A diagnosis of PTSD does not mean one is a danger to society.yes people who are proven to have hallucination issues, or PTSD form the war should be kept away from weapons. They might see a stranger on the road with cell phone and see it as a taliban calling in for bomb activations
In fact, mental illness itself is not associated with a higher incidence of violence than the general population….except when substance abuse is present.A diagnosis of PTSD does not mean one is a danger to society.
If someone is having hallucinations..they should be treated.
Did you know schizophrenia no longer exists as a disorder based on the manual these "unbiased" professionals reference. Also transgender is no longer a mental disorder. So tell me how are these "unbiased" professionals going to help.unless we're ruled by a dictorator mental illness is determined by a 3rd party unbias psychiatrist.
Nope sorry IF banning someone from firearms due to mental illness is a solution it must need to be more sophisticated then just a blanket PSTD diagnosis. The problem lies in the lack of good and extensive medical care. We are now as a country experiencing the results of shutting down mental institutions in the early eighties during the Reagan administration forward.yes people who are proven to have hallucination issues, or PTSD form the war should be kept away from weapons. They might see a stranger on the road with cell phone and see it as a taliban calling in for bomb activations
Schizophrenia subtypes (paranoid, disorganized, catatonic, undifferentiated, and residual types) were removed because they are useless in guiding management. Schizophrenia isn’t going anywhere.Did you know schizophrenia no longer exists as a disorder based on the manual these "unbiased" professionals reference. Also transgender is no longer a mental disorder. So tell me how are these "unbiased" professionals going to help.
It would probably help, if she could read.Why would anyone take her seriously?
She's a stooge picked to be VP so she can read a script for whatever the global elitists put in front of her. They know they can't force us to submit as long as we still have guns.
Hmm...and here I understood her to be the head of her class--It would probably help, if she could read.
...the best head in her class.Hmm...and here I understood her to the head of her class--
Ahhh......the best head in her class.
So you believe if someone passed a basic 10 minute backgroud check for an AR15 but later find out he's suffering for severe PTSD from the war to a point he's hearing things and hallucination, or he's suffering from mental disorder like schizophrenia (with cases of violence), psychosis, bipolar, etc he should keep his guns? Yes l believe if you later developed violent mental disorder and does not have the finanial means to seak treatment, your weapons should be confiscated. Even yes you are law abiding citizen. Even people who are trying their best to manage it without medical treatment/medical intervention, you might fall into an episode where you cannot even control yourself. Some one with schiophrenia, or PTDS, might confused kids walking around in the neighborhood, with terrorist kids walkinga round with AK pointing at you.Nope sorry IF banning someone from firearms due to mental illness is a solution it must need to be more sophisticated then just a blanket PSTD diagnosis. The problem lies in the lack of good and extensive medical care. We are now as a country experiencing the results of shutting down mental institutions in the early eighties during the Reagan administration forward.
Merica is no different then any other country as far as mentally ill people in their demographics except for the LACK of available resources that WE have for them. Yes we have the 2nd Amendment that others do not but that is more the reason we should have extensive mental health care regardless of availability to pay for as long as it’s needed without restrictions on length and level of care. It will be COSTLY but it really is the only compromise we have. Unless of course you believe in CONFISCATION which I do not.
So you believe if someone passed a basic 10 minute backgroud check for an AR15 but later find out he's suffering for severe PTSD from the war to a point he's hearing things and hallucination, or he's suffering from mental disorder like schizophrenia (with cases of violence), psychosis, bipolar, etc he should keep his guns? Yes l believe if you later developed violent mental disorder and does not have the finanial means to seak treatment, your weapons should be confiscated. Even yes you are law abiding citizen. Even people who are trying their best to manage it without medical treatment/medical intervention, you might fall into an episode where you cannot even control yourself. Some one with schiophrenia, or PTDS, might confused kids walking around in the neighborhood, with terrorist kids walkinga round with AK pointing at you.
off course some of mental disorders should not be a factor like anxiety disorder, eating disorder, more non voilent ones.
Blaster229 drives a Subaru. On the phone with the police getting an ERPO right now…You might be a lib if you drive a subaru. Many libs are mentally unstable. There might be a link.
SMHBlaster229 drives a Subaru. On the phone with the police getting an ERPO right now…
Obamacare gave gov't access to all medical records with the electronic medical records mandate. Though universal access has not happened yet.You want medical records tied to the background checks?
I personally do not...gov is weaponized enough.
And what happens when the government decides that voting republican is a mental illness