habanerchaser
Member
You can just build an AR for the price of HQL, instead of using a handgun to fight to my rifle I will use a rifle to fight to my rifle.
Nice to see so many O'Malley supporters here still carrying the flag for him by refusing to get a HQL.
Democrats/Anti-Gunners in MD for the win!!
Nice to see so many O'Malley supporters here still carrying the flag for him by refusing to get a HQL.
Democrats/Anti-Gunners in MD for the win!!
Nice to see so many O'Malley supporters here still carrying the flag for him by refusing to get a HQL.
Democrats/Anti-Gunners in MD for the win!!
Nice to see so many O'Malley supporters here still carrying the flag for him by refusing to get a HQL.
Democrats/Anti-Gunners in MD for the win!!
Seriously? Did you enjoy jumping through hoops and begging the government for permission to exercise your RIGHT to bear arms? Smart, resourceful people don't need an HQL to purchase anything...use your damn brain and exploit holes in the illegal law..
No, I don't enjoy jumping through hoops, but if we let the Antis throw up enough barriers to gun ownership that folks stop buying, they win.
The law was designed to curtail gun sales, not for "gun safety," and, yes, it is another fee, which averages out to around $10 a year with fingerprints and license fee.
If you can't afford that, you probably can't afford a gun either.
C&R and legal face to face sales are great, but they won't keep gun dealers alive in this state, and surprise, surprise, gun dealers ARE in the business to make money. The Democrats and other Antis counted on the HQL putting dealers out of business, and it already has.
Use your damn brain and see the real agenda here.
Nice to see so many O'Malley supporters here still carrying the flag for him by refusing to get a HQL.
Democrats/Anti-Gunners in MD for the win!!
So if a Ford salesmen went onto a car forum and scolded users for not getting a drivers license so they could buy cars to drive on the roads, you wouldn't see the irony?
I understand that the dealers are in a tough spot right now, but you can't bad mouth, bully, or ridicule people into doing what you want...at least not this group.
Completely irrelevant comparison, as I don't see the government trying to make cars illegal and harder to obtain anytime soon.
If you will read the post I was respond to, you will see I only used rhetoric that was taken directly from his post, so no bullying, badmouthing or ridicule here.
I am not in a particularly tight spot, but many dealers are,
I stand by my opinion on the matter, here , or anyplace else.
The law was designed to discourage gun sales and it is working.
suppose the gov said you needed a permit to even think about buying a car
No, I don't enjoy jumping through hoops, but if we let the Antis throw up enough barriers to gun ownership that folks stop buying, they win.
The law was designed to curtail gun sales, not for "gun safety," and, yes, it is another fee, which averages out to around $10 a year with fingerprints and license fee.
If you can't afford that, you probably can't afford a gun either.
C&R and legal face to face sales are great, but they won't keep gun dealers alive in this state, and surprise, surprise, gun dealers ARE in the business to make money. The Democrats and other Antis counted on the HQL putting dealers out of business, and it already has.
Use your damn brain and see the real agenda here.
The comparison highlighted the irony of someone selling something and belittling folks who choose not to buy...that's it.
You're entitled to your opinion a me mine.
Glad you're not in a tight spot...no sarc...I mean that.
Yes, it was designed to discourage gun sales. Hopefully there's a lawsuit in the works for the newly turned 21-year-olds whose rights are being violated by this law. I think that group might have the best argument against this law.
Let me guess...you're a gun dealer...well here is some news for you...people don't buy guns to keep dealers in business...people buy guns for sporting or as the case may be recently, to kill bad guys...they don't (or shouldn't) care who they buy their gun from...in fact, people who don't want the government to know their business should never buy a gun from a dealer...The HQL is more than just am impediment to purchasing a hand gun, it's also defacto generic registration....I don't know about your 2nd amendment but mine says "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED" and I live by that...
Let me guess...you're a gun dealer...well here is some news for you...people don't buy guns to keep dealers in business...people buy guns for sporting or as the case may be recently, to kill bad guys...they don't (or shouldn't) care who they buy their gun from...in fact, people who don't want the government to know their business should never buy a gun from a dealer...The HQL is more than just am impediment to purchasing a hand gun, it's also defacto generic registration....I don't know about your 2nd amendment but mine says "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED" and I live by that...
Let me guess...you're a gun dealer...well here is some news for you...people don't buy guns to keep dealers in business...people buy guns for sporting or as the case may be recently, to kill bad guys...they don't (or shouldn't) care who they buy their gun from...in fact, people who don't want the government to know their business should never buy a gun from a dealer...The HQL is more than just am impediment to purchasing a hand gun, it's also defacto generic registration....I don't know about your 2nd amendment but mine says "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED" and I live by that...