fabsroman
Ultimate Member
Good post!!
One always catches more flies with honey than bitters.
I always try my dashing good looks, dazzling smile, witty charm, and art of persuasion first, before I reach for the baseball bat.
Good post!!
One always catches more flies with honey than bitters.
The word on the street is that Moms Demand Action folks negatively affected their lobbying influence through general rudeness to members of the legislature and their staffs, even among legislators who are otherwise inclined toward gun control. That confirms once again that being a jerk rarely gets you what you want. It confirms as well how essential it is that folks maintain civility if you want to have any chance of changing a mind. It may not work, but maybe next time it might. And even if it never works, a Member who bears resentment because he/she was insulted by rudeness or disrespect will work twice as hard to do in someone who was rude. Thought for the day.
One other huge problem for me is the lying that takes place , I call it lying because it is done on purpose . We see it on the news every night , if they talk facts or listen to facts it would be enjoyable to exchange with them .
Just like the one Delegate lying about the HPRB , where did that lie come from .
Their facts never hold water .
I will go all to Muskets if they get rid of their cell phones and computers , they just don't get 2A or pretend not to understand the Constitution as a whole . They believe it is like a cafeteria where they pick and choose . It is all or nothing or just all & all .
to say that federal law made it illegal for an FFL to perform a NICS check on a ftf transfer was either a lie or a false statement made because the speaker did not know the true answer. Since this statement was made by some on here that I regard pretty highly, and they changed their tune once I showed them an ATF document or two, I believe they were just restating what was told to them in error by somebody else.
Makes a lot of sense. Let them dig their own grave. I guess their emasculated husbands already bend under their weight, they expect everyone to do the same. When they don't get their way they revert back to their natural, inherent rudeness. One can disagree and stand on complete opposite sides but still be respectful. #MDA FEM.
There are lies being told on both sides of the aisle. For instance, to say that federal law made it illegal for an FFL to perform a NICS check on a ftf transfer was either a lie or a false statement made because the speaker did not know the true answer. Since this statement was made by some on here that I regard pretty highly, and they changed their tune once I showed them an ATF document or two, I believe they were just restating what was told to them in error by somebody else.
Most of the time, only the person opening their mouth and speaking actually knows whether they are lying or not. Every once in a while, it is obvious, but not always.
For instance, the client that is telling me the repairs to the kitchen sink are deductible. Is she lying or just misinformed about tax law? I have had conversation after conversation with conservatives that speak complete falsehoods, but I know them personally and know their character. They actually believe what they are telling me. They are quite shocked to hear the truth.
My brother was texting me a couple months ago about this new round that came out, 6.5 Creedmoor. He was telling me about how deadly it is and how expensive precision rifles chambered in it are. He wanted one in a bad way. Tried to tell him that it was not really that new and it is merely a necked down 308 Win, but I think that flew over his head. When we were at the range a month or so ago, Lazzarus found an empty 6.5 case and gave it to me. In turn, I turned to my brother, who was shooting his 308 AR, and showed him the case. Told him "this is a 6.5 Creedmoor case" and then I held it next to one of his 308 rounds. His response was something like, "What the hell, that isn't all that. What the heck are those guys talking about?" So, was he lying to me the month before when we were texting or was he just misinformed?
Education and knowledge is key. An open mind and listening are also helpful.
The word on the street is that Moms Demand Action folks negatively affected their lobbying influence through general rudeness to members of the legislature and their staffs, even among legislators who are otherwise inclined toward gun control. That confirms once again that being a jerk rarely gets you what you want. It confirms as well how essential it is that folks maintain civility if you want to have any chance of changing a mind. It may not work, but maybe next time it might. And even if it never works, a Member who bears resentment because he/she was insulted by rudeness or disrespect will work twice as hard to do in someone who was rude. Thought for the day.
This behavior from their side goes back at least a couple of decades for us now old timers from that period. The names and faces change, but the behavior does not.
The sense of self-righteousness in the moral imperative of their cause makes them arrogant and abusive.
One of the most epic moments from those early days was when the current flavor of the gun banners was Leah Barrett. Ironically her real name was Gail Gunn, but she didn't use that name.
I had a bunch of stickers made up that said, "Who is Gail Gunn and why is she living with Leah Barett's husband?" just to watch her head explode. She would literally dissolve into speaking in tongues just because she couldn't fathom that anyone would disagree with her.
The lulz were also epic the day that they arrogantly came in and put reserved stickers on all of the chairs in the hearing room. I went over to the trooper managing the room and asked if they could do that and he replied "No".
He then took the stickers off and when Leah/Gail came back in they got to see all of us sitting their with our MSI hats on with shit eating grins. She once again went all Exorcist and stomped out of the room in tears.
At the risk of derailing this thread and/or opening a can of worms:
Can an FFL run a NICS check on a gun that is NOT logged into his books. I'm still unclear on this???
Ah, everybody has already forgotten the two finger salute to the committee and then the head of PP posing for a pic with the same person and both giving the two finger salute. Already forgotten the yelling from the galley too.
Yeah, it was ONLY the moms that were rude. lol Luckily for us, it was only the moms that were rude on April 8th.
Then, we have a post here insulting their husbands. Heck, their husbands are probably out earning $1,000,000 a year and happy as hell that their wives have a "hobby" group to keep them occupied. We can all speculate about what their husbands are like.
Seems like the Achilles heel of the left is that their emotions supersede logic. Become adept at button pushing and they'll do all the heavy lifting themselves.
Seems like the Achilles heel of the left is that their emotions supersede logic.
The MDA just ooze “can I speak with your manager?!” smugness and their broken husbands look like the guy who just stands there silent as his wife berates some barista b/c there’s no more almond milk.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Speaking of which, the 6.5 Creedmoor is a modified .30 TC case, not .308
https://www.atf.gov/firearms/docs/n...s-newsletter-september-2013-volume-2/download
https://www.atf.gov/file/110076/download
https://www.atf.gov/file/1661/download
The answer is in there, and I believe the answer is mostly "Yes". There is an exception when NICS comes back delayed AND the seller leaves the FFL's premises with the firearm or when NICS comes back denied.
I was going to sum it all up, but read through that on your own and if you have additional questions, send me a PM.
I’m sure you know what the husbands are like.
To pick just a few incidents where people on my side were rude and not acknowledging the overwhelming majority who weren’t demeans a lot of people. Face it, those on your side are much worse than people on mine.