Keyword: "Win"Didn't you just win two of them?
Keyword: "Win"Didn't you just win two of them?
My legs are gorgeous but heels would be as dangerous for my feet as holstering a Glock.You have ugly legs?
My legs are gorgeous but heels would be as dangerous for my feet as holstering a Glock.
Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk
Sorry, I'll be keeping them as a teaching aid for when my grandchildren asks "Pop Pop, what gun should I save up to buy?" I can point them and say "Anything that doesn't have this stupid square G".No GQL for you then. Give those junky firearms to me.
Sorry, I'll be keeping them as a teaching aid for when my grandchildren asks "Pop Pop, what gun should I save up to buy?" I can point them and say "Anything that doesn't have this stupid square G".
Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk
This thread went nothing like the OP and his alter ego hoped. LMAO
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
Until a piece of lint gets stuck in it and your firing pin doesn't fall.
Just keep your finger off the trigger; another unnecessary invention like the "NY Trigger Springs"
You are correct. It appears the OP had hoped to have a civil discussion on the merits of a new product. The hive mind of MDS did not allow that discussion.
You really should know a bit about the people you slander (alter ego?) Try putting ToddG and Glock into the Google.
M&P, Sig, H&K, Glock, and Springfield (1911) have all paid for him to do high round count endurance tests on some of their firearms.
Maybe read this: https://www.swatmag.com/articles/the_fast_and_the_furious
Civil discussion? Or was it a flat out promotion of a product? Agreed it is
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
You call it hive mind, I call it street smart. You need to learn to smell out when you are being played.
From where I sit, if the staff wants to let someone hawk their stuff on here, then that's their call to make, and thus the extent that I give a damn.
Whoever wants to use it, do so with my blessing. I choose not to because I prefer to train myself in trigger discipline as opposed to adding more moving parts to an otherwise perfectly good pistol.
I agree.
The I.P.s pay to advertise here or their employees advertise for them.
Lately we have people joining up with their company names pushing their wares, and stuff like this does not sit right with me. Then again it's not may call.
I find this thread surprising. I've been following the development of the Gadget since early 2011, and I'll be buying two of them. I honestly thought there would be a much more positive response to this.