I don't know when they will they be affirmed or denied.
Word on the Street?
The "word on the street" from Senator Flava Flav is the vote will be Friday.
And before any of you get your panties in a twist, I say that because last year it was the "word on the street", and this year it was "get a flavor for the board".
The board members are "smoove" and he is trying to get a "flava" of what is going on. Lol
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I'm looking for a lawyer for interpretation of my following claim: McFadden questions the nominations at length. He attempted to discuss several cases that are not final. I think this is a separation of powers issue where the legislative branch is trying to tell the executive branch how to do their job or how they should be doing their job. It also seems like an ethics violation to discuss individual cases that are not final....or discuss them at all.
Also, McFadden lives in Maryland and he should know that Maryland is full of people in positions of trust with the government. He completely dismisses the fact that a government IT guy needs protection. When a private company gets hacked, were talking money. When a government agency gets hacked, its a matter of National Security. Think of the power Edward Snowden had as a government IT guy. People incorrectly believe that government positions are equivalent to civilian positions. A fork lift operating for a commercial company may be hoisting cases of Pepsi onto a truck. A government fork lift operating is loading nuclear weapons into a launch tube.
Also, McFadden was concerned that one of the witness for an applicant was an officer of MSI. You would think, in a legislative elected official, that he would respect the fact that a person making claims against the state has a right to bring in a witness that is germane to the issue.
If I were those "MOMS" I would be embarrassed that he was the one listening to them.
I'd like to know if we can get a Sunshine Law Request (Freedom of Information Equivalent in the Federal Government) to see what data he has been getting. I think if we look further, there is probably more unethical happenings going on.
He is an idiot!
Senator Flav and the others should not have been discussing cases that are not final, and they are not final until the applicant receives their permit. This is why Holman, correctly IMO, kept correcting them and using the word hypothetical during his testimony.
Sen Flav and the not ready for prime time players were trying to use recent cases to take away the "I don't recall that particular case" line of defense from the the nominees. Holman made them look foolish and if I were Sen Flav I would go back to the demanding Mommies and ask for better notes next year.
Just finished watching. Looks like the President of MSI is not a popular fellow with the good Senator.
I wouldn't wait around the mailbox for a Christmas card this year.....
I think we now know who monkey boy reports to.