Not in court. In court it's called "Objection, speculation, facts not in evidence", and it's less than worthless.
We're not in a research laboratory here, we're in a trial to determine whether a man should be sentenced to 20 years in prison for murder 2.
I would suggest that if you were the defendant in this situation you'd prefer the State argue the facts, and not speculative "hypothesis". That is, after all, your Constitutionally-mandated due process right.
Andrew
@LawSelfDefense
I agree
If for some legal shakanery or hail mary, the prosecution can "truthfully" substantiate their claim(s), then what you call a "lie" would not be a lie.
What I am trying to say: It's more of a middle of the road presentation, to not project a bias to either side. Saves for eating some crow later on.