NM governor suspends open & concealed carry in Albuquerque for 30 days

[RFBfromDE]

If the DA won’t prosecute, why will the SP even bother. If its a civil charge, maybe the DA is not involved?

Maybe the State Toady Police are nothing more that boot licking rubber stampers there.

 

[Vile Shadow]

NM State police say they will enforce this emergency proclamation.

Might be a clash between them and the Sheriff in the future

 

[Jim12]

Hearing for Case Against New Mexico Governor’s Ban on Carrying Firearms Postponed​

Hearing for Case Against New Mexico Governor’s Ban on Carrying Firearms Postponed

We don't have a reason.

legalinsurrection.com

​

Comments​

alaskabob | September 12, 2023 at 11:41 am
Postponed for 30 days….. awaiting orders from BHO and VJ. Getting the FBI and ATF “Zero Tolerance” troops in position.

• 
  
  GWB in reply to alaskabob. | September 12, 2023 at 12:53 pm
  
  Nah. It will just be postponed – /checks calendar/ – 4 weeks, less one day.
  THEN it will be declared moot.

 

[teratos]

The State Police open themselves up to to 1983 lawsuits….this isn’t ambiguous

 

[Ski169]

Even the anti gun States Attorney will not support this. Just confirmed on the local news as well.

 

[308Scout]

The State Police open themselves up to to 1983 lawsuits….this isn’t ambiguous

Yep - IIRC, NM did away with qualified immunity for police a couple of years ago making this much more likely.

 

[MJD438]

Donk now set for 9/13/2023 @ 1300MDT

 

[teratos]

Yep - IIRC, NM did away with qualified immunity for police a couple of years ago making this much more likely.

The boots on the ground are hopefully smarter than the brass. Ignorance of the law is no excuse…especially when violating civil rights.

 

[eruby]

Donk now set for 9/13/2023 @ 1300MDT

???

 

[MJD438]

???

The party named on the lawsuit referenced earlier

 

[Sunrise]

We've heard all this before, from a different clown in a different circus:



Watch at 10:43.

Tyrant.

 

[traveller]

In this instance , the Sheriff , And the PD Chief , And the DA will not enforce .

Watch for the enforcement be an 'administrative fee' sort of like the school zone speed cameras. The SP knows the DA is going to drop the cases if they go to court so they go around it. If you don't pay, well you can't renew a car registration or obtain a tax refund. Because you know, it's an emergency and stuff.

 

[Bob A]

Watch some dark money gun-grabber group set up an OSINT site like was done for the January 6th people:

Sedition Hunters

Sedition Hunters is a global community of open source intelligence investigators (OSINT) working together to assist the U.S. FBI and Washington D.C. Capitol Police in finding people who allegedly committed crimes in the January 6 capitol riots.

seditionhunters.org

They don't have to be NM-based. They can do this from anywhere.

Still waiting for "Sedition Hunters" to go all OSINT on the BLM/Antifa city burners. ANyone been prosecuted yet?

 

[eruby]

The party named on the lawsuit referenced earlier

Your answer makes no sense to me

Donk sounds like some sort of legal procedure

But you say it's a party named in the lawsuit

Makes no sense to me

 

[308Scout]

Your answer makes no sense to me

Donk sounds like some sort of legal procedure

But you say it's a party named in the lawsuit

Makes no sense to me

Donk sounds like something that should have an Urban Dictionary entry to me, and it does upon further review (several actually), but here we are.

Donk v. Grisham, 1:23-cv-00772 - CourtListener.com

Docket for Donk v. Grisham, 1:23-cv-00772 — Brought to you by Free Law Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal information.

www.courtlistener.com

Even better that the plaintiff's full name is Randy Donk.

 

[MJD438]

Your answer makes no sense to me

Donk sounds like some sort of legal procedure

But you say it's a party named in the lawsuit

Makes no sense to me

Holy hell, let me draw you a map...

1. Post #232 linked to an article.

2. Said article contains a PACER output that provides the name of the lawsuit as Donk et al v Grisham et al.

3. Established convention on most fora is to shorten the name of court cases to one of the named parties, in this case I chose the Named Plaintiff, Mr. Donk, as the shortened name and further convention is that court cases are normally listed in Italics to differentiate them from other text in the thread.

4. I ran a PACER search (Public Access To Court Electronic Records, a tool that allows a user to search Federal court records, to avoid additional confusion) this evening and determined that, low and behold, the frigging court rescheduled the damned case and it is for tomorrow.

 

[Sage954]

His intro is great.
Ep. 1219 - Tyrannical Leftist Woman Tries To Abolish The Second Amendment


https://www.dailywire.com/podcasts/...t-woman-tries-to-abolish-the-second-amendment

 

[Brute]

Donk sounds like something that should have an Urban Dictionary entry to me, and it does upon further review (several actually), but here we are.

Donk v. Grisham, 1:23-cv-00772 - CourtListener.com

Docket for Donk v. Grisham, 1:23-cv-00772 — Brought to you by Free Law Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal information.

www.courtlistener.com

Even better that the plaintiff's full name is Randy Donk.

Crocodile Dundee 2!
"I don't need a gun, I got a Donk."

 

[eruby]

Holy hell, let me draw you a map...

1. Post #232 linked to an article.

2. Said article contains a PACER output that provides the name of the lawsuit as Donk et al v Grisham et al.

3. Established convention on most fora is to shorten the name of court cases to one of the named parties, in this case I chose the Named Plaintiff, Mr. Donk, as the shortened name and further convention is that court cases are normally listed in Italics to differentiate them from other text in the thread.

4. I ran a PACER search (Public Access To Court Electronic Records, a tool that allows a user to search Federal court records, to avoid additional confusion) this evening and determined that, low and behold, the frigging court rescheduled the damned case and it is for tomorrow.

Despite your overt rudeness, thank you for the excellent explanation

 

[delaware_export]

Reschedule for tomorrow 1pm, and that’s probably their local time.

per FPC Twitter feed