Several things that need to be asked:
What is Sgt Bonnell's purpose and reason for sitting at the table? He isn't the investigating trooper in most of the cases.
Why isn't the investigating trooper present for those appeals that come before the HPRB?
Who is the third trooper and his purpose at the table?
Applicants have been required to introduce their witnesses for the record, why doesn't MSP have to do the same for all three at the table?
If Sgt Bonnell and the other trooper have had nothing to do with the applicant's application, why and how can they testify for MSP?
It would be interesting for an applicant that is appealing their denial, request the board excuse and not permit those MSP employees who have had no direct activity on the permit application, to testify on behalf of MSP for that permit appeal.
What is Sgt Bonnell's purpose and reason for sitting at the table? He isn't the investigating trooper in most of the cases.
Why isn't the investigating trooper present for those appeals that come before the HPRB?
Who is the third trooper and his purpose at the table?
Applicants have been required to introduce their witnesses for the record, why doesn't MSP have to do the same for all three at the table?
If Sgt Bonnell and the other trooper have had nothing to do with the applicant's application, why and how can they testify for MSP?
It would be interesting for an applicant that is appealing their denial, request the board excuse and not permit those MSP employees who have had no direct activity on the permit application, to testify on behalf of MSP for that permit appeal.