Boondock Saint
Ultimate Member
The pox is here. They just want to rename it.
A shame that more grabbers aren't coming down with it.
The pox is here. They just want to rename it.
So they’ll just regurgitate the same losing arguments in Bruen.Good cliff notes of NY’s response to this suit. These tactics will be used elsewhere.
New York Uses Historic Gun Bans Against Native Americans, Catholics to Justify Current Restrictions in Court Filing
The Empire State believes its gun-carry restrictions are similar to racist gun bans from the past, and that’s why they should be upheld.thereload.com
So they’ll just regurgitate the same losing arguments in Bruen.
The good moral character is probably something that can’t be challenged unless someone gets denied I assume
If you pass a background check you are of good moral character
One is objective. The other subjective
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The sensitive places are another matter.They can because good moral character is a subjective determination and not objective. Why? because good moral character is a matter of opinion and not fact.
Uf you read the entire complaint, that is not the only item they are challenging either. They are challenging all of the "sensitive places" that they added with the new law that were allowed before but wont be after September First.
The sensitive places are another matter.
The GMC could be used like May issue. Then again it may not.
The reason numerous states and localities that were statutorily May issue never got sued was because you couldn’t get standing.
It’ll be the same for GMC.
A lot of total scumbags pass background checks. They gave me a gun, after all.
You own a gun??!! A real gun??!!
I wasn’t aware the district court said plaintiffs in Bruen didn’t have standing?Look at the Bruen case closely. It got dismissed for lack of standing. It was appealed, all the way to SCOTUS. NY tried to argue to get it sent back down to district court to be heard and over rule the dismissal.
However SCOTUS chose not to do that and issue an opinion instead. Many different ways to get a case in front of SCOTUS. This case may end up in front of them over the Injunction.
Sure... The CAC or even En Banc panel could dismiss the case. NY is still trying to have this case dismissed. However he will appeal to the SCOTUS even if the case is reversed and dismissed by CAC or En Banc. SCOTUS will then issue another opinion. SCOTUS wont let this one slide. SCOTUS already is pissed at NY for the prior NY case with NYC and the case being mooted.
Also keep in mind this judge at the district court level is the East Coast version of St Benitez on the west coast.
Like i said though, the biggest issue will come with the CAC and En Banc panels.
How does that not now fall under "racism?"Good cliff notes of NY’s response to this suit. These tactics will be used elsewhere.
New York Uses Historic Gun Bans Against Native Americans, Catholics to Justify Current Restrictions in Court Filing
The Empire State believes its gun-carry restrictions are similar to racist gun bans from the past, and that’s why they should be upheld.thereload.com
I wasn’t aware the district court said plaintiffs in Bruen didn’t have standing?
On this case there’s quite a bit they’re challenging. IIRC plaintiff has a permit so GMC hasn’t disqualified him so he may lack standing on that point.
Sensitive places are easily fair game IMO. He’s clearly harmed by the new law.
I just red flagged you.Wild, right?!
Finally!I just red flagged you.