Search results

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!

    • Register Log in
    1. A

      We have an MSP Head

      And nobody has Godwin'd it yet either, right?!
    2. A

      CA denied intervention in Peruta!

      Wait...did the dissenting judge really cite a dissent from another case in his dissent, as if it were gospel? Didn't CA early on stay out of this when they could have intervened from the beginning? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    3. A

      Epidemic of false protective orders and gun rights

      I literally told my wife, who I love dearly, that I would rather get painful terminal ass cancer than ever go through a divorce. Hypothetically speaking, of course. It's great we can talk so frankly. I'm very sorry to hear of your predicament, you should make sure you have a competent...
    4. A

      Got a Frosh flyer on my door

      "You may very well think that about Mr Frosh, but I couldn't possibly comment" Great show, first 2 parts better than the final cut, though... Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    5. A

      Decision in Kachalsky LOSS

      Factor in Scalias comments in mid February. So is the underlying implication that they denied Masciandaro and Williams because they don't want to use a criminal case? The civil ones are totally clean hands.
    6. A

      *****4/3 3rd read thread*****

      Is this cartoon character's hair amazing enough?
    7. A

      *OFFICIAL* 4/2 Thread

      Is the PBJ thing in the senate bill? Is it PBJ for a violent crime?
    8. A

      *OFFICIAL* 4/2 Thread

      Isn't there a provision in this to make carrying outside permit restrictions a crime? Sounds like it will be more important than ever to have one's official "business cash" envelope on one's person constantly. With a few hundred in it. Heck, make it into a permit-holding wallet.
    9. A

      Connecticut Falls Prey to Antis

      Does this ridiculous bill change the fact that CT is, functionally, a shall-issue state? Albeit one without preemption laws.
    10. A

      *OFFICIAL* 3/29 Thread

      Good luck enforcing that one.
    11. A

      **FLASH TRAFFIC** WOOLARD REVERSED

      And a denial of cert in Kachalsky also would give us an answer, no? It would imply SCOTUS is just fine with may-issue. But both of these are totally clean civil cases of 2A, not like Masciandaro, Chester, etc. They could deny Kachalsky and let the 9th cases percolate. Knowing...
    12. A

      Oral Sex = Lose Your Firearms

      Or something else in cheek. Jeez, this topic just writes its own bad jokes!:thumbsup:
    13. A

      Oral Sex = Lose Your Firearms

      Is that IANAL..... Or I ANAL ? :innocent0
    14. A

      Airsoft on your own property?

      I had friends who had airsofted several times on my farm at the very western tip of Howard Co. Then again, it was in the woods in the middle of 200 acres. Some of their gear looked pretty "real" but for orange tips. I often wondered if some lunatic could paint a real SBR with an orange...
    15. A

      Disqualifying Crime

      IANAL. But...charged does not mean convicted. More accurate detail surely would be required.
    16. A

      US v. Black 4th Circuit

      Is this a reference to that MD senator at the hearing?!:lol2:
    17. A

      New York & Hollywood

      If Blew-m-berg were serious about his guns thing, he wouldn't allow the filming of movies that glorify gun violence in NYC. "illegal guns" really means "guns owned by people he can't control" (He could have spent $2 instead of $2M on that IL primary and the same outcome would have...
    18. A

      SAF files Suit in Illinois over Right to Carry

      If the interpretation of SCOTUS follows both the 7th and recent 10th rulings -- states can ban concealed carry, but cannot ban all manner of carry. States could of course preempt localities' laws also. So Chicago could force open carry. That will last about 5 minutes being unpalatable to...
    19. A

      Peterson v LaCabe Case (CO Residency Requirment)

      This is where the right itself should not be confused with the choice of implementing it. The plaintiff, I think, did not contest the ban on open carry. Even in Heller, SCOTUS said that banning concealed carry was fine. Bearing does not mean it need be concealed. The winning argument would...
    20. A

      SAF files Suit in Illinois over Right to Carry

      While a simplistic view is that SCOTUS thinks may-issue is fine, and no-issue is not permitted....they are surely aware that in states like NJ and HI, may-issue schemes are effectively interpreted as no-issue. At least in states like MD, you can spin up a little business, move cash around, and...
    Top Bottom