The question is who assigns the judges to hear the cases? If it is a court clerk who is personally against 2A rights assigning the judges to the 2A who are against 2A is any law being broken? Just food for thought and wondering.
The question is who assigns the judges to hear the cases? If it is a court clerk who is personally against 2A rights assigning the judges to the 2A who are against 2A is any law being broken? Just food for thought and wondering.
I don't know the records of these three, but it seems in general to be a complete crapshoot with "conservative" judges. I seem to remember some Reagan appointees have been anti-2A.
So we'll wait what - another 10 years for a forced decision
I don't know the records of these three, but it seems in general to be a complete crapshoot with "conservative" judges. I seem to remember some Reagan appointees have been anti-2A.
So we'll wait what - another 10 years for a forced decision
I think they will punt it back to the lower court so they can f around for 2 more years and then another "rule" will allow ANOTHER enbanc with a "more predictable anti gun panel".
Or there will be some other ******** that causes our side to lose.
I the linked. Moonie paper article, they mention that 10 Atty Generals have filed Briefs supporting DC.
Which ones ? Some states are obvious, but I couldn't think of ten states.
I hope to see you there. I've got graying hair on my head & face. Wearing khaki pants & blue button up shirt.
I the linked. Moonie paper article, they mention that 10 Atty Generals have filed Briefs supporting DC.
Which ones ? Some states are obvious, but I couldn't think of ten states.
AMICUS FOR APPELLANT BRIEF [1624590] filed by States of Maryland, California, Connecticut, Hawai’i, Illinois, Iowa, Massachusetts, New York, Oregon, and Washington