Participants in this "game" need to be prosecuted for hate crimes.
I am all for the perp getting shot, but I think the CCW holder is going to face some heat.
Shooting someone running away from you?
Yeah they can punch, stab, shock and shoot you then when they run they are home free.
Yea, I was always taught to eliminate the threat.Once the threat is gone, you stop shooting.
Again, this little POS deserved what he got, and I support giving the CCW holder a freaking award, but the courts these days will probably charge him with something. Al Sharpton is probably on his way.
FIFYTeen was only repentive because he got shot and caught. Otherwise he would have been laughing his ass off, jumped back into the van, sipped his tea and ate his skittles, and set out to the next assault.
Sucker punch a "wood" (peckerwood = white person) on the street without warning and for no reason, with the intent of knocking him/her out cold with one blow. One of the killers of the Australian baseball player bragged in a semi-literate tweet about doing it:
Oklahoma Shooter Bragged About Knocking Out “Peckerwoods” After Zimmerman Verdict
A plea-bargain conference was scheduled for last Wednesday, but postponed until Sept. 4. The teen is free on bond.
I am all for the perp getting shot, but I think the CCW holder is going to face some heat.
Shooting someone running away from you?
Pretty much. But with the Govt creating them not reconditioning them.
Yeah and pretty soon here in MD, civil folk will be relegated to carrying ghetto blaster boomboxes with Beethoven's 9th on loop for self-defense.
If you are the driver in a bank robbery, but you never step foot in the bank or even on the property, you are still an accomplice right?
Point being, what I missed in the story is where the other teens in the van were also charged.
Not sure there is a charge for accomplice to possession of an illegal stun gun. And since, apparently, no assault occurred you can't charge them with being involved in that bit either.
IF they wanted to they could charge him with a whole laundry list of crimes. It happens every day with all types of crime.
I am not sure why possession of an illegal stun gun precludes charging him with the assault. They state the former carries a stiffer sentence, which is fine, but two sentences are better than one. And then they have a charge they can get the accomplices on.
Sorry, was there logic in that? Can't have that in the criminal's justice system.
Teen was only repentive because he got shot and caught. Otherwise he would have been laughing his ass off, jumped back into the van, sipped his drank, and set out to the next assault.
Teen was only repentive because he got shot and caught. Otherwise he would have been laughing his ass off, jumped back into the van, sipped his drank, and set out to the next assault.
You guys need help.
You guys need help.