Also, who needed to pick their jaw up from the floor like I did when Lazuick stated that Heller was ONLY in regards to firearms possession in DC?
WTF?
yeah, I heard that too
Also, who needed to pick their jaw up from the floor like I did when Lazuick stated that Heller was ONLY in regards to firearms possession in DC?
WTF?
Also, who needed to pick their jaw up from the floor like I did when Lazuick stated that Heller was ONLY in regards to firearms possession in DC?
WTF?
Me. The trooper waded in way over his head with his characterizations of what the case law stands for. It tells me that they simply don't care to understand, or worse, they do and . . .
WWLRD ?
There is a vacancy on the HGPRB . . .
.... It remains unclear what Mr. Neverdon's role is, but it is clear he exercises some degree of influence over the Board.
YES. Surprised no one had mentioned that yet.
They had made up their mind in "closed session."
The revelations that the colonel presented in his final statements went right over the board's head. He presented his "smoking gun" and they ignored it. This due in large part because they just had no understanding of the facts presented.
I'll defer to the judgement of those who have been around longer to view the process, but IMO the whole makeup of the board is a joke. These people don't even fully understand what they're doing. You may as well put me on a NASA panel about a mission to mars.
Only time I went it appeared he was there to reign in Parliamentary Procedure and make sure no one started practicing law.
Short of that I'd like to see anyone who is NOT prohibited should get a hearing. It was very clear last night that during the two hearings where the applicants were in attendance that they would have liked to add or clarify information but were not allowed to speak.
If a prohibited person applies they should get a review which, short of an expungement of charges, would be very quick.
It takes about 10 minutes to run the background check. It takes about 3 minutes to print the card.
Last night I thought I heard Mr. Neverdon participate at least twice;
First, to call for a closed session.
Then, at the end of the meeting, he actually moved for adjournment.
I thought, except for subjects and witnesses of a hearing, only Board members were allowed to participate?
Also, who needed to pick their jaw up from the floor like I did when Lazuick stated that Heller was ONLY in regards to firearms possession in DC?
WTF?
Caught that. I guess the good trooper thinks that since the Supreme Court is in DC that it only applies to DC....
Last night I thought I heard Mr. Neverdon participate at least twice;
First, to call for a closed session.
Then, at the end of the meeting, he actually moved for adjournment.
I thought, except for subjects and witnesses of a hearing, only Board members were allowed to participate?