Merlin
Ultimate Member
I guess this means the answer to question 9a will be, "Just because I want it!"
SAF SUES IN MARYLAND OVER HANDGUN PERMIT DENIAL UPDATED 3-5-12
The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast
Member Benefits:
No ad networks! Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership Discuss anti-gun legislation Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses Discover free outdoor shooting areas View up to date on firearm-related events Share photos & video with other members ...and so much more!
Member Benefits:
- Status
The problem with this is that the MSP refuses to mail out fingerprint cards.
Merlin
Ultimate Member
Does the fact there are so many carry states to date make the over turning of these laws less of a BFD?
Merlin
Ultimate Member
Can't you go to any police agency in your area for the cards/prints?
esqappellate
President, MSI
- Feb 12, 2012
- 7,408
Perhaps. Certainly doesn't hurt. But you got to remember that MD is a sovereign and the federal courts like to tread lightly in overturning duly enacted state legislation. Legislation comes with the presumption of constitutionality. Overturning a state law is still a BFD no matter how you cut it.
It is a BFD, since Woollard was the first outside the home ruling.
The antis tried to contain Heller and McDonald to inside the home, Pandora's box is now cracked open. When the CA4 rules, it will be blown open (thinking positively, of course).
Rossi357
Active Member
It only took me 3 1/2 hrs to catch up on these two threads.
WTG Maryland.
California is watching.
WTG Maryland.
California is watching.
Merlin
Ultimate Member
Your right about that. I bet whoever within the MSP could do it over again they wished they gave Mr. Woollard his ccw. Lucky for us they did not bringing us here today. BUT, you just know someone in the MSP wants a do over.
Mr H
Unincited Co-Conservative
Here is what I found with some basic research:
- Statutes - IMO the applicable section would be Public Safety Code, Title 5, Subsection 3 which fails to specify anything about "references".
- Regulations - IMO the applicable section would be Code of Maryland (COMAR) Title 29, Subtitle 03, Chapter 02, Sub-chapter 02 which fails to specify anything about "references". If they are referring to Title 29, Subtitle 03, Chapter 02, Sub-chapter 04, then references are indicated, but no reference is made to time required to know said reference.
Boondock Saint
Ultimate Member
Not to rile up an already impatient crowd, but there's some more good news and information coming your way soon.
Not to rile up an already impatient crowd, but there's some more good news and information coming your way soon.
what?!?! we get free carry guns?!?
aberforth
Lurker
Not to rile up an already impatient crowd, but there's some more good news and information coming your way soon.
Frosh is resigning? MD is giving up the appeal? MD just signed reciprocity with every state in the union?
yellowsled
Retired C&R Addict
Not to rile up an already impatient crowd, but there's some more good news and information coming your way soon.
ZING!
Not to rile up an already impatient crowd, but there's some more good news and information coming your way soon.
Frosh is resigning? MD is giving up the appeal? MD just signed reciprocity with every state in the union?
you forgot owe'malley resigning.
MARYLAND BECOMES OPEN CARRY STATE?!?!? PLEASE MAKE IT SOOOOOOO!
(yeah.. wishfull thinking).
Boondock Saint
Ultimate Member
Frosh is resigning? MD is giving up the appeal? MD just signed reciprocity with every state in the union?
you forgot owe'malley resigning.
Hey, if you're going to wish, you may as well aim high.
BenL
John Galt Speaking.
Not to rile up an already impatient crowd, but there's some more good news and information coming your way soon.
The state has decided not to appeal.
Hey, if you're going to wish, you may as well aim high.
im really shooting for the stars..
If you buy a carry gun, MD will buy you a holster?
- Status
