McDonald Decision Date Bounty

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Bigdtc

    Ultimate Member
    BANNED!!!
    Dec 6, 2007
    6,673
    South Carolina
    and despite incorporation, nothing will change... We will see policies put into place to subvert the constitutional guarantees of our natural rights.

    Mark

    I was thinking that too. This ruling is not an "automatic" for us. There will still be some fighting to do... ... I wonder what they'll raise the app fee to in Md.??
     

    ezliving

    Besieger
    Oct 9, 2008
    4,590
    Undisclosed Secure Location
    Mayor Daley Preps For Supreme Court Gun Ban Ruling

    If the high court overturns ban, he said he's ready to jump into action.

    suzanne_lemignot.jpg
    Reporting
    Suzanne Le Mignot

    Forty-eight hours from now, the Supreme Court could overturn Chicago's handgun ban. Mayor Daley says he's ready to act if that happens, as CBS 2's Suzanne Le Mignot reports.

    The mayor said legislation would immediately be introduced in City Council. He said the violence last weekend, 54 people shot, 10 of those people dead, shows the need for the city's handgun ban to remain in place. The mayor also said, taking control of the violence starts with residents, taking a stand.

    Members of New Life Covenant Church and other organizations lined 79th Street, from Dobson to the Dan Ryan Expressway, asked God for mercy on their community -- 3,000 strong with heads bowed.

    "There's power in numbers and we outnumber any gang banger, any drug dealer or anybody with guns," said Pastor John Hannah of New Life Covenant Church.

    Their message, wanting gun violence to end in the city, is not lost on Mayor Daley.

    Monday, the Supreme Court is expected to issue their ruling on Chicago's handgun ban. There's speculation, the ban will be overturned. Daley said legislation would immediately be introduced in city council.

    "Guns are not the answer. Like in a home or outside a home, to solve all the issues confronting people. If allow it, if you allow guns to overtake us, they will overtake you," Daley said.

    "I'm still optimistic they're not gonna overturn it. I think it's getting into the state's ability to govern themselves, but we'll be prepared for that," said Chicago Police Supt. Jody Weis. "We've discussed a lot of options, but we really can't move too far forward, until you really know what you have. The challenge is, once they make this decision, it's in effect immediately."

    Weis on Friday announced that Ernest Brown, the chief of the organized crime division, was promoted to Deputy Superintendent of the Patrol Division, replacing Dan Dugan. But Saturday, Weis said he changed the leadership of his department's patrol division to inject a shot of innovation and bolster officers' ability to forge bonds with community residents to tackle the gang problem and fight crime across the city.

    Ronald Holt lost his son Blair to gun violence in 2007. Holt is now the Director of the CAPS (Community Alternative Policing Strategy) program for the city.

    "Well of course we hope that the Supreme Court does not overturn the ruling because the handgun ban in Chicago is still a tool in the shed, not just for the Chicago Police Department, but for the community as well," Holt said.

    Like Blair Holt, Joyce Hunter's son, Julius Birdine was also shot to death in 2007. Hunter said the Supreme court overturning the city's handgun ban, would mean only one thing.

    "More killing. More killing. More killing. And it needs to stop. It needs to stop. We need to save our youth," Hunter said.

    So does Walter Jacobson.

    When it comes to the safety of young people in the city, the mayor announced a number of new programs, among them, one connecting curfew violators with positive activities and mentoring.
     

    The3clipser

    Mister Tea
    Nov 29, 2009
    1,851
    But, but, the handgun ban! We need it! It's so effective! I mean, all those people being shot aren't being shot with handguns! Oh wait, they are?
     

    BondJamesBond

    Banned
    BANNED!!!
    Nov 2, 2009
    5,001
    and despite incorporation, nothing will change... We will see policies put into place to subvert the constitutional guarantees of our natural rights.

    Mark

    Absolutely true. All a positive opinion in McDonald will do is set a precedent for lawsuits. We will still have to file suit to have bans overturned just like with Heller. Who has the deepest pockets? Don't forget, unlike many (most) of his predicessorrs. Obama has NO PROBLEM criticizing SCOUTUS opinions in his SOTU speech and Congress has no problem trying to overturn the SCOTUS by legislation. McDonald (if in our favor) will ONLY stand until they have an OBAMA court.
     

    krucam

    Ultimate Member
    and despite incorporation, nothing will change... We will see policies put into place to subvert the constitutional guarantees of our natural rights.

    Mark

    Immediately following McDonald, these following dominoes will begin to fall, perhaps within 60-90 days:

    - Palmer v. DC (Bear/Carry in DC) has been on hold, likely pending McDonald. It should now move forward.

