Using states makes more sense like using the electoral college makes more sense vs popular vote.
The founders did not like mob rule
The founders did not like mob rule
The Constitution is not subject to a popularity contest.
Our fundamental rights are not to be put to a vote, regardless of the amount of the population who may feel that licenses are good.
It‘s not about the math.
Absolutely Right also .The founders did not like mob rule
And that helps remind people, few of whom even knew this in the first place, that our nation is a union of 50 sovereign entities, each of whom decided to join together as united (adjective, not noun) states to face the outside world as one, but maintained a great deal of their own, individual sovereignty when conducting their own affairs.Using states makes more sense like using the electoral college makes more sense vs popular vote.
The founders did not like mob rule
That's the over riding point ... The Lefty says it is i.e. (Getting rid of electoral college) and the obfuscation of the Constitutions meaning ... The Right says it's interpreted as written ... Antonin Scalia :-: "The Constitution that I interpret and apply is not living, but dead, or as I prefer to call it, enduring. It means, today, not what current society, much less the court, thinks it ought to mean, but what it meant when it was adopted."The Constitution is not subject to a popularity contest.
Our fundamental rights are not to be put to a vote, regardless of the amount of the population who may feel that licenses are good.
It‘s not about the math, or feelings.
The genius of the founding fathers.And that helps remind people, few of whom even knew this in the first place, that our nation is a union of 50 sovereign entities, each of whom decided to join together as united (adjective, not noun) states to face the outside world as one, but maintained a great deal of their own, individual sovereignty when conducting their own affairs.
No kidding, but the clock starts next year that could happen anytime between next year and 5 years.Except that it will take years for the proper case to even get to SCOTUS.
No way that can happen in a year.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Just prior to 1791, common nails that were machine formed and that had striking heads, were taxed and only available through agents of the crown.Thoughts?
It's not going to matter if we lose the court..A left leaning court is going to reverse Bruen..It will be revenge for reversing Roe V WadeI'm ready now. The iron is hot. We could lose the SC next year so better to plan accordingly.
No kidding, but the clock starts next year that could happen anytime between next year and 5 years.
I had the same thought bouncing around in my head.Using states makes more sense like using the electoral college makes more sense vs popular vote.
The founders did not like mob rule
Well then it’s our mission to see that doesn’t happenIt's not going to matter if we lose the court..A left leaning court is going to reverse Bruen..It will be revenge for reversing Roe V Wade