Antonyuk and Gun Owners of America vs Bruen

[Boondock Saint]

The pox is here. They just want to rename it.

A shame that more grabbers aren't coming down with it.

 

[swinokur]

Dr Fauci should create a new variant

Small monkey pox


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[ShafTed]

If this was America, Albany would already be swarming with U.S. Marshals, carrying thick stacks of arrest warrants, with a fleet of school busses to transport prisoners. But, under the present administration, this is no longer America.

 

[DC-W]

Good cliff notes of NY’s response to this suit. These tactics will be used elsewhere.

New York Uses Historic Gun Bans Against Native Americans, Catholics to Justify Current Restrictions in Court Filing

The Empire State believes its gun-carry restrictions are similar to racist gun bans from the past, and that’s why they should be upheld.

thereload.com

 

[press1280]

Good cliff notes of NY’s response to this suit. These tactics will be used elsewhere.

New York Uses Historic Gun Bans Against Native Americans, Catholics to Justify Current Restrictions in Court Filing

The Empire State believes its gun-carry restrictions are similar to racist gun bans from the past, and that’s why they should be upheld.

thereload.com

So they’ll just regurgitate the same losing arguments in Bruen.
The good moral character is probably something that can’t be challenged unless someone gets denied I assume

 

[Texasgrillchef]

So they’ll just regurgitate the same losing arguments in Bruen.
The good moral character is probably something that can’t be challenged unless someone gets denied I assume

They can because good moral character is a subjective determination and not objective. Why? because good moral character is a matter of opinion and not fact.

Uf you read the entire complaint, that is not the only item they are challenging either. They are challenging all of the "sensitive places" that they added with the new law that were allowed before but wont be after September First.

 

[swinokur]

If you pass a background check you are of good moral character

One is objective. The other subjective


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[DC-W]

If you pass a background check you are of good moral character

One is objective. The other subjective


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

A lot of total scumbags pass background checks. They gave me a gun, after all.

 

[swinokur]

Exactly what I meant to say

Objective except for scumbags like you


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 

[Texasgrillchef]

Lets think positive though.

The judge in this case is republican appointed by Bush. Thats a better sign then him being a demorat.

That being said he has denied an extension to NY. He also wants to issue his order of denial or grant of the injunction.

Odds are he is already planning to grant the TRO injunction or he would have granted the extension to NY to come up with more reasons to dismiss or deny the plaintiffs motions.

We will know by the 1St if its granted or denied.

It wont give the state much time to file an emergency appeal and motion for a stay with the CAC. Thats the real kicker. Lets see if CAC grants the stay, or actually follows Bruen.

 

[press1280]

They can because good moral character is a subjective determination and not objective. Why? because good moral character is a matter of opinion and not fact.

Uf you read the entire complaint, that is not the only item they are challenging either. They are challenging all of the "sensitive places" that they added with the new law that were allowed before but wont be after September First.

The sensitive places are another matter.

The GMC could be used like May issue. Then again it may not.
The reason numerous states and localities that were statutorily May issue never got sued was because you couldn’t get standing.
It’ll be the same for GMC.

 

[Texasgrillchef]

The sensitive places are another matter.

The GMC could be used like May issue. Then again it may not.
The reason numerous states and localities that were statutorily May issue never got sued was because you couldn’t get standing.
It’ll be the same for GMC.

Look at the Bruen case closely. It got dismissed for lack of standing. It was appealed, all the way to SCOTUS. NY tried to argue to get it sent back down to district court to be heard and over rule the dismissal.

However SCOTUS chose not to do that and issue an opinion instead. Many different ways to get a case in front of SCOTUS. This case may end up in front of them over the Injunction.

Sure... The CAC or even En Banc panel could dismiss the case. NY is still trying to have this case dismissed. However he will appeal to the SCOTUS even if the case is reversed and dismissed by CAC or En Banc. SCOTUS will then issue another opinion. SCOTUS wont let this one slide. SCOTUS already is pissed at NY for the prior NY case with NYC and the case being mooted.

Also keep in mind this judge at the district court level is the East Coast version of St Benitez on the west coast.

Like i said though, the biggest issue will come with the CAC and En Banc panels.

 

[hodgepodge]

A lot of total scumbags pass background checks. They gave me a gun, after all.

You own a gun??!! A real gun??!!

 

[DC-W]

You own a gun??!! A real gun??!!

Wild, right?!

 

[swinokur]

Unspeakable evil


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 

[press1280]

Look at the Bruen case closely. It got dismissed for lack of standing. It was appealed, all the way to SCOTUS. NY tried to argue to get it sent back down to district court to be heard and over rule the dismissal.

However SCOTUS chose not to do that and issue an opinion instead. Many different ways to get a case in front of SCOTUS. This case may end up in front of them over the Injunction.

Sure... The CAC or even En Banc panel could dismiss the case. NY is still trying to have this case dismissed. However he will appeal to the SCOTUS even if the case is reversed and dismissed by CAC or En Banc. SCOTUS will then issue another opinion. SCOTUS wont let this one slide. SCOTUS already is pissed at NY for the prior NY case with NYC and the case being mooted.

Also keep in mind this judge at the district court level is the East Coast version of St Benitez on the west coast.

Like i said though, the biggest issue will come with the CAC and En Banc panels.

I wasn’t aware the district court said plaintiffs in Bruen didn’t have standing?
On this case there’s quite a bit they’re challenging. IIRC plaintiff has a permit so GMC hasn’t disqualified him so he may lack standing on that point.
Sensitive places are easily fair game IMO. He’s clearly harmed by the new law.

 

[jc1240]

Good cliff notes of NY’s response to this suit. These tactics will be used elsewhere.

New York Uses Historic Gun Bans Against Native Americans, Catholics to Justify Current Restrictions in Court Filing

The Empire State believes its gun-carry restrictions are similar to racist gun bans from the past, and that’s why they should be upheld.

thereload.com

How does that not now fall under "racism?"

 

[Texasgrillchef]

I wasn’t aware the district court said plaintiffs in Bruen didn’t have standing?
On this case there’s quite a bit they’re challenging. IIRC plaintiff has a permit so GMC hasn’t disqualified him so he may lack standing on that point.
Sensitive places are easily fair game IMO. He’s clearly harmed by the new law.

He does have standing when it comes time to renew his license because all of the new requirements are required for renewals as well. Especially the training.

He will have to renew before this case comes to an end. Especially if NY use every tactic they can to delay the case.

However if the Injunction TRO stands and doesn't get stayed. Then NY might want to rush this through to the end.

My personal opinion though is that they did this simply because this is an election year. After the election they wont try so hard. They know the law is unconstitutional, they know SCOTUS will overturn it even if the En Banc pannel upholds it.

But if you look at past statistics The 2nd circuit court and the En Banc panels are not near as defiant as the 9th circuit.

What i also suspect is that the 2nd CAC will uphold the TRO and En Banc will be denied. When it gets to SCOTUS NY's Petition will get denied. Why do I say that? Is because if they force us to file a petition for cert with SCOTUS then SCOTUS may grant, and issue an opinion then things only get worse with another opinion. (For them)

Its the reason NY and CA pushed DC NOT to take Wrenn v DC to the supreme court.

 

[teratos]

Wild, right?!

I just red flagged you.

 

[DC-W]

I just red flagged you.

Finally!