    - Nordyke (Ban on gun shows held on CA country property) http://wiki.calgunsfoundation.org/index.php/Nordyke_v._King

    - Sykes (60 day wait after McDonald) Challenging CA carry licencing http://wiki.calgunsfoundation.org/index.php/Sykes_v._McGinness

    - Peña (pending McDonald & Nordyke) Challenging CA's restrictive handgun roster http://wiki.calgunsfoundation.org/index.php/Pena_v_Cid

    If 'Bear' is ruled protected, expect some immediate 'action' on both fronts.
     

    ezliving

    Besieger
    Oct 9, 2008
    4,590
    Undisclosed Secure Location
    Immediately following McDonald, these following dominoes will begin to fall, perhaps within 60-90 days:

    - Palmer v. DC (Bear/Carry in DC) has been on hold, likely pending McDonald. It should now move forward.

    - Nordyke (Ban on gun shows held on CA country property) http://wiki.calgunsfoundation.org/index.php/Nordyke_v._King

    - Sykes (60 day wait after McDonald) Challenging CA carry licencing http://wiki.calgunsfoundation.org/index.php/Sykes_v._McGinness

    - Peña (pending McDonald & Nordyke) Challenging CA's restrictive handgun roster http://wiki.calgunsfoundation.org/index.php/Pena_v_Cid

    If 'Bear' is ruled protected, expect some immediate 'action' on both fronts.
    Sykes pending until after Nordyke. http://www.hoffmang.com/firearms/sykes/038-Order-Continuance.pdf

    Peña pending until after Nordyke. http://www.hoffmang.com/firearms/pena/gov.uscourts.caed.191444.24.0.pdf
     

    pcfixer

    Ultimate Member
    May 24, 2009
    5,955
    Marylandstan
    updated from http://www.scotusblog.com/2010/06/the-final-four-decisions/#more-22266

    The next case is McDonald v. City of Chicago, which presents the question whether the Second Amendment’s right to keep and bear arms is “incorporated” and therefore applies to state and local gun regulation. McDonald was argued in February, and the only Justice not to write from that sitting is Justice Alito. He therefore likely has the Court’s opinion.

    Justice Alito was a member of the five-Justice majority that recognized a Second Amendment right outside the context of militia service in the Heller case. He therefore is a likely vote for finding incorporation. At oral argument in McDonald, Justice Alito seemed quite doubtful about the City’s efforts to suggest a narrow ground for ruling.

    I predict that Justice Alito will write the Court’s opinion in McDonald recognizing that the Second Amendment is incorporated. But given Justice Alito’s sensitivity towards law enforcement, I doubt that the opinion will call into question a broad swath of firearms regulation

    The next case is McDonald v. City of Chicago, which presents the question whether the Second Amendment’s right to keep and bear arms is “incorporated” and therefore applies to state and local gun regulation. McDonald was argued in February, and the only Justice not to write from that sitting is Justice Alito. He therefore likely has the Court’s opinion.

    Justice Alito was a member of the five-Justice majority that recognized a Second Amendment right outside the context of militia service in the Heller case. He therefore is a likely vote for finding incorporation. At oral argument in McDonald, Justice Alito seemed quite doubtful about the City’s efforts to suggest a narrow ground for ruling.

    I predict that Justice Alito will write the Court’s opinion in McDonald recognizing that the Second Amendment is incorporated. But given Justice Alito’s sensitivity towards law enforcement, I doubt that the opinion will call into question a broad swath of firearms regulation

    Sounds like a 5-4 decision to me...:)
     

    Nobody

    Ultimate Member
    Jan 15, 2009
    2,858
    Anyone else feeling like a 10 year old on Christmas Eve? Crap...I don't want to go to bed...the anticipation is killing me.


    Not me, I have resigned to the fact we are screwed with the ruleing tomorrow. I will be extremely happy if I am wrong but IMHO....after tomorrow will be just like yesterday for us.....at least for a few more years.


    NOBODY
     

    teratos

    My hair is amazing
    MDS Supporter
    Patriot Picket
    Jan 22, 2009
    59,847
    Bel Air
    That's called intermediate scrutiny, rational basis...basically all of the non-strict forms of interpretation. All of these lessor forms basically say the same thing: "you rights are limited to what a bunch of politicians think they should be."

    I think it is a given that the politicians will never give up an ounce of power they think they have. That is why the Framer's saw fit to pen the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. They knew we would have a bunch of narrow-minded, bumbling idiots elected to office on promises they had no intention of trying keep usurping as much power as they possibly could. Gosh, those guys were smart.
     

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Latest posts

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    275,638
    Messages
    7,289,373
    Members
    33,491
    Latest member
    Wolfloc22

    Latest threads

    Top Bottom