The P320 is striker fired. There is no hammer.
Ok rephrasing. I wonder how many article 15s will not be given due to not having a hammer?
The P320 is striker fired. There is no hammer.
Ok rephrasing. I wonder how many article 15s will not be given due to not having a hammer?
I was just being a smart ass.
Army said to have been convinced after this review:
Has MAC thrown it in mud, filled it with ice, and chucked it at concrete yet? Only then can it be army approved.
I think the Glock would have been a better choice, but I'm biased. I feel that any of the finalists would have been better than the M9.
I carried the M9 for 25 years, 5 deployments and used it. Never had a issue, sand, mud and dust, it worked every time I needed it.
Sweet! Maybe Sig will actually start making Caliber Exchange Kits again... I've had a P320 Carry (Full sized grip / Compact sized slide) in 40 since they came out, thinkin I could get a Full, Sub, and a Carry in 9 later on. Zippy chance in finding caliber exchange kits since... I have both a Glock 19 as well, and the 320 hands down, has a better trigger.
Army said to have been convinced after this review:
Quantico tactical has a few