pcfixer
Ultimate Member
And tell your gun owning friends as well.
Yep. Done that
And tell your gun owning friends as well.
Yep. Done that
Maybe we need to have a super rally after this is passed to make the supreme court feel that they need to rule.
Agreed. It definitely needs to be ruled on so we can either put the issue to rest, or start the revolution.
Which SCOTUS case are you thinking of?
As much as you may disagree with my methods, I truly believe my backdoor tactic last Wednesday opened at least one set of eyes in the Senate Commission. Sen. Smith clearly got my message, and he is the committee chair.
The PP and MSI didn't agree with my method, but I went to Analpolis (sic) and spoke my voice. I slept well that night knowing I did what was right.
Bryan W. Simonaire
Brian A. Chisholm
Nicholaus R. Kipke
What exactly was your tactic? I must have missed it!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
This right here. I am sick and tired of all the BS that we have to deal with every year in this state because SCOTUS refuses to rule one way or another. Biggest mistake in Heller was not being precise, but the Courts love that BS. They hate to rule on anything that is not directly before them. They love to have wiggle room later on to change their minds. I think Heller is pretty firm in that the 2nd Amendment protects the use of commonly used weapons for self defense. Pretty sure it protects handguns. Granted, I am sure there is plenty of wiggle room as to exactly what handguns are protected. There is wiggle room in what exactly is protected long gun wise. Let SCOTUS rule on the 2nd Amendment in its entirety as to exactly what it does and does not protect, and then we go from there. Way too much time and money being wasted by both sides to argue about this.
Pretty sure SCOTUS would love to rule on a .22lr handgun. Next case, .28 ACP. Next case, .380. Next case, 9mm. Of course, we all know that the .40 S&W will be protected, along with the .357 Sig, so need for a separate case there.
Then, we can have a case each for single shot capacity, 2 rounds, 3 rounds, 4 rounds, 5 rounds, 6 rounds, etc. until we get to the point where something is unconstitutional. Personally, I believe any capacity limitation is unconstitutional. China or Russia will invade the US before SCOTUS decides it is time to lay the 2nd Amendment issue to rest, in its entirety.
Let's not forget that the 2nd Amendment, while covering self defense, also covers defense from a tyranical government. I should be allowed to own the exact same weapons as the police department and the military.
Rant over.
I became an undercover Moms Demand Action member. I signed up to testify IN FAVOR of the background check bill and somehow ended up on the sponsoring senator's "Panel Of Experts".
I come on around 3:34
http://mgaleg.maryland.gov/mgawebsi...mte=jpr&clip=JPR_2_5_2020_meeting_1&ys=2020rs
Ha that was pretty good. Dude & lady were pissed! Also nice that you can carry 10 stacks around in your pocket!
I became an undercover Moms Demand Action member. I signed up to testify IN FAVOR of the background check bill and somehow ended up on the sponsoring senator's "Panel Of Experts".
I come on around 3:34
http://mgaleg.maryland.gov/mgawebsi...mte=jpr&clip=JPR_2_5_2020_meeting_1&ys=2020rs
All singles- $5 in one hand, $95 in the other.
Yep. Don't forget Heller's "common use test".
Did they ask for the shirt back?
I'm doing my part, told some random people at my grocery store about the tyranny in Annapolis.
Did they ask for the shirt back?