Picture of the suspect looks way too young to have been legally carrying... but won't know for sure until he is caught.
yeah pretty much this unfortunately. if they'd focus instead on putting and keeping actual violent criminals in jail, our crime numbers would really decrease.They don’t need reasons. They are (mostly) rabid anti-gunners who will infringe at every opportunity and then some.
Romper, bomper, stomper, boo. Tell me, tell me, tell me, do. Magic Mirror, tell me today, did all my friends have fun at play?Miss Sally is looking through her magic mirror from the MGA Romper Room. If she sees (and if we promise) to be good doo-bees, we will all be allowed to have fun at play.
WTF! Have they not made it clear what they want? Each and every year? For the last 50 plus sessions?
Sadly not accurate. I've personally witnessed mechanical failures of firearms that caused a discharge that weren't the operator's fault. Luckily in all cases nobody was being swept by the muzzle at the time.There is a difference between an accident and an incident. An accident is unavoidable. It is impossible for a firearm to accidentally fire. A fact 2A advocates preach to the liberal media daily. Only negligence of the firearm’s operator will cause it to discharge unintentionally. Yes, that individual should have their permit revoked.
White eyed roll back while also fingering gun?I am curious if this guy was carrying in his pocket and no safety on? I mean one in the chamber and no safety.. This carelessness is not good. He should lose his right to carry. Could have easily killed an innocent bystander
He might not have been carrying legally. Who knows.I am curious if this guy was carrying in his pocket and no safety on? I mean one in the chamber and no safety.. This carelessness is not good. He should lose his right to carry. Could have easily killed an innocent bystander
I had a fender bender with the potential of running over a playground full of children. Should I lose my privilege to drive?
?I am curious if this guy was carrying in his pocket and no safety on? I mean one in the chamber and no safety.. This carelessness is not good. He should lose his right to carry. Could have easily killed an innocent bystander
He might not have been carrying legally. Who knows.
. It is impossible for a firearm to accidentally fire.Sadly not accurate. I've personally witnessed mechanical failures of firearms that caused a discharge that weren't the operator's fault. Luckily in all cases nobody was being swept by the muzzle at the time.
Sadly not accurate. I've personally witnessed mechanical failures of firearms that caused a discharge that weren't the operator's fault. Luckily in all cases nobody was being swept by the muzzle at the time.
There are guns that are more likely than others to AD if dropped, including several common C&R revolvers. I guess you could say poor choice of carry firearm, or poor maintenance, is the operator's fault.
Politicians have only one belief; that they must be re-elected.This is my belief. They truly believe that banning guns will make MD safer. They believe it was a sincerity that's immune to any other point of view, reason or fact. They know they can't ban all guns, but they reason that every one they can ban is one that isn't being used in a crime. They ignore the guns already in circulation because they know that confiscation would go badly and they have no other solution.
Make no mistake, the goals of this MGA session are to ban guns, make life hard for police, and something about abortion protections. Welcome to MD.
If it was a cop. That would be in news article. ND/AD by officers automatically generate notifications and OIA investigations. Unless it's mechanical failure the officer would be charged administratively and would likely loose a lot of leave in lieu of a monetary fine.Or quietly, either.
Probably a darn copper.
Hope it didn't hurt your ears.dude shouldn't be aloud to carry anymore.