They are actually trying to make the case that public carry of arms was unusual and banned in many places at the founding. That and we're special.
Surprisingly they aren't using Peruta other than the English law references. That tells me they are not going to try to play the open/concealed carry distinction.
Surprisingly they aren't using Peruta other than the English law references. That tells me they are not going to try to play the open/concealed carry distinction.