Kharn
Ultimate Member
Norton,
Some groups are one trick ponies striving for relevance anywhere they can find it.
Some groups are one trick ponies striving for relevance anywhere they can find it.
IIRC the rules of the House allows the sponsor to withdraw the bill, preventing a vote.If we can figure out that HB45 passage might moot the ruling, might the GA come to the same conclusion and pass it just to moot the ruling?
72 HOURS?
The info on the MSP website says that the prints are good for 30 days?
Like usual I'm confused.
It means nothing for Constitutional Carry in Maryland because this is totally unrelated to the topic. There is nothing, anywhere in this ruling that directs us towards Vermont style (ie Constitutional) carry.
“A citizen may not be required to offer a `good and substantial reason’ why he should be permitted to exercise his rights, The right’s existence is all the reason he needs.”
I'm lost here on HB45, isn't it kinda doing the same thing that the ruling did? If it were to pass and remove the G&S reason why would it make the ruling moot since it was passed after the ruling, wouldn't it just reinforce the ruling in a sense? I'm so confused.
IIRC the rules of the House allows the sponsor to withdraw the bill, preventing a vote.
If we can figure out that HB45 passage might moot the ruling, might the GA come to the same conclusion and pass it just to moot the ruling?
That makes it a little clearer.HB45 does not remove the G&S requirement, it just says that the MSP must find your G&S instead of the applicant supplying the data.
So how hard do you think the MSP will look for a G&S reason for you to carry a gun?
Fox and Hen House.
it shouldn't matter whether the burden of G&S is shifted to the MSP, G&S was ruled unconstitutional. HB45 is simply furthering, though altering slightly, the same unconstitutional principle.
I don't see how it can moot a rendered decision.
it shouldn't matter whether the burden of G&S is shifted to the MSP, G&S was ruled unconstitutional. HB45 is simply furthering, though altering slightly, the same unconstitutional principle.