clandestine
AR-15 Savant
Read it wrong.
I'd like to see this get ironed out. There's no reason a company shouldn't be allowed to sell suppressor parts to anyone holding a stamp for a home-made suppressor. I guess the question is, where does enforcement come in to play?
That's just the thing, though:
These aren't suppressor parts. They're flashlight tubes and car parts. If SD Tactical can't sell them to me because they're suppressor parts, then NAPA can't sell me a freeze plug and Home Depot can't sell me a Maglite.
I like how some are so quick to condemn this company for what they were doing. If what he says is true and I have no reason to believe it isn't, they contacted and cleared everything with the ATF. Then after their business became successful the ATF turned around and said," Whoa whoa whoa, you can't do that..." I hope they sue and win for an obscene amount of damages if possible. The older I get the more I believe in gross over reach and incompetency of the ATF and all other agencies as well.
There's no intended purpose for buying freeze plugs and flashlight tubes and end caps from the same company that also makes fully completed suppressors.
But that does NOT make it illegal to sell these things. Arguing otherwise is arguing that you're going to prosecute thought crime or precrime or whatever you want to call it. It is absolute and total ********, and you can't make a rational argument otherwise.
By your argument: I can go to BCM and buy a 16" bbl AR-15. I can also buy a 10.5" barrel upper from them. Should they be shut down too?
I think that once this all comes out in the wash, you're going to find this is going to be just like the Sig Pistol Brace. The BATF was fine with it until they started getting letters asking for clarifications after clarifications. Then they were forced to put an investigative eye on the product.
If people would learn to leave good enough alone, we'd be okay. This company went as far as one could go and were just on this side of being legal. You can say the rules changed on them, but I'd prefer to say that it's like the homeowner complaining about speeders on their neighborhood roads. The police won't do anything about it until they get a complaint.
Just one man's opinion.
But that does NOT make it illegal to sell these things. Arguing otherwise is arguing that you're going to prosecute thought crime or precrime or whatever you want to call it. It is absolute and total ********, and you can't make a rational argument otherwise.
By your argument: I can go to BCM and buy a 16" bbl AR-15. I can also buy a 10.5" barrel upper from them. Should they be shut down too?
If you don't have a second lower, then the ATF can claim Constructive Intent.
They can say you could easily put your 10.5 inch barrel on your fully stocked AR-15 rifle. Thereby manufacturing an SBR without having the proper stamps.
And you might not want to say BS outside the Water Cooler.
That's a reason many give for building it into a pistol first then submit your paperwork for a SBR.
If you don't have a second lower, then the ATF can claim Constructive Intent.
They can say you could easily put your 10.5 inch barrel on your fully stocked AR-15 rifle. Thereby manufacturing an SBR without having the proper stamps.
And you might not want to say BS outside the Water Cooler.
It is my understanding that if you have a single tax stamp for a SBR AR-15, barrels can be switched on and off of it so long as no barrel is shorter than that put on the stamp? Am I correct about this? Can't I use a 12.5" 5.56 upper on my lower that has a tax stamp for a 10.5" .300 BLK barrel?
It is my understanding that if you have a single tax stamp for a SBR AR-15, barrels can be switched on and off of it so long as no barrel is shorter than that put on the stamp? Am I correct about this? Can't I use a 12.5" 5.56 upper on my lower that has a tax stamp for a 10.5" .300 BLK barrel?
I understand the entire constructive intent argument, and I think that is some complete garbage too. There are plenty of people that can unknowingly run afoul of constructive intent. Thing is, the ATF isn't going door to door looking for gun owners that just so happen to own a lot of tools. A plumber that also happens to be a gun owner, who happens to buy some freeze plugs, is looking at a constructive intent issue.
It is my understanding that if you have a single tax stamp for a SBR AR-15, barrels can be switched on and off of it so long as no barrel is shorter than that put on the stamp?
Won't be long now before the anti-gunners come up with these scenarios:
1. Have a hacksaw in your shed and own a AR? We can't have that you could potentially be in possession of an SBR!
2. Do you own a drill press and a scary looking .22lr rifle that has a barrel shroud? You might just be in possession of a illegal weapon due to the potential to make it suppressed. We'll take that from you!
3. Do you own a vertical grip and an AR pistol? We cannot have you potentially putting that on that AR pistol so it now belongs to us. Actually just give us your whole firearms collection while you are at it because you are in violation of NFA rules.
If you give them an inch they will take a mile. The rules that the B.A.T.F. are coming up with are so ridiculous that people actually think it's justified. Yup, by you simply just shouldering an AR pistol with a Sig Brace you have just somehow magically changed the configuration of that weapon & have thereby re-manufactured it!
So, what does one do now if they pay the stamp tax on a Form 1 and want to build their own suppressor? Guess the cheaper route has been taken away...for now anyway.
Buy assault freeze plugs (AFPs) from NAPA.
Then go to a machine shop and have them manufacture a tube and plugs based on the diameter of the freeze plugs.
Just don't get all giddy and tell the machine shop what the parts are for.