This is going to the Administration...not congress. No way in hell the prez would repeal any gun related law.
I am pretty sure he can't either even if he wanted to. If you have another petition to congress I can sign, please post it.
I am pretty sure he can't either even if he wanted to. If you have another petition to congress I can sign, please post it.
IF the R's gain control in the Senate this year AND IF a favorable R is elected to the White House in 2016, we MAY be able to solicit Congress for a modification of FOPA 1986 on some benign grounds. Back-door a line out of the Hughes Amendment (via Amendment) at midnight before the session closes, as happened before. Voila...
Yeah... Since the NRA backed and Reagan signed the Bill. Bush Sr and Jr gave us import bans. The last Rep was Romney who signed an AWB in his state as Governor. I am sure we are going to find a Rep that Gun Friendly. Thats some drunk dreaming going on there...
the biggest voice against the repeal will be machine gun owners.
think about it for a minute. my 100k investment would be worth a whole lot less if mgs were available again in mass. what would a pre-86 16k m-16 be valued at if new ones were available again for 2 to 3k for everyone?
This is a good point, and the right way to go, but how many here have liberal anti gun friends?Invite an anti-gun liberal friend to a free day at the gun range. If you can convince them that guns can be fun and aren't inherently unstable/dangerous and used solely to "spray classrooms of innocent children and furry animals", then you may've stolen a vote away from the Obama/Bloomberg/O'Malley crisis and taken a small step towards returning Maryland to the United States of America and the rule of law.
I can't tell if you are intimating that you are more concerned with your investment than people's constitutional rights. Could you clarify?
money.
Wonderful. Before I disparaged your position, I wanted to be sure. Honesty is appreciated.
Nice to know that there are indeed folks out there more concerned with their investment than people's rights. I would happily sacrifice my investment so that people could enjoy machine guns like they did before 1986.
I think it's fair to assert that people in your vein are one, albeit low in the relevance factor, of the reasons efforts to change the law are largely absent.
I mean, why would I care about changing Maryland's FSA? I don't want other people to have the cool stuff I do plus I have a purchase order for things I don't have.
Sell me your $250k house for $50K, what do you say?... huh?
most investers will give you the same answer.
So owning a home is a right now like buying a firearm? I guess you and Obama had a conversation recently. Owning a home and buying something that is artificially inflated in price by an unconstitutional law are comparable in your mind?
Essentially, I am concluding you are not a gun person, don't really care about the rights of others and simply buy machine guns to make money. Everyone else who can't afford those things should just get over it. Nice.