Copied from other thread.
Unless I missed it i don't remember seeing it on the one i filled out. I could be wrong.
Copied from other thread.
Unless I missed it i don't remember seeing it on the one i filled out. I could be wrong.
Nope, she was being a bit tongue in cheek. They don't exist yet and sounds like they won't exist on 10/1/13.....not that anyone could fill one out. Guess they are factoring in an additional 30 days to get those forms out because they know nobody will be able to buy!
So how would a FFL record a person's HQL number before release; and if the AG subpoenaed the records for people that did pick them up without HQL's all FFL's wouldnt have done it the same way.
Nope, she was being a bit tongue in cheek. They don't exist yet and sounds like they won't exist on 10/1/13.....not that anyone could fill one out. Guess they are factoring in an additional 30 days to get those forms out because they know nobody will be able to buy!
I personally know of a few people who fit the exception to the hql, and can purchase on Oct 1 or after.
Apparently on the MSP web page, if you own a regulated firearm already, you dont need to take the class to apply for the HQL.
Welcome to the site first of all.
Secondly, that is absolutely correct.
I personally know of a few people who fit the exception to the hql, and can purchase on Oct 1 or after.
I just got off the phone with Senator Klausmeier's office. They were unaware of this confusion but advised me that they have received several messages and e-mail regarding the matter. I filled them in with great detail as to the issue. They advised me that they will work on getting some kind of clarification as to what the hell is going on and will get back to me. I will pass on what I find.
Unless I missed it i don't remember seeing it on the one i filled out. I could be wrong.
I received a callback from Senator Klausmeier's office. They spoke with their contact at the MSP who advised them that it is the policy of the MSP, AS THE AGENCY TASKED WITH THE REGULATION OF FIREARMS PURCHASES IN THE STATE OF MD, that handguns with paperwork pending before October 1 will be treated as legal for release after Oct 1. They further stated that no other law enforcement agency can make a practical legal argument that the gun purchaser or FFL have violated the law (even though they clearly have done so according to the letter of the law) when they, as the official regulating agency, have advised both the purchaser and the FFL that the transfer shall be considered proper. I was further told that there probably will be no further communications regarding this from the MSP, AG office, or MOM...because they see the matter as adequately explained.
.
I am not an attny or a politician....but this seems like a sloppy way of implementing a new law.....But this is the information that I was given.
.
Please don't shoot the messenger! lol
It did not work in CA ... 2,500 guns were confiscated
This isn't California...at least not yet!
California is actually eerily similar to Maryland. Two main population hubs, San Francisco and Los Angeles, have enough votes in the legislature to essentially rule the entire state. Outside of these two population centers, the state is very concentrated in agribusiness, far mini and ranching, and fishing. The people outside these centers are not much different than the Eastern Shore or even western Maryland. Plus, these people are direct descendants of true frontiersmen with that freedom loving spirit that took their great grandfathers out there in 1849 to begin with.
There are true 2A defenders out there, they have simply been muzzled by politics no different than our own issues here.
I wonder...
Since the state says that anything with a barrel length under 16" is a handgun, ...