 Appellate fee paid was paid on 04/28/2010 as to Appellant GeorgiaCarry.Org, Inc..

06/17/2010 2 pg, 40.53 KB Briefing Notice issued to Appellee Pinkie Toomer. The brief is due July 6, 2010.

06/17/2010 Certificate of Readiness filed as to Appellant GeorgiaCarry.Org, Inc..

06/21/2010 Modified record excerpts/modifications to record excerpts received on 06/17/2010 from Attorney John R. Monroe for Appellants GeorgiaCarry.Org, Inc. and Regis Goyke. All deficiencies have been corrected.

07/06/2010 Appellee's Brief filed by Appellee Pinkie Toomer. Service date: 07/06/2010 US mail - Attorney for Appellant: Monroe.

07/06/2010 Added Attorney(s) Matthew C. Welch for party(s) Appellee Pinkie Toomer, in case 10-11951.

07/06/2010 Added Attorney(s) William Shannon Sams for party(s) Appellee Pinkie Toomer, in case 10-11951.

07/06/2010 APPEARANCE of Counsel filed by Attorney William Shannon Sams for Appellee Pinkie Toomer in 10-11951, Attorney Matthew C. Welch for Appellee Pinkie Toomer in 10-11951.

07/13/2010 Record on Appeal filed. Record Part: Pleadings, No. of Volumes: 2; Record Part: Transcript, No. of Volumes: 1

07/21/2010 32 pg, 109.44 KB E-Brief Tendered: Appellee brief for Appellee Pinkie Toomer.

07/23/2010 11 pg, 104.15 KB E-Brief Tendered: Reply brief for Appellants GeorgiaCarry.Org, Inc. and Regis Goyke.

07/26/2010 Reply Brief filed by Appellants GeorgiaCarry.Org, Inc. and Regis Goyke. Service 07/22/2010 US mail - Attorney for Appellee: Ware.
Attached Files
File Type: pdf GeorgiaCarry Appellant Brief.pdf (173.7 KB, 6 views)
File Type: pdf Toomer Appellee Brief.pdf (173.7 KB, 5 views)
File Type: pdf GeorgiaCarry Appellant Reply Brief.pdf (112.3 KB, 5 views)
Gray Peterson is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

  Home Page > Forum List > Gun Rights and Legislation > National 2A Issues


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2013, Maryland Shooters, LLC