SAF sues MD over red flag law.

[Allen65]

I wonder why Webb was so out for blood for Willey?
Some rich man north of Richmond probably wants his property down there to Fishing Creek.
And, I bet one of those dirt bag commissioners had something to do with this below Judge Melvin Jews Chamber.
Im telling ya, the whole frickin county leadership is out of control all the way down to the Sheriffs department.
SAF needs to be hipped to a few more tidbits for how they operate and they have a huge chance to get involved in ancillary matters that exhibit the same pattern of behavior.
Webb aint no Karen, she's just a full blown idiot who operates in a completely unchecked manner and has inserted herself unwittingly into a pile of sh!t on someone else's behalf.

Sounds like someone who knows the details of the local going-on needs to get in touch with SAF's attorney to give them the background.

 

[welder516]

This case sounds eerily similar to harassment @welder516 suffered. Inspector with over-inflated sense of importance using the system to abuse someone she didn’t like? Perjuring herself by claiming threats were made that weren’t? People like this shouldn’t have ANY power over the rest of us.

Government Karen’s…SMH.

Yes indeed

 

[Doco Overboard]

Sounds like someone who knows the details of the local going-on needs to get in touch with SAF's attorney to give them the background.

Yeah that would be me , soon as I clear a couple caveats this morning and have a conversation with Ms. Webb if she’s available.
I paid to have some land perk tested for an home site and it was never done.
I had one of the young-ins manage the matter and he’s telling me planning and zoning informed it would be done in 2024 , then in the rainy season and then it was that it had already been done so on and so forth.
So , evidently based on my understanding they’re thieves as well as liars.
Maybe her office will Erpo me or something who knows.
Check her out on linked-d in.
She’s a pretty woman with one follower and it’s prolly herself.
Maybe I can work a deal somehow with her.
But, she better be capable of some serious reparations for 400$.

 

[RFBfromDE]

Are there old appliances and abandoned cars in his yard or aren't there?

 

[Blacksmith101]

Are there old appliances and abandoned cars in his yard or aren't there?

Take a look on some of the satellite views that are available.

 

[RFBfromDE]

Is this it?

1208 Parks Rd, Fishing Creek, MD - 2 baths

2 baths, 2016 sq. ft. house located at 1208 Parks Rd, Fishing Creek, MD 21634. View sales history, tax history, home value estimates, and overhead views. APN 06090591.

www.redfin.com

 

[Blacksmith101]

According to Maryland's SDAT he has more than one property but I can't seem to find 1208 Parks Rd. on SDAT because it says there is no such road in Dorchester Co.
Link to SDAT

Full Width Simple

An official website of the State of Maryland.

sdat.dat.maryland.gov

You can find

WILLEY DONALD S

06 092500

1229 HORSE POINT RD

N

0100

0158

Edit
I finally found both of them. Go to SDAT select Dorchester then for search method select MAP/PARCEL and the map number is 0100 parcel 0158 and 0156. So the answer is yes that is one of them.

 

[Doco Overboard]

Yeah , it’s fishing creek not Montgomery county.
Somebody wants that property.

 

[RFBfromDE]

Maybe they just want all the shit removed from it.

It has no waterfront.

 

[Blacksmith101]

Maybe they just want all the shit removed from it.

It has no waterfront.

He has a 10 foot fence maybe to hide it from sensitive eyes.

 

[Doco Overboard]

Maybe they just want all the shit removed from it.

It has no waterfront.

Good enough reason to Erpo him I guess.

 

[Mark75H]

Awesome case

 

[RFBfromDE]

Good enough reason to Erpo him I guess.

Lying about the pretext for the ERPO is another matter altogether, yes.

 

[Blacksmith101]

I think the defendants should be personally very worried because it not only mentions section 1983 it also uses the following phrases repeatedly.
"....occurred intentionally and under color of state law....."
"....which an objectively reasonable person would have been aware....."
"..... deprive Plaintiffs of their fundamental constitutional right....."

Do I smell a personal lawsuit under 1983 in the works?

 

[Bob A]

Lying about the pretext for the ERPO is another matter altogether, yes.

I was under the impression that MD's ERPO law protected the person who initiated the complaint from any liability.

No doubt their defense would be that they "felt threatened" by the gun owner.

And feelings are real.

 

[Allen65]

I was under the impression that MD's ERPO law protected the person who initiated the complaint from any liability.

No doubt their defense would be that they "felt threatened" by the gun owner.

And feelings are real.

A state law can only protect from liability under state law. 42 USC 1983 provides a Federal cause of action for civil rights violated under color of state law.

 

[Doco Overboard]

I can tell you this
Doco county planning and zoning / public health department is compliant to citizen’s concerns as a soft teddy bear.
I should have squeezed them for a bushel crabs after speaking to them yesterday.
Bet they would have delivered to my doorstep via door dash those frickin losers.

 

[dblas]

I was under the impression that MD's ERPO law protected the person who initiated the complaint from any liability.

No doubt their defense would be that they "felt threatened" by the gun owner.

And feelings are real.

State Statute does NOT protect a person from KNOWINGLY making a false report for an ERPO.

 

[Bob A]

State Statute does NOT protect a person from KNOWINGLY making a false report for an ERPO.

No doubt the state is capable of determining what the reporter "knows." Of course, the entire concept is based on the subjective view of the person making the report, so there's no chance of "feeling" interfering with the reporter's mindset.

Doubtless the issue would be explored in depth, with no bias regarding the political stance of the person reported; equal justice under the law.

 

[RFBfromDE]

Doubtless, yes.