Were permits required in 1791?

[swinokur]

Obviously not. Therefore how can carry permits be constitutionally permitted under Bruen?

The HQL was struck down partially because of this.

If an HQL is not permissible, how can any carry permit be permissable?

Thoughts?

 

[FrankZ]

Obviously not. Therefore how can carry permits be constitutionally permitted under Bruen?

The HQL was struck down partially because of this.

If an HQL is not permissible, how can any carry permit be permissable?

Thoughts?

One step at a time. Play the incremental game that has been used against us.

 

[Not_an_outlaw]

One step at a time. Play the incremental game that has been used against us.

I'm ready now. The iron is hot. We could lose the SC next year so better to plan accordingly.

 

[swinokur]

If the state either loses en Banc if they do not appeal, the time is now. This should be MSI’s best time to put a dagger in any permit scheme nationally

Sic semper tyrannis

 

[Stoveman]

If the state either loses en Banc if they do not appeal, the time is now. This should be MSI’s best time to put a dagger in any permit scheme nationally

Sic semper tyrannis View attachment 443184

 

[swinokur]

I hereby volunteer my name in a suit against MD.

I’ll be as famous as Dick Heller!

 

[RJRjr]

Permit to Fornicate under consent of the king?

 

[teratos]

One step at a time. Play the incremental game that has been used against us.

No, it’s time to go for the jugular.

I hereby volunteer my name in a suit against MD.

I’ll be as famous as Dick Heller!

Fvcking Legend…

 

[swinokur]

If we don’t win the WH, this could be our last opportunity

You cannot license an enumerated right

What a way to go. Permits struck down nationally

ATTACK!

 

[FrankZ]

No, it’s time to go for the jugular.


Fvcking Legend…

While I want all the cake back now I keep hearing about patience and how things take time to move through.

Let's kill the NFA, that is the jugular for me.

 

[Cool_Moo5e]

I hope to be here the day permits to carry nationwide are stuck down, we are at what 56% now?

 

[swinokur]

Yes

28 states

 

[owldo]

Did they also charge you any type of fee in 1791 to exercise a Constitutional Right ?

 

[GTOGUNNER]

I hope to be here the day permits to carry nationwide are stuck down, we are at what 56% now?

Not to mention but many states may have it on the books but don’t GAF unless its an add on charge for other criminal activities.

 

[Biggfoot44]

I hope to be here the day permits to carry nationwide are stuck down, we are at what 56% now?

I'm not motivated to do the math at the moment , but if you go by population, the number will be different.

 

[swinokur]

56 per cent is close enough for Constutional use

 

[RFBfromDE]

Did they also charge you any type of fee in 1791 to exercise a Constitutional Right ?

I’m not sure an overturned example like a poll tax would be accepted.

 

[Cool_Moo5e]

I'm not motivated to do the math at the moment , but if you go by population, the number will be different.

I went by states we are at 28 which is 56%, if it's the population I couldn't tell you. You figure California has a massive population and that's one of the hardest states to get a permit in while Wyoming is the least populated state and that's permitless.

 

[Deep Lurker]

I'm not motivated to do the math at the moment , but if you go by population, the number will be different.

The Constitution is not subject to a popularity contest.

Our fundamental rights are not to be put to a vote, regardless of the amount of the population who may feel that licenses are good.

It‘s not about the math, or feelings.

 

[rbird7282]

I'm ready now. The iron is hot. We could lose the SC next year so better to plan accordingly.

Except that it will take years for the proper case to even get to SCOTUS.
No way that can happen in a year.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk