Reports of Mass Disapprovals of eForm 1 Silencers

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • camo556

    Ultimate Member
    Aug 29, 2021
    2,634
    A lot of people on the form 1 faceplant group say they got denied without even buying parts.

    I suspect some sort of glitch.
     

    camo556

    Ultimate Member
    Aug 29, 2021
    2,634
    And even if its not an actual glitch, I predict that they reverse whatever did this and call it a glitch.
     

    traveller

    The one with two L
    Nov 26, 2010
    18,478
    variable
    I'm skeptical, but it's not impossible.


    I'm sure the overlap is about 99%, if not higher.

    Would be interesting to see how the volume of form 1 submissions for silencers has developed over time. I bet there is an inflection point where something that was very uncommon turned into a flood of similar applications. It would also be interesting to see a sample of those form 1 whether there is something that ties them together in the agencies mind. Its like when the zoning board receives 100 objections to a development and they all have different names on them but have the same wording and were dropped in the mail the same day at a small post office at the location of a competing developer.
     

    erwos

    The Hebrew Hammer
    MDS Supporter
    Mar 25, 2009
    13,897
    Rockville, MD
    Would be interesting to see how the volume of form 1 submissions for silencers has developed over time. I bet there is an inflection point where something that was very uncommon turned into a flood of similar applications. It would also be interesting to see a sample of those form 1 whether there is something that ties them together in the agencies mind. Its like when the zoning board receives 100 objections to a development and they all have different names on them but have the same wording and were dropped in the mail the same day at a small post office at the location of a competing developer.
    NFA tracker used to ask what you were transferring/building, but I think they stopped doing that. That would have been a good resource for this question. No doubt in my mind that volume has gone way up over the past few years.
     

    IMBLITZVT

    Ultimate Member
    Apr 20, 2009
    3,799
    Catonsville, MD
    But the point is the ATF does not know if you are using a solvent trap or bar stock to build the suppressor. Nowhere on the application asks what material or parts you are using, just the size and caliber.

    Yeah I was thinking the same thing. How do they know. Its like a catch 22. You can not legally have suppressor parts, only a complete suppressor. So you can only make a suppressor out of a single part or you have multiple parts and only one approved form, so its illegal because then you have suppressor parts. Some crazy stuff in the world right now.

    Yes….dump out all the form 1s. Start lightening fast form 4 approvals. The diy industry dies off…

    Haha, I thought about this too. I have a form 4 and a form 5 in right now! However I then remembered, my form 5 went in with a form 1 to reactivate a MG! So lets hope that does not get the rejection letter too!
     

    lazarus

    Ultimate Member
    Jun 23, 2015
    13,759
    Yeah I was thinking the same thing. How do they know. Its like a catch 22. You can not legally have suppressor parts, only a complete suppressor. So you can only make a suppressor out of a single part or you have multiple parts and only one approved form, so its illegal because then you have suppressor parts. Some crazy stuff in the world right now.



    Haha, I thought about this too. I have a form 4 and a form 5 in right now! However I then remembered, my form 5 went in with a form 1 to reactivate a MG! So lets hope that does not get the rejection letter too!

    I think the issue is ATF is looking at solvent traps like 80s. You and I and they know the things are intended to be made in to silencers (hopefully after you have a form 1 done and stamp in hand!)

    But as for what the NFA says, that makes them suppressor parts. Even if it isn’t functional yet. And that makes the solvent trap maker the manufacturer. And for a suppressor, you can’t be the maker of a can from already NFA parts. You’d need an FFL/SOT to do that.

    So you can’t form 1 a silencer with a solvent trap.

    You’d need to build one from scratch or from parts not intended to be part of a silencer. Get a form 1 and get a maglight and some actual automotive freeze plugs and a former I guess. Or actually mill things from bar stock or similar.

    That’s my assumption of what the ATF is deciding. And per the NFA, they probably have a pretty good legal case. Even if it is stupid.
     

    traveller

    The one with two L
    Nov 26, 2010
    18,478
    variable
    I think the issue is ATF is looking at solvent traps like 80s. You and I and they know the things are intended to be made in to silencers (hopefully after you have a form 1 done and stamp in hand!)

    But as for what the NFA says, that makes them suppressor parts. Even if it isn’t functional yet. And that makes the solvent trap maker the manufacturer. And for a suppressor, you can’t be the maker of a can from already NFA parts. You’d need an FFL/SOT to do that.

    So you can’t form 1 a silencer with a solvent trap.

    You’d need to build one from scratch or from parts not intended to be part of a silencer. Get a form 1 and get a maglight and some actual automotive freeze plugs and a former I guess. Or actually mill things from bar stock or similar.

    That’s my assumption of what the ATF is deciding. And per the NFA, they probably have a pretty good legal case. Even if it is stupid.

