dgapilot
Active Member
So we didn't get much this year, and I would presume that most of what was proposed this year will be proposed again next year. One of the things that really gets me is the difference between Federal and State law and how easy it is to get in trouble without even knowing. As the general public, we aren't lawyers and some times it's really hard to make sense of all the dos and don'ts of firearms transfers.
In the FSA 2013 they made an exception to the HQL for C&R transfers. How about makeing a proposal that would bring intrastate transfers of C&R items to holders of a FFL03 the same as interstate transfers. As it stands now, MD gun stores are loosing revenue on C&R transfers they aren't doing, since it is easier to buy out of state than in state. Likewise (not that I really care) the state is loosing out on sales tax revenue on out of state transactions that might otherwise be done in state if the same rules applied.
Before I send this request to my local deligate I'd like feedback here.
In the FSA 2013 they made an exception to the HQL for C&R transfers. How about makeing a proposal that would bring intrastate transfers of C&R items to holders of a FFL03 the same as interstate transfers. As it stands now, MD gun stores are loosing revenue on C&R transfers they aren't doing, since it is easier to buy out of state than in state. Likewise (not that I really care) the state is loosing out on sales tax revenue on out of state transactions that might otherwise be done in state if the same rules applied.
Before I send this request to my local deligate I'd like feedback here.