laws and AR build

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Biggfoot44

    Ultimate Member
    Aug 2, 2009
    33,314
    Even if we ignore NFA and FSA 13, heck even if we do a pistol build, there is big issue with a 1.0 inch bbl.

    Nasty fragments when firing a 2.25-ish ctg from it.
     

    Hawkeye

    The Leatherstocking
    Jan 29, 2009
    3,971
    A 15" perm-attached muzzle device lol (to get around NFA)

    LOL, someone do an illustration.

    Theoretically, sure.

    TacSol actually sells a .300BLK upper that's like an 8.5" barrel with an 8" permanently attached shroud on it. You slip a suppressor inside the shroud and it threads to the barrel. No NFA anything on the rifle itself since technically the barrel + permanent muzzle device is over 16".
     

    tkd4life

    Ultimate Member
    Sep 10, 2010
    1,737
    Southern Maryland
    So I understand that some are saying that a barrel marked HBAR or commercially sold as HBAR is legal. Is there anything from stopping a barrel maker from turning a barrel to 0.002" over government spec in tactically relevant positions on the barrel and slapping the stamp HBAR on the barrel?
     

    Hawkeye

    The Leatherstocking
    Jan 29, 2009
    3,971
    So I understand that some are saying that a barrel marked HBAR or commercially sold as HBAR is legal. Is there anything from stopping a barrel maker from turning a barrel to 0.002" over government spec in tactically relevant positions on the barrel and slapping the stamp HBAR on the barrel?

    Nope.

    Unfortunately, since "HBAR" isn't defined anywhere in the law, there is also nothing to prevent MSP from coming up with some other arbitrary and capricious way of defining it, either.
     

    noahhh

    Active Member
    Jan 28, 2009
    254
    Arnold,Md
    I recently built a MD-compliant rifle with 20" H-Bar. It came in at a tad over 8 pounds. Then I added a Vortex Crossfire II scope 1-4 w/V-brite reticle (which I'm loving) and the weight is now 9+ pounds. Holy mackerel! It's good that all I ever plan to do with it is shoot it off the bench now and then, so in the end I'm not too upset. (Especially since it is a well under MOA gun the way it sits.) If I build another one it'll be with a 16 or 18" fluted heavy barrel.
     

    mopar92

    Official MDS Court Jester
    May 5, 2011
    9,513
    Taneytown
    So I understand that some are saying that a barrel marked HBAR or commercially sold as HBAR is legal. Is there anything from stopping a barrel maker from turning a barrel to 0.002" over government spec in tactically relevant positions on the barrel and slapping the stamp HBAR on the barrel?

    Technically the very first experimental AR's had a .5" profile barrel (IIRC). They experienced barrel bursting issues and drooping issues after FA fire. Sheer technicality the Gov't profile is an HBAR. Also in the stupid AR HBAR category a Colt 6920 SOCOM carbine is MD legal but a BCM SOCOM carbine isn't because Colt advertises the 6920 SOCOM as an HBAR whereas BCM doesn't.
     

    Magnumite

    Ultimate Member
    Dec 17, 2007
    6,586
    Harford County, Maryland
    Weight isn't the worst part with a 20" HBAR. The balance is rough with a light stock. I tried a collapsible stock with a 20" HBAR upper and had to put lead shot in the battery storage cavities to get decent balance.
     

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Latest posts

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    275,668
    Messages
    7,290,620
    Members
    33,500
    Latest member
    Millebar

    Latest threads

    Top Bottom