Widow sues homeonwer after he's no-billed

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Andras

    Active Member
    Aug 12, 2008
    583
    Charles Co.
    Didn't Frosh assure us this would never happen?

    http://www.buffalonews.com/city/article313145.ece

    The widow of David W. Park, an Albany teacher who was shot and killed as an intruder in an Amherst home, has filed a wrongful death lawsuit against the homeowner who pulled the trigger.

    The lawsuit accuses David D'Amico of the "willful, intentional, malicious" slaying of Park, and acting "without just cause [or] provocation."

    Deanna Ripstein, Park's widow, filed the State Supreme Court lawsuit eight months after an Erie County grand jury -- following an extensive Amherst Police investigation -- decided not to file criminal charges against D'Amico.

    more at link.

    Fortunately, the comments are running 95% in support of D'Amico.
     

    Norton

    NRA Endowment Member, Rifleman
    Staff member
    Admin
    Moderator
    May 22, 2005
    122,906
    His response would be, "Did he successfully sue and win?".

    Senator Frosh, being an attorney whose firm practices these sort of suits, believes that it's a fundamental right to sue anyone even if the suit is unwarranted and the respondent in the suit is financially ruined defending against the suit.
     

    joppaj

    Sheepdog
    Staff member
    Moderator
    Apr 11, 2008
    46,824
    MD
    Frosh told us that anyone could sue anyone anytime for anything. I think that if this case is tossed, it would prove his assertation that they'd never go forward. You and I know that the burden, the irritation, the overall asshattery of the suit matters but to a lawyer it's not important. Thankfully we won that fight last year.
     

    Drmsparks

    Old School Rifleman
    Jun 26, 2007
    8,441
    PG county
    This is my old home town.....

    It's Erie county New York.

    It used to be essentially no issue. Very difficult to get permits....New York has local judges handle permitting- and that's permitting to own, not just carry. Judge in charge felt no one needed handguns period.

    In the early 90's a middle aged Amherst diamond merchant was in a fender bender. The driver of the other vehicle came after him with a tire iron.

    The merchant, who was transporting stones at the time, tried to retreat within his car. The other driver threw open the door to the truck and the merchant shot him.

    I believe they sentence him to 15 years for murder.


    Not a friendly place for gun owners.....
     

    mackie

    Dumb Farmer
    Jan 7, 2009
    1,247
    Cecil County
    I read a few of the comments, and love how the one person stated that the homeowner could have shot Park in the leg, or not at all. It's nice to be able to sit back and disect what happened with out having to worry about the concicenses. Fortunatly for the homeowner he was on the phone with 911 when he shot his intruder.
     

    Maryland_Shooter

    Banned
    BANNED!!!
    Feb 8, 2008
    917
    Glen Arm
    His response would be, "Did he successfully sue and win?".

    Senator Frosh, being an attorney whose firm practices these sort of suits, believes that it's a fundamental right to sue anyone even if the suit is unwarranted and the respondent in the suit is financially ruined defending against the suit.

    When they start whacking the lawyers with costs, not to be passed on to the client, this stuff will stop.

    You also have a counter claim - or I should say claims for this sort of nonsense.

    If it's a corporation, the S.L.A.P.P statutes are quite useful.

    S.L.A.P.P = Strategic Litigation Against Public Participation

    Litigation is ALWAYS a last resort and most can't go pro-se; however if you can do just a smattering of law, you can usually get them to go away.

    Ask me how I know :innocent0

    Actually don't ask - just take my word for it.
     

    press1280

    Ultimate Member
    Jun 11, 2010
    7,929
    WV
    The asshat attorney for the dead guy is claiming he wasn't at fault. Even if it wasn't his intention to go into that particular house, he was the one who got drunk and did just that. The guy's a low life ambulance chaser.
     

    mikec

    Ultimate Member
    Dec 1, 2007
    11,453
    Off I-83
    The asshat attorney for the dead guy is claiming he wasn't at fault. Even if it wasn't his intention to go into that particular house, he was the one who got drunk and did just that. The guy's a low life ambulance chaser.

    I have to check with my sister. My brother in law is a lawyer in that area.

    Frank A. Sedita, that is a name from the past. His grandfather was mayor of Buffalo when I was a kid.

    The Amherst PD is top notch. They are very professional.
     

    Drmsparks

    Old School Rifleman
    Jun 26, 2007
    8,441
    PG county
    The Amherst PD is top notch. They are very professional.

    The must have got betta. In all seriousness, a lot of Buffalo has moved in and they have been facing real crime for the last 10 years or so.

    .....Before that they were mainly the enforcement arm of the home owners associations and spent most of their time chasing beer drinking kids through the woods.....:innocent0

    back to my earlier post, I want to stress the merchant was convicted by a jury of his "peers", not just a judge. There used to be a lot of anti gun feeling out there.....
     

    Oldcarjunkie

    R.I.P
    Jan 8, 2009
    12,217
    A.A county
    Shame the guy had to die cause he was a dumb drunk, but i can def see why the homeowner felt that it was the only option left as the guy was trying to make his way up the stairs towards them after numerous warnings to stop.
     

    28Shooter

    Ultimate Member
    MDS Supporter
    Sep 19, 2010
    8,233
    Baltimore, Maryland
    "When they start whacking the lawyers with costs, not to be passed on to the client, this stuff will stop."

    Absolutely right! I once saw a judge award $1.00 to guy whose lawyer brought a frivolous accident claim to trial. The judge lectured the attorney for bringing such a suit forward, wasting the court's valuable time, and then awarded his client one dollar with a statement that he hoped his attorney was working on a contingency basis.
     

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Latest posts

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    276,008
    Messages
    7,304,443
    Members
    33,559
    Latest member
    Lloyd_Hansen

    Latest threads

    Top Bottom