If Psycho wants me to parse out the 17 year old boys' tactics, he can pay me $75 an hour for my experience.
Every man has a "line",
Some know where that line is before hand,, some not until they face it, or even cross it.
Apparently KR's line was watching The politicians, police, etc fail to protect the city where 1/2 his family lived.
Where were you that night? I don't see you standing with your "Brother's in Arms" at these riots.
Who wanted him punished? You keep saying that but you cannot quote anyone saying that.
Here's a fact, if he had better judgment, he wouldn't have been in this mess.
Norman Bates?If Psycho wants me to parse out the 17 year old boys' tactics, he can pay me $75 an hour for my experience.
He is referring to me. Instead of answering what I asked him, he deflected and made the whole thing about himself.Norman Bates?
To whom is this in reference?
Yeah. You trained with no FAMs ever.He is referring to me. Instead of answering what I asked him, he deflected and made the whole thing about himself.
I have completed training classes with a few Air Marshals, and some of them knew him. None of them had ever heard of him having any actual gunfight "experience". As to paying him for his "experience", I have an entire adulthood of military, police and civilian firearms/tactics/infantry skills training, and actual live experience of my own, so I don't perceive that he offers anything of value for which I would pay him.
Nope.BTW you including of Hamlet's soliloquy/monolog is perhaps not what you think it is. It isn't about some noble thing. Hamlet is contemplating whether to put up with the troubles of life or commit suicide in that passage.
Well that was a really professional response. You are correct, I am a novice at trolling. It is blatantly obvious who has the superior trolling experience in our little exchange, and it is definitely not me. You win! Feel better now?Yeah. You trained with no FAMs ever lol
Where did you do that and what training?
You know my full name they would know? Because they don't know a blaster229.
Let's hear you parse down Kyle and his stellar performance.
You made everything about me by asking about me and I decided not to.
Much to the enjoyment of a whole nation, there have fortunately been no hijackings. Sorry to disappoint you.
Although the guy I decided not to shoot on the side of I35 South in Texas back in the mid 90s is ok with my decision, and so am I. I know I don't want to kill someone if I don't have to.
But tell us about all your cqb combat kills. Oh wait, you have no knife kills?
You're lacking.
Tell us how you lobbed rounds 300 yards away at an adversary in the "sandbox". That's not training and that's not gunfight experience.
Why haven't you helped any member here with your wealth of combat pistol experience and knowledge of shooting? Seems a waste of some fine training you've had.
Go troll elsewhere, novice.
So you don't know the FAMs you trained with who know me?Well that was a really professional response. You are correct, I am a novice at trolling. It is blatantly obvious who has the superior trolling experience in our little exchange, and it is definitely not me. You win! Feel better now?
No logical, reasoned discussion from you, just the typical response of someone who cannot be questioned without it provoking a defensive reaction that responds with insinuation, accusation, insults, name calling, etc.
There are plenty of people on this forum with as much or more training and experience than you, yet none of them are constantly proclaiming their expertise, and then responding with bluster, bravado, and name-calling when anyone posts any opinion contrary to theirs. You don't come across as a professional trainer with your responses, you come across as a bully who is going to throw a fit if anyone dares to question you or to have a different opinion than whatever you post.
I have trained plenty of people, both in the US and overseas, and I have never felt any urge to respond with insults or name calling just because I was questioned or because anyone else had a different opinion than me. I don't feel threatened by questions or contrary opinions, I see the discussion of those questions and opinions as a good learning experience for students, forum readers, and for me.
Entertaining as it may be to some of the readers here, the exchange you and I have had on this Kyle Rittenhouse topic has not provided anything of value to anyone reading this thread, unless you find some comfort in responding to me with your jibes just because I dared to offer a different opinion than yours, and pointed out that you are not the only person here with any training or experience. I'm not going to waste any more of Norton's bandwidth trying to have a discussion with someone who responds like you do instead of being part of an adult conversation. If your ego requires it, you are welcome to have the last word and harangue me to your heart's content, or you can report our entire exchange and ask for it all to be deleted by a moderator. I hope you feel happy and satisfied with the outcome either way.
