- Dec 20, 2013
- 12,340
That's my understanding, too.58: has the orig chrome lined barrel.
2008: dont.
58: orig barrel is something like 15.5". They have to pin a short muzzle device to get to >16"
2008: barrel is made >16"
58: bayonet lug ground off (import issue?) (note, a new front sight w/ lug is ~$20 on the web but you'll have to unpin muzzle device, replace sight, repin. If adding a brake, its a convenient time to do it.)
2008: has bayo lug
58: CZ made receiver which Czechpoint USA mills out to accept standard mags (like how arsenal AKs are brought into the country)
2008: Don't know who century gets to make theirs but its surely US.
Not sure what internal parts/trigger groups the 2008 is using. I should be able to compare side by side in about two weeks.
Just got back from the range with mine and I was hitting 3" groups easily from 50'.
I've only encountered two problems with this rifle: 1) upon receipt, the trigger was extremely stiff. I don't have a gage, but probably ~15 pounds. It was so stiff that my finger hurt after pulling it three or four times; and 2) the front grips get blazing hot after ~25 rounds (I generally wear a glove on my left hand, so that isn't a big deal tho').
I was able to easily remedy the stiff trigger by slightly collapsing one its two leaf springs until I had the trigger I wanted. Now, it's about perfect with a nice break.
Leaf sights tend to make me cranky. So, in this case, I replaced the OEM leaf with an aftermarket peep sight and its sight picture is very Garand-like. In fact, it's more Garand-like than the Garand....a good thing. I'd say hit accuracy's now limited by the sights and not the gun.
I also found that the muzzle break it comes with appears to be designed for an AK, with its lower tongue centered around 5 o'clock (i.e., slightly off-center) to counter the slight twisting torque from the AK's rotating bolt (the vz's bolt doesn't rotate; it slides). So I got a coupla replacement breaks: one, which is similar to the original, but with its tongue correctly centered at 6 o'clock; and, the other, a higher end break, which is what's currently on the gun in the photos. A bit pricey, but it does a good job of eliminating most of the muzzle lift and mitigating some of the recoil. The result is that the rifle feels more like an AR-10 than a Kalashnikov, which is what it originally felt like.
Overall, I'm more than pleased with the '2008. I've got a pretty good stockpile of non-corrosive Wolf ammo and always clean-up right after shooting. Tho' time'll tell whether the lack of a chrome lined barrel will prove a shortcoming or not.
Attachments
Last edited: