These carry permit’s.
Are people certified by the instructor or just trained and or qualified. What does the final say once issued?
Are people certified by the instructor or just trained and or qualified. What does the final say once issued?
The market is the traditional protection. Bad YELP reviews are more effective that the gorilla of having MPTC 'managing' 3,000 instructors.I'd h
I'm not arguing for it. I do think there needs to be some type of consumer protection though.
Yeah I can see these high maintenance instructors dropping a dime on other trainers . That is the world we live in because they are better.The market is the traditional protection. Bad YELP reviews are more effective that the gorilla of having MPTC 'managing' 3,000 instructors.
MSP is already capable of having Troopers 'audit' a specific instructor based on COMPLAINTS.
The instructor CERTIFIES that the student passed the required training.These carry permit’s.
Are people certified by the instructor ...
Legislating quality and responsibility is a fool's errand as we all knowUnder current LAW, any QHIC instructor can simply hand out the 72 page PDF issued by MSP and tell war stories and c@ck measuring contests for 15 hours, have each student shoot 15 rounds into the designated target ans sign a 29-14 and send people on their way. (Class size 800 seats at a conference room)
Another instructor could conduct death-by-powerpoint lecture for 15 hours (or 8, 10, etc), have students fire 1,000 rounds on the firing line and sign the exact same 29-14 and be done. (Class size 1.)
The statute and regs don't define 'quality' instruction, don't specify a instructor-to-student ratio, don't specify a round count.
And we don't want-or need- regulatory specificity.
Legislating quality and responsibility is a fool's errand as we all know
The bill passed out of committee, the amendment we care about was removed.Can someone give me the latest on the bill, is it done . I seen a earlier post saying some stuff passed and maybe it will be snuck in ?
Is Tim Otwell a member here under a different handle ?
How do you see it ? Is it worth sending another email to McKayThe bill passed out of committee, the amendment we care about was removed.
But, it could be added during 2nd reader on the Senate floor.
It could be added in Committee in the House.
It could be added during 2nd or 3rd reader on the House Floor (if it gets that far)
That’s what women on target is all about.I’d like to point out something not yet discussed in this thread. I am now training my teenage daughter, and I have observed many new shooters at the range. Most teenage/20 something girls would be more comfortable learning from another young girl than an older dude with a ton of credentials.
No disrespect to the older dudes with credentials, but a young girl is not going to be comfortable with an older dude standing two feet behind her constantly saying “your thumbs are wrong, you’re standing wrong, lean forward, etc”. I’m not just thinking about goal oriented training to get HQL/HGP, but continuing training to get better.
Again, no disrespect. I’m sure most of the members on here already know how to shoot. We need to think about training the next generation, and that starts with the next generation of trainers. Making it harder to become a trainer won’t help that.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
I’d like to point out something not yet discussed in this thread.
This is why Women on Target and other Female oriented training programs exist.I am now training my teenage daughter, and I have observed many new shooters at the range. Most teenage/20 something girls would be more comfortable learning from another young girl than an older dude with a ton of credentials.
Open your "My MGA" account.How do you see it ? Is it worth sending another email to McKay
It also comes from Instructors policing their own. Some will, some won't, and some will take an opportunity to use the lower quality trainers to improve their business and lot.Md legislation is not going to fix a bad instructor. They will make it so only people with nothing going on for a week can take a class or off duty cops with tax funded certifications have to teach the classes.
Consumer protection comes in the form of places like this calling out terrible trainers and recommending quality trainers, not legislation.
I think you quoted the wrong person. I ask Dan what he thought on how it would shake out .Open your "My MGA" account.
Or follow the MSI bill tracker that is painstakingly maintained to answer such questions.
Open your "My MGA" account.
Or follow the MSI bill tracker that is painstakingly maintained to answer such questions.
I think you quoted the wrong person. I ask Dan what he thought on how it would shake out .
After he answered a question I ask upstream.
I am not as connected or computer savvy,
Yes! The Next Gen Trainers are exactly who the Old Guard Gatekeepers are trying to protect their turf from.Again, no disrespect. I’m sure most of the members on here already know how to shoot. We need to think about training the next generation, and that starts with the next generation of trainers. Making it harder to become a trainer won’t help that.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
It's out of his hands now.How do you see it ? Is it worth sending another email to McKay
Thanks Dan for everythingIt's out of his hands now.
We wait and see where/if at all, it comes back and prepare to jump on short notice (basically Same shit, different session.)