Pistol Brace Rule - Nation Wide Injunction?

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Worsley

    I apologize for hurting your feelings!
    Jan 5, 2022
    2,939
    Westminster
    The judges oders states "grants the motion and STAYS the rule in it's entirety".

    Edit: .Link to the injunction is in the comment....

     

    Bob A

    όυ φροντισ
    MDS Supporter
    Patriot Picket
    Nov 11, 2009
    31,159
    The interesting bit is the court incorporating "common use" as a big part of the argument. So many nasty machine bits are in common use, from semi-auto anything to magazines of normal capacity to pistol braces.

    I wonder if ATF giving out free tax stamps will turn around and bite them in their SBRs. Anybody have the figures on how many suppressors are currently in "common use"?
     

    DaemonAssassin

    Why should we Free BSD?
    Jun 14, 2012
    24,016
    Political refugee in WV
    The interesting bit is the court incorporating "common use" as a big part of the argument. So many nasty machine bits are in common use, from semi-auto anything to magazines of normal capacity to pistol braces.

    I wonder if ATF giving out free tax stamps will turn around and bite them in their SBRs. Anybody have the figures on how many suppressors are currently in "common use"?
    At least 2 million cans in private hands, last I heard.

    At least 1.5 million SBR's in private hands, last I heard.

    But then again, what do I really know.
     

    Allen65

    Ultimate Member
    MDS Supporter
    Jun 29, 2013
    7,201
    Anne Arundel County
    Seeing lots of chatter arguing over the ruling being 5th Circuit only vs nationwide.
    I believe this one is national because it's not a finding on constitutionality, it's a finding that ATF violated the Administrative Procedures Act, and therefore the rule simply isn't valid because it wasn't within ATF's authority to promulgate it as they did.
     
    Last edited:

    outrider58

    Cold Damp Spaces
    MDS Supporter
    The interesting bit is the court incorporating "common use" as a big part of the argument. So many nasty machine bits are in common use, from semi-auto anything to magazines of normal capacity to pistol braces.

    I wonder if ATF giving out free tax stamps will turn around and bite them in their SBRs. Anybody have the figures on how many suppressors are currently in "common use"?
    SBR- Semi Bare Rumps?
     

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Latest posts

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    275,913
    Messages
    7,300,512
    Members
    33,538
    Latest member
    tyreseveronica

    Latest threads

    Top Bottom