Ruger 10/22 takedown vs M&P 15-22

[giggity]

If you could only pick one which one would you pick and why?

 

[protegeV]

Wow, two completely different beasts. I have a 15/22 and I want a takedown. I'd say 15/22 just bc of the versatility and capacity. The takedown would obviously win on portability.

 

[giggity]

The M&P 15-22 can be easily broken down in two pieces just like an AR so both score pretty good in portability.

 

[protegeV]

The M&P 15-22 can be easily broken down in two pieces just like an AR so both score pretty good in portability.

Yeah it's not hard to break down the 15/22 but the takedown is much quicker. the 15/22 also lends itself to utilization of optics better and it's lighter.

 

[ericoak]

I have both and I would say the difference in putting them together is measured in seconds.

 

[ducrider45]

I have both. The M&P 15/22 MOE would be my choice. Its light, breaks down, adjustable, less internal parts, makes less sound when suppressed and has unlimited options for optics and sights. and its light. did I mention how light it is?

 

[Panzer Radeo]

I have both. I love both. For any kind of walking or traveling on foot/small vehicle, I'd pick the 10/22 TD. For range fun and short camping trips, I'd still probably pick the 10/22TD but the mp15-22 becomes viable. My 15-22 has magpul furniture but my 10/22 has tech sights, an AGP folding stock, and a QD sling. It also fits into my GoRuck with no issues and still has plenty of room left. It really depends on the application you need it for.

 

[rsj1231]

Having owned both, and still own the 15-22, I'd pick the 15-22. I've since bought a Savage FVSR with a Boyd's stock and can say that I enjoy shooting it more than the 10/22. I guess the 10/22 just wasn't for me.

 

[Trumpet]

The longer I own my 15-22 the more I agree that it's the best semi .22 made.

 

[Boom Boom]

I have both. I'd go with M&P15-22 every time.

 

[lax]

Different strokes I guess. Having both I would go with the 10/22. That said the marlin 39 is just as easy to seperate and that would be my choice over either.

 

[Trumpet]

Different strokes I guess. Having both I would go with the 10/22. That said the marlin 39 is just as easy to seperate and that would be my choice over either.

Not arguing there, I was just only thinking of semis

 

[giggity]

I have a 15-22 and a 10/22 but I don't have the TD model. I was thinking about picking one up but I can't decide if it's worth it or not.

 

[Trumpet]

I have a 15-22 and a 10/22 but I don't have the TD model. I was thinking about picking one up but I can't decide if it's worth it or not.

I have to say the new TacSol TD barrel looks pretty slick

 

[jimbobborg]

Does the 15-22 require high-velocity ammunition to function properly? I know the conversion upper I had sold last year required CCI Stingers and such or it wouldn't cycle. The 10-22 worked with Remington Golden ammunition.

 

[SWO Daddy]

If you could only pick one which one would you pick and why?

10/22 every day of the week. One is time-tested, the other has a plastic receiver.

 

[krucam]

10/22 every day of the week. One is time-tested, the other has a plastic receiver.

Yeah, the boards are jammed with complaints on the 15-22...solid logic.

 

[Trumpet]

Yeah, the boards are jammed with complaints on the 15-22...solid logic.

 

[kenpo333]

I've never had a problem with the 10/22's. One is tacticooled and the other is not. Both good firearms, don't have a feel for the smith and wesson.

 

[-Z/28-]

I don't own either, but if I was going to buy one, it'd be the 10/22 takedown. It's just a sleeker platform for a 22 in my opinion. Plus the BX25 mags aren't as bulky as the 15-22 mags.