Busted some stuff out back with my son and his friends. So much for that 22 I scores yesterday.
Do you use optics such as aimpoints on your combat shotgun?
We have been laying 2 clays on top of each other on the thrower for years and they separate well. No need for special clays.Wal Mart has nesting clays that seperate when thrown. They look like a lot of fun. I might have to go get a few boxes.
Benelli m4...
saiga12
No speedbead mount availae for it. Bummer
The TR25 has decent battery life. Better than most in that price range. I see it on Amazon for less than $90 on occasion.
Met up with Buddies at MG and spent a couple of hours shooting shotguns.
We compared different combat shotguns. In th lineup were
Benelli m4
Benelli m2
Benelli m1
saiga12 conversion
Keltec KSG
All functioned well and it is hard to pick one over the other. Shot buckshots and slugs. Suprisingly, my shoulder is still attached.
As usual... CrazyAl went full retard on buckshots and slugs.
( btw,no target stands were harmed in this event)
Ill tell you the Saiga really feels good, wish mine had a slightly shorter barrel (got it cheap and converted by the awesome master Chad from its previous owner). May have to have it knocked down to 18.5 and have a little different muzzle break put on it. But it rocks off the shoulder and the gas system soaks up the recoil nicely even with the ACE stock on mine. A little heavy with a 20rd drum but managable.
I love the balance and shoulder meld of the KSG, but I really hate the bolt release forward of the trigger.
Sometimes I wonder if the classics are the best and a good trench gun fixes all issues!
Why didnt you try the Benelli M3? I have always wanted one of those.
The Saigas that we have tested worked well, some had issues with birdshots and feed issues with3" magnums. I also had issues with the magazine sticking out. Its almost impossible to fire this gun from a prone position.
The KSG is okay, but it seems slow and not as fluid as a standard pump. No way to port load to change to slugs. No irons which means, putting rifle sights on a shotgun. Short sight radius.
The M4 is heavy, stock LOP is just stupid at almost 15" with a recoil pad. It digested everything from light birdshots to 3" magnums. Recoil is light an the gun is very fast. The Iron sights are accurate enough for slug use at longer distances. I did weight the gun down by duct taping dead weights on the stock. It still cycled light loads. The same crap would have choked the m2. The ARGO system adds a bit of weight, but the pistons are reliable and soaks up recoil. I can see why the USMC likes this gun.
The M2 seems to be the lightest, easiest to handle, but had issues with light loads as well.it also suffers from the long LOP that Benellis seem to have. It also has a better trigger than the m4 , Awesome ghost ring sights. But recoil is harder than the M4. Inertia guns are also weight sensitive, it much accessories and the gun will jam.
And the M3............ the guy that owns one didnt show up
maybe next time.
.. Ill also bring a SPAS12. But the spas will spas out on light loads or low recoil rounds as well. Its ammo sensitive. But you can always cycle it by manual pump. It is also the meanest looking shotgun ever.
Older WW1 combat pump shotguns do not have disconnectors. US troops would practically keep the trigger depressed and slamfired the gun with each cycle of the slide.
That can be done very fast and resulted in many turks and germans with heads blown off( literally). The US protested this protest....
even up to now.. Military shotguns are mainly anti material weapons. Our troops use it to destroy the enemy's clothing... The devastating wounds it produces is simply... Collateral damage.
Here's an interesting read from WWI regarding combat shotguns