Day One.
One of my basic concerns is that of precedent. Over the last year, I've seen applicants receive a permit only to witness others be denied, based pretty much on the same set of circumstances. Memory alone doesn't cut it. The Board needs a mechanism/process whereby its decisions are not arbitrary...we have enough of that when examining MSP positions. It's also goes to presentation. Two applicants (again with similar arguments); one gets the golden ring, the other a refusal based at least in part on how well a person speaks in public. This has got to stop. The quicker the better.
Welcome back homie!Day One.
Day One.
Has there ever been a lawsuit over this?
If one realtor gets their ccw, all realtors should be able to get the ccw. There should be no presentation of arguments, there should only be a list of facts.
Welcome back homie!
I'm gonna ask Norton to ban your logic. We don't need your truth talk here. lol
Zoo can ban himself.
Ew,.... forgot, I've got a story of an investor/landlord who got his permit, spoke with him a few months ago during my MDS break.
Listen folks,... all he had to do was be attacked from behind while walking down a staircase and then have his head repeatedly slammed into a tile floor until left for dead in a pool of blood. If you don't mind short term memory loss and slurred speach for the rest of your life.
Dispute over damages and return of a security deposit. If you think you can't be put in a quite literal fight for your life over something so trivial think again.
We certainly don't need some folically challenged know it all thinking he's going to "set a precedent" for a whole industry.
Realtors don't need permits.
We certainly don't need some folically challenged know it all thinking he's going to "set a precedent" for a whole industry.
Realtors don't need permits.
Ew,.... forgot, I've got a story of an investor/landlord who got his permit, spoke with him a few months ago during my MDS break.
Listen folks,... all he had to do was be attacked from behind while walking down a staircase and then have his head repeatedly slammed into a tile floor until left for dead in a pool of blood. If you don't mind short term memory loss and slurred speach for the rest of your life.
Dispute over damages and return of a security deposit. If you think you can't be put in a quite literal fight for your life over something so trivial think again.
We certainly don't need some folically challenged know it all thinking he's going to "set a precedent" for a whole industry.
Realtors don't need permits.
That's almost straight from the audio recording...
So if someone you know and have a contract with owes you money and attacks you, you can get a permit but if someone you don't know just attacks you you can't get a permit?
Zoo can ban himself.
I've tried but I keep appealing to myself and winning.
They've (the State) has very carefully designed this permitting scheme to only allow business owners and others with money/power or who will be real torn in their side to get permits.
Raskin around the 8min mark makes very good observations. He is puzzled that new evidence is presented, which is absolutely understandable. I always perceived an appeal as arguing MSP has made a mistake with evidence already provided. Raskin is a bit puzzled that new evidence is introduced. I can understand MSP at a hearing getting pissed with people dropping NEW CLAIMS, and EVIDENCE, they did not have and oppurtunity to review when making the decision. Some people make the leap that an appeal is a venue to pile on more argument, when every appeal I've seen is basically argument the previous arbiter made a mistake or got something wrong on evidence and testimony already provided. One of the longest hearings where a member prevailed, they were arguing law. That is not the same as introducing new testimony, claims or evidence. When people come in with a bucket of more reasons they should get the permit, it is arguably a case where MSP should allow amended applications if denied before the appeal process.. then if denied again, all the cards are on the table at appeal.
Their hands really arent tied.
They have a remarkable amount of discretion. Anyone saying differently doesnt understand, or doesnt want you to understand.