She advised certain members of the QA central committee that she had support from other members of the QA central committee, when in fact she did not.
If this is proven, is there a provision for a re-vote?
She advised certain members of the QA central committee that she had support from other members of the QA central committee, when in fact she did not.
Moot point!
Congrats Mike!
Not so fast, If I'm reading correctly, he only has won Cecil County. Scott has won Kent and Queen Annes. If mike wins Caroline then it's a tie and guess who the tie breaker is?
Edit, forgot the link http://baltimorepostexaminer.com/audrey-scott-is-surprise-front-runner-in-race-to-replace-pipkin/2013/08/22
MOM, go figure and see where it goes.
So, if Scott can be challenged on her actions in Queen Anne's it's not a moot point.
Someone correct me if I'm wrong.
It is known and provable, no provision for a re-vote that I am aware of.
Does Smigiel "automatically" get Pipken's seat on JPR?
I know assignments can be changed at the Leadership's whim, but if he "keeps" that seat and is instantly removed, that tells a lot too.
MOM would dearly LOVE to hand the seat to Scott.
From what I hear, she is pure RINO, and can be counted on to vote the wrong way on just about any issue.
Whether its Mike, Hershey, or ALMOST any of the others, whatever the counties can do to push this away from Scott is what they need to do.
Our job is to politely suggest to the Republicans, that this is not an acceptable outcome. I am sure they will get the point. In fact I am sure they know this already.
But, in that District, voters have the power to hold her accountable (unless, of course, she's picked to be a one-session landmine)
I have been corrected, there is a provision for a re-vote.
MOM would dearly LOVE to hand the seat to Scott.
From what I hear, she is pure RINO, and can be counted on to vote the wrong way on just about any issue.
Word has it this morning that this race isn't over.
If anyone wants to do something in a last push, there may be time.