Maybe if more if this kind of stuff is publicly known the stupidity of these restrictions can be pulled into the light.
TD
TD
Doesn’t matter whether he said hospital or urgent care. He said X-ray. He didn’t say MRI. Doesn’t matter if the X-ray is in a trailer, urgent care or hospital. It’s just an X-ray.
From the original confusion, where the thread title had hospital instead of urgent care.
I checked this morning.
Polozzi is still the corporate Cheik of security for Medstar.
I agree and disagree. I do believe that no matter what you do for a living you should have equal protection, however, an officer in uniform, whether working or on their way home from work, has more of a target on their back. This event was a virtue signaling escapade by a hospital system that is known to be anti 2A. They sent a message which was received.For the record I agree with all of you that the policy is dumb. My only arguments were that an off duty officer shouldn't get any more privilege than a law abiding citizen. The policy is the problem, not the application to this specific dad because of his (work) clothes work while not working. That's all.
It's not a privilege issue. The safety issue angle made some sense. But even that seemed a fairly weak argument for needing some policy that starts at a front door. I can go into a hospital with my work clothes and work tools.For the record I agree with all of you that the policy is dumb. My only arguments were that an off duty officer shouldn't get any more privilege than a law abiding citizen. The policy is the problem, not the application to this specific dad because of his (work) clothes work while not working. That's all.
Literally every medical center/hospital etc that I can think of in the area has a no firearms in buildings policy as far as I can remember. It's been a few years since I was actively going to area hospitals for work, but remember similar policies everywhere I went. Again, I'm not saying I personally agree with the policies, but seems like we are making mountains out of the wrong molehills here. I get it that there's many passionate people here though, so won't keep repeating myself.I agree and disagree. I do believe that no matter what you do for a living you should have equal protection, however, an officer in uniform, whether working or on their way home from work, has more of a target on their back. This event was a virtue signaling escapade by a hospital system that is known to be anti 2A. They sent a message which was received.
Two years ago my sons Medstar pediatrician asked my him if there were any guns in the home and how many, at intake and part of normal questioning (another true story). This is where the appointment promptly ended. Woke anti 2A agenda at its finest.
Where is a "like" button when you really need it?!I hate people
likeWhere is a "like" button when you really need it?!
See above. This is my field expedient 'like' button/'like' button method.like
Only if you have the model from the 80s that could defeat airport metal detectors. Might need the all plastic ammo too though.So Glocks ok in MRI room?
If politicians are trying to pass a law that needs a carve out like that it should be a clear indication that it's a bad law and shouldn't be passed at all.
I was basically agreeing with your statement, #2.So a UNIFORMED police officer with a firearm is now a "carve out"?
You want to talk about off duty/retired LEO's getting carve outs, I'm betting we'd agree on the subject, for reasons I stated earlier. UNIFORMED here is the key, at least for me.
I was basically agreeing with your statement, #2.
I can tell you that if you are on duty, in uniform or plainclothes, no one is going to tell you to disarm yourself.Well, good to know. **** Medstar then. There is no way I'm going to be in uniform unarmed.
For my last MRI I had a Glock 7 in my prison pocket.So Glocks ok in MRI room?