SB1 (2023) - Criminal Law - Wearing, Carrying, or Transporting Firearms - Restrictions (Gun Safety Act of 2023)
- Thread starter dblas
- Start date
The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast
Member Benefits:
No ad networks! Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership Discuss anti-gun legislation Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses Discover free outdoor shooting areas View up to date on firearm-related events Share photos & video with other members ...and so much more!
Member Benefits:
Those were well thought questions from Senator Muse. I feel like there are a number of dems who have serious reservations about this bill. Both yesterday's version and today's totally changed version. I will hope SB1 goes down, but I have the suspecting they will shove this one through. Probably not as is.
You often know you done Fooked UP when the office of the public defender calls you out on unconstitutional laws.
Didn't MSP earlier basically say this will prohibit carry in effect in the entire state?
WBAL News story...
www.wbaltv.com
.
Sent from my SM-G781U using Tapatalk
Hundreds lobby Annapolis over gun rights across Maryland
Hundreds of people signed up to testify before a Senate panel to oppose gun safety bills, and only three were in favor.
www.wbaltv.com
.
Sent from my SM-G781U using Tapatalk
Yes, yes they did.
I'm torn between wanting SB001 to not pass and wanting it to be nullified by the court. My thought is that if it doesn't pass, we will keep seeing it creep up every year. Whereas if it is nullified by the court, it may be less apt to show up year after year.
There will probably be at least one more major revision. And we've heard nothing about the House's intent on this one, and how much "softening" of the bill they'd accept.
What ultimately happens depends mostly on how much political capital the Party leadership is willing to expend on it. Obviously Waldstreicher is all in. But others may not be.
Bertfish
Throw bread on me
I think it's telling that there is no House version
I know it's not needed but normally they try to DP us if they really want things done
So, if we defeat it this year, we have an entire year of similar laws from NY and NJ that are being challenged, to fall, and hopefully show that these bills are failures.
On the other hand, pass the bill so we can get this party started in our own Circuit and put this to bed, since rulings in the 2nd Circuit hold no sway here in the 4th Circuit.
It's not needed, but it allows members of the opposite chamber to claim sponsorship of the same ideas.
I'd prefer it not pass and leave us the F alone. I think NY and NJ will get smacked down hard enough by SCOTUS in the next 2 years to make it clear to MD what they can and cannot do. Including that probably many of the current carry restrictions are not constitutional. Sensitive places restrictions being codified by SCOTUS is coming. If it is going to pass in any form, then let's make it as bad as it can so not even a remotely stupid or bought and paid for judge will frown at MGA and through the whole thing out in a heartbeat.
But we still need to kick out some of the current crap like you can't carry in state forests or parks.
At least one more revision, and then countless Amendments.
Then the House gets to shred it.
I get the feeling that a few think that this bill isn't worth the squeeze.
Can we not make references to the Maryland general legislature spit roasting us? That's really not an image I really needed.
SB281 from 2013 was a single chamber bill.
elwojo
File not found: M:/Liberty.exe
From the questions being asked, it is certainly going to get ground up in committee, if it even makes it out of the drawer.
Thanks for the assist. I completely forgot about 294 since it was not true cross file.
That we even have to hope for that outcome sickens me.
@dblas I saw your testimony while I was at The Gooch's gymnastics practice. Real smooth bruh.
Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk
Bertfish
Throw bread on me
I didn't realize that. Yay.