    Right, that would make sense if you submitted a parts lists and drawings with your form1, but you don't do that. They just presume that you are using illegal parts, and unless they have concrete evidence for that , I don't see how their apparent blanket determination will hold up under judicial review.
     

    rseymorejr

    Ultimate Member
    MDS Supporter
    Feb 28, 2011
    26,389
    Harford County
    All this over a product that never should have been regulated at all.
    What exactly do these morons think they are accomplishing?
     

    magnumpi

    Active Member
    Jan 16, 2013
    377
    Westminster MD
    Right, that would make sense if you submitted a parts lists and drawings with your form1, but you don't do that. They just presume that you are using illegal parts, and unless they have concrete evidence for that , I don't see how their apparent blanket determination will hold up under judicial review.

    I have seen several screen shots posted of alleged emails with ATF about this. Apparently they are planning to start requiring parts lists, pics, and diagrams for form 1 applications to insure you are not making them from kits. If so why not announce that first before just randomly denying applications.
    I also don't understand why it really matters how it's built, it is still registered with a tax stamp, same as if you purchased one already complete. I can almost understand why they are going after the kit manufacturers, I don't agree with it but can see some logic to it at least. I know, I know, logic doesn't exist within the ATF. I wonder how much time effort and money is going into enforcing this new 'rule" and how it gonna stop crime or make anyone safer? That is the purpose of the ATF isn't it?
     

    ToolAA

    Ultimate Member
    MDS Supporter
    Jun 17, 2016
    10,615
    God's Country
    This is all a ploy by the Big Silencer Companies, just like Big Pharma they are in bed with the ATF lining their pockets at the expense of personal liberty.

    /s



    Now in all seriousness, what this does is create an opportunity for a company like GhostGunner to develop a simple automated home lathe in a box so that bar stock can be easily turned into tubes, threaded adaptors and baffle cups. I suspect a savvy tech/machinist can already use a modified Grizzly with NC control to do this right now for less than $4k.
     

    teratos

    My hair is amazing
    MDS Supporter
    Patriot Picket
    Jan 22, 2009
    59,960
    Bel Air
    This is all a ploy by the Big Silencer Companies, just like Big Pharma they are in bed with the ATF lining their pockets at the expense of personal liberty.

    /s



    Now in all seriousness, what this does is create an opportunity for a company like GhostGunner to develop a simple automated home lathe in a box so that bar stock can be easily turned into tubes, threaded adaptors and baffle cups. I suspect a savvy tech/machinist can already use a modified Grizzly with NC control to do this right now for less than $4k.

    I have about $1500 into my Grizzly lathe. That with updated bearings, tooling and my time to polish the ways etc. I have DRO. The operations one needs to make baffles are quite basic.
     

    ToolAA

    Ultimate Member
    MDS Supporter
    Jun 17, 2016
    10,615
    God's Country
    I have about $1500 into my Grizzly lathe. That with updated bearings, tooling and my time to polish the ways etc. I have DRO. The operations one needs to make baffles are quite basic.


    How about I buy the parts to upgrade it up to full CNC. You’ll need learn Fusion360 and Mach3, and I can teach you. Then you’ll be able go from just mere doctor status, to full fledged mad scientist status.
     

    teratos

    My hair is amazing
    MDS Supporter
    Patriot Picket
    Jan 22, 2009
    59,960
    Bel Air
    How about I buy the parts to upgrade it up to full CNC. You’ll need learn Fusion360 and Mach3, and I can teach you. Then you’ll be able go from just mere doctor status, to full fledged mad scientist status.

    :lol:

    I do have that aspiration...you are willing to be my sugar daddy? :D
     

    rbird7282

    Ultimate Member
    MDS Supporter
    Dec 6, 2012
    18,795
    Columbia
    I have about $1500 into my Grizzly lathe. That with updated bearings, tooling and my time to polish the ways etc. I have DRO. The operations one needs to make baffles are quite basic.


    Great, now I need to buy a metal lathe


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
     

    babalou

    Ultimate Member
    MDS Supporter
    Aug 12, 2013
    16,245
    Glenelg
    nice

    I have about $1500 into my Grizzly lathe. That with updated bearings, tooling and my time to polish the ways etc. I have DRO. The operations one needs to make baffles are quite basic.

    I'm in!! great karma
     

    traveller

    The one with two L
    Nov 26, 2010
    18,478
    variable
    I have seen several screen shots posted of alleged emails with ATF about this. Apparently they are planning to start requiring parts lists, pics, and diagrams for form 1 applications to insure you are not making them from kits. If so why not announce that first before just randomly denying applications.

    Now it starts to make more sense. I wonder how much this policy is grounded in actual regulation and whether this substantive change in how they process form 1 would have required a NPRM etc.

    I also don't understand why it really matters how it's built, it is still registered with a tax stamp, same as if you purchased one already complete. I can almost understand why they are going after the kit manufacturers, I don't agree with it but can see some logic to it at least.

    The goal of the administrative state is to administrate everything. I hear there is a state that at one point taxed and regulated the rain that falls on your property.

    Super killy silencers that allow assassins to kill people without anyone hearing it* are being made without the government giving it's blessing. That's why.





    * as we have seen it in the movies so many times, just a quiet 'plopp' sound and the victim immediately collapses.
     

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    276,015
    Messages
    7,304,743
    Members
    33,560
    Latest member
    JackW

    Latest threads

    Top Bottom