This idea has merit and will be suggested to the powers that be this week. Stay tuned.
Great! It is after all the crux of the problem.
This idea has merit and will be suggested to the powers that be this week. Stay tuned.
It would also be nice to have some actual teeth to the limitations on the HPRB process. I applied for a "formal appeal" to the HPRB back in August, as one of the pre-stay applicants, and have been soundly ignored since that time.I made a similar plea during my hearing before the review board.
If gay marriage is a freakin' "civil right", then I demand that self-defense be regarded as one also.
It would also be nice to have some actual teeth to the limitations on the HPRB process. I applied for a "formal appeal" to the HPRB back in August, as one of the pre-stay applicants, and have been soundly ignored since that time.
It would also be nice to have some actual teeth to the limitations on the HPRB process. I applied for a "formal appeal" to the HPRB back in August, as one of the pre-stay applicants, and have been soundly ignored since that time.
It would also be nice to have some actual teeth to the limitations on the HPRB process. I applied for a "formal appeal" to the HPRB back in August, as one of the pre-stay applicants, and have been soundly ignored since that time.
I completed my informal review over the telephone. I was denied immediately. I applied for formal review and have heard nothing since.
Exactly. Bob pandered too much and didn't play to his base, and was way too soft on 2A issues when he had the chance. Taxes, fees, whatever Bob all the same, but at least he didn't grow the budget like MOM.
New Hampshire requires G&S ( or whatever thermenology), the goes on to state " Hunting OR Target shooting OR Self-Protection Shall deemed G&S.
I got my training class in... It was the first one offered(BCG&F) after the date I had my application returned. It was offered on the date of my expiration, over a month and a half later. I turned my application in with everything requested in person and had them check it. I asked about the class not be listed on their , online application and she admitted to it being a problem. Now I am in lapse because they cant get their online application fixed. I was immediately infuriated. Knee jerk BS..... their curriculum is just an outline given to instructors to fill with what they want to. The live fire exercise is the only thing they gave explicit instruction on....I just got my renewal returned to me. I need an 8 hour training class to renew a license I already had previously...... I am 60days left to expiration and I was unaware of this requirement and it was not on the application checklist..... Pretty pissed right now!!!!
MSP asked for that guidance over the past couple of years and several legislators have attempted to add legislation to do that very thing, including this year. The attempts this year, in both the House of Delegates and the Senate, were desk-drawered by Vallario & Frosh (presumably at the demand of TPTB) and not permitted a vote in committee, much less on the respective floors.since it is the phrase "good and substantial" that is the poison pill in this legislation.... AND it is specifically up to the MSP to decide what G&S is I was wondering what your thoughts are of the following.
1st don't repeal anything.
2nd have the legislature define G&S.
It seems that this would not only document a legally bind definition so we're not chasing ghost on the applications. It would also go e some thing more concrete to challenge the constitutionality of.
I realize that this might cut both ways, but it might be a start.
Thoughts?