Before Bruen, not possible
After Bruen yes indeed
After Bruen yes indeed
Yeah? And how do you propose we do that? 40+ years of writing sternly worded letters and holding rallies and gun control hasn't changed much in our favor...We finally get a break with Bruen... Gun owners are going to grab their ankles again as soon as the court changes...Well then it’s our mission to see that doesn’t happen
What two justices would be retiring next year??I'm ready now. The iron is hot. We could lose the SC next year so better to plan accordingly.
It isn't just who might retire. Deaths could also wreck things, and none of them re getting younger.What two justices would be retiring next year??
You would have to want to carry without having a permit to have standing. If you have a permit already the most you could ask for until it expires is to be able to carry without the card in your pocket.I hereby volunteer my name in a suit against MD.
I’ll be as famous as Dick Heller!
You would have to want to carry without having a permit to have standing. If you have a permit already the most you could ask for until it expires is to be able to carry without the card in your pocket.
Uhh, extortion?Footnote 9 in Bruen called=out “exhorbitant fees”. What do you call doubling permit fees with no fiscal reason to do so?
Did RGB and Scalia retire?What two justices would be retiring next year??
A hissy fit, but extortion works, too.Uhh, extortion?
Footnote 9 in Bruen called=out “exhorbitant fees”. What do you call doubling permit fees with no fiscal reason to do so?
HB 824
I can't argue against your well thought out logic.Obviously not. Therefore how can carry permits be constitutionally permitted under Bruen?
The HQL was struck down partially because of this.
If an HQL is not permissible, how can any carry permit be permissable?
Thoughts?
OK, what two justices have something on Hillary?Did RGB and Scalia retire?
Footnote 9 in Bruen called=out “exhorbitant fees”. What do you call doubling permit fees with no fiscal reason to do so?
HB 824