If we get back to the lawsuit, I think the basic premise is that Kyle and the Police conspired to allow armed "protectors" to tamp down the rioting.Every man has a "line",
Some know where that line is before hand,, some not until they face it, or even cross it.
Apparently KR's line was watching The politicians, police, etc fail to protect the city where 1/2 his family lived.
Check your PMs.So you don't know the FAMs you trained with who know me?
You took training from them or you did some training along with them or you trained FAMs?
You asked them if they knew blaster 229? "Do you know a FAM on a gun forum?" You asked that and they said yes?
That's really strange.
Oh, and I don't have a training business nor do I charge anything when I go meet people at the range.
$75 and hour was sarcasm.
Not only do you have discretion, but common sense and discernment.Mr Rittenhouse acted with restraint and appropriateness in how he defended himself.
But there was no reason whatsoever he needed to be there. But I’m a 45 year old man and my frontal cortex is (I hope) fully formed. His was not.
“I was legally in the right” is a slight simplification different than “I went out into a dangerous environment, voluntarily, when police were already there and I had no personally owned real property to protect; and I was attacked and killed my attackers quite reasonably to protect myself.” Will the lawsuit go anywhere? Probably not. Would I have gone out into Mordor for no good reason and put myself in such a situation ? No.
One phrase comes to mind over and over “discretion is the better part of valor”
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
"I guess it came as a shock to why he's filing a lawsuit because he admitted that he pointed a gun in my face and that he chased me down," Rittenhouse said.
Well his dad and other family lived there so he was there alot. He worked there and had friends thier.Only thing I'd like to point out is that was not his neighborhood, or even his town. He lived in Illinois about 15-20 miles away. That would be like me driving downtown to Baltimore to help out with the riots there. I've been to Baltimore. It isn't my hometown (Kenosha wasn't Kyle's hometown or place of residence either). It isn't all that close. close to 20 miles from me.
So, this was not happening in "his town". I'd still think he was making some bad decisions even if it was HIS town at 17. But it wasn't his town. And it especially wasn't his neighborhood with his neighbors he was trying to defend. So yes, for all of those reasons, it emphasizes to me why he was dumb and the people involved in the parental guidance were dumb.
I forget who replied earlier, yes, I am aware his Mom dropped him off to clean up graffiti. But unless I've missed something, nothing came out at trial that she was going to pick him up a few hours later and he skipped the pickup and also smuggled a rifle in a bag with him or had a friend bring him a rifle so he could play armed medic that night. Or even that he was going to get a ride him in a few hours and lied to his mom. She knew, roughly, that he was putting himself in a fair amount of danger in a town that has had serious riots with threats of MORE riots. Nothing came out that she was hounding him all evening on where he was, why wasn't he home, etc. So yes, his mother made some pretty negligent and stupid decisions in this case.
Criminal and Civil charges/damages have much different tolerances.Same Jurist community that found Rittenhouse not guilty of murder ... is the same community that will hear this lawsuit ... Why would the result be any different ?
I mean if you really want to go with that comparison. We ain’t there. We are on the sidelines sending things to help them. Kyle could have sent a care package and advice instead. That would be the equivalent to our participation with Ukraine.Well his dad and other family lived there so he was there alot. He worked there and had friends thier.
But Ukraine isnt our country by that logic so %99 of us havent been there. We dont work there or have family there so we have no business protecting it from Russia. So F it like Kenosha not our problem right?
I would liken all the weapons to us going in there. We are arming just different people and no matter how you slice it we own that war.I mean if you really want to go with that comparison. We ain’t there. We are on the sidelines sending things to help them. Kyle could have sent a care package and advice instead. That would be the equivalent to our participation with Ukraine.
Kyle rolling in would be the equivalent to us sending a battalion of JROTC to Bahkmut to help support Ukraine.
Not talking so much about the difference between Criminal vs Civil as I am about the jury pools of the community and the mindset that they showed in the criminal trial. I personally don't see much difference in juror's having a different rationale between the two in deciding a civil case !Criminal and Civil charges/damages have much different tolerances.