SBR and SRS ruling by MSP

[Inigoes]

This needs to go to the AG ASAP IMO.

Via the Kolbe lawsuit!

The MSP created a sh*tload of harm in the ongoing lawsuit.

 

[fightinbluhen51]

Via the Kolbe lawsuit!

The MSP created a sh*tload of harm in the ongoing lawsuit.

Let them eat cake!

Here is what I don't understand. Convert a rifle, comply with all the nasties...convert a handgun, and its still a handgun.

Help me out here, did the handgun portion of FSA13 have the same features testing?

Further...did this MSP pronouncement just doom the roster board's existence??

 

[erwos]

This needs to go to the AG ASAP IMO.

Already got a draft letter to my delegate; hopefully we'll revise it once and get it out. Legislators don't like it when the MSP seems to ignore them.

 

[NateIU10]

There would appear to be a very simple way to avoid the whole Handgun issue as applied to Form 4 transfers.

 

[erwos]

There would appear to be a very simple way to avoid the whole Handgun issue as applied to Form 4 transfers.

I had thought of some possibilities, but they all had issues at the federal level. PM me if you want to bounce things around.

 

[Ab_Normal]

There would appear to be a very simple way to avoid the whole Handgun issue as applied to Form 4 transfers.

Yep. You could always just steal them like the people who aren't going to follow these laws either.

 

[NateIU10]

Yep. You could always just steal them like the people who aren't going to follow these laws either.

Haha. I meant legally, for everyone involved.

 

[TNW]

Sadly, I don't think I have ever seen a politician offer a solution as to how they were planning on confiscating guns from criminals.

 

[swinokur]

So, according to MSP, an HQL is now required to receive a rifle?

wow.

 

[Ab_Normal]

So, according to MSP, an HQL is now required to receive a rifle?

wow.

Meh. At least they got the bad stuff taken out of the SB281.

 

[clandestine]

So, according to MSP, an HQL is now required to receive a rifle?

wow.

Yup (Unless exempted from the H.Q.L.), and has an approved lock (If made after a certain date), and a 77r/7 day wait, and 1 handgun per 30 days (Unless a D.C), and the Mental Health Form, and the Handgun Roster, and the Fired Shell Casing (If new).

 

[protegeV]

Hrm, where can I find a 12ga bore lock?

 

[erwos]

Hrm, where can I find a 12ga bore lock?

Omega makes 'em, I think.

 

[Engage Armament]

/\
THIS!

I suppose dealers could hand carry the NFA item to the Board, and be present while it was being inspected (e.g.-maintain possession) and then take it back.

Of course, fat chance the Review Board would let that happen.

ATF Form 5 would enable you to transfer it to MSP for the handgun roster board.

 

[NateIU10]

ATF Form 5 would enable you to transfer it to MSP for the handgun roster board.

The board will approve receivers, correct?

 

[Engage Armament]

The board will approve receivers, correct?

Theoretically however getting an AR receiver on there would be problematic. They will respond with either "its not a handgun" or that its prohibited under SB281. We were able to get our pistol on the roster simply because barrel profile and that took an appeal after it was initially deemed being for "LE & MIL Only"

 

[NateIU10]

Theoretically however getting an AR receiver on there would be problematic. They will respond with either "its not a handgun" or that its prohibited under SB281. We were able to get our pistol on the roster simply because barrel profile and that took an appeal after it was initially deemed being for "LE & MIL Only"

Thankfully there is an appeals process. I may just submit one of my spare lowers and see what they say. If they come back with, "it's not a handgun," then we can buy all the Glock, 1911, etc. frames we want as others not on a 77r. If they come back with, "it's banned," we have the courts. I'm tired of getting pushed around on the whim of politicians and their appointees.

 

[Ab_Normal]

Theoretically however getting an AR receiver on there would be problematic. They will respond with either "its not a handgun" or that its prohibited under SB281. We were able to get our pistol on the roster simply because barrel profile and that took an appeal after it was initially deemed being for "LE & MIL Only"

Good. Receivers that have never been assembled as a firearm are not firearms according to the Md statutes.

 

[swinokur]

yowsa

 

[Kingjamez]

So there are approved borelocks for 5.56 & 300 Blackout?