VCDL sues Geotrgia and Katie wiggles

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • swinokur

    In a State of Bliss
    Patriot Picket
    Apr 15, 2009
    55,501
    Westminster USA
    VCDL sues Georgia and Katie wiggles

    1. Georgia Carry and VCDL sue Georgia Attorney General over not recognizing Virginia CHPs!
    ************************************************** **********

    This year VCDL worked with Senator Bryce Reeves, Delegate Mike Webert, and other legislators to change Virginia law to honor the CHPs of all other states. That law became effective on July 1. In turn, Virginia CHPs became recognized in Colorado, Maine, and New Hampshire. By law Georgia should have also begun honoring Virginia CHPs, but their Attorney General declined to have Georgia do so.

    Having failed to fix the problem behind the scenes, VCDL has joined forces with Georgia Carry (a top-notch gun-rights group which modeled itself after VCDL) and is suing the Georgia Attorney General in both his capacity as Attorney General and individually!

    VCDL EM Robert Sadtler is also a plaintiff in the lawsuit.

    I will advise as the lawsuit moves forward.

    Many thanks to the good folks at Georgia Carry (georgiacarry.org) and particularly to my counterpart, Jerry Henry, for the time and energy he has spent on this matter.

    To see the complaint filed earlier today, click here:

    http://georgiacarry.com/state/virgin.../complaint.pdf
    .

    ************************************************** **********
    2. Katie Couric tries to get out of VCDL's lawsuit!
    ************************************************** **********

    Katie Couric and the other defendants in VCDL's defamation lawsuit have filed motions for the judge to dismiss the case. That is standard operating procedure:

    1. Person A sues Person B
    2. Person B files a motion saying Person A has no case
    3. Person A files an opposition motion saying why Person B is wrong
    4. The judge decides if the case is to go forward to discovery and trial or if the case is to be dismissed

    We have just completed step 2.

    News coverage:

    http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment...n-lawsuit.html
    .
     

    Attachments

    • complaint.pdf
      147 KB · Views: 147
    Last edited:

    swinokur

    In a State of Bliss
    Patriot Picket
    Apr 15, 2009
    55,501
    Westminster USA
    And quite dumb IMO. GA honors other states who prohibit under 21 carry

    So they really have no defense for their position on this one
     

    EL1227

    R.I.P.
    Patriot Picket
    Nov 14, 2010
    20,274
    That's gonna leave a mark ...

    VCDL has joined forces with Georgia Carry (a top-notch gun-rights group which modeled itself after VCDL) and is suing the Georgia Attorney General in both his capacity as Attorney General and individually!

    CHRISTOPHER M. CARR, individually )
    and in his official capacity as )
    Attorney General )
    Of the State of Georgia, )
    Defendant

    Count 1 – O.C.G.A. § 16-11-126(e)
    32. By refusing to recognize VCHPs and not putting Virginia on the list of states with which
    Georgia reciprocates, Defendant is violating O.C.G.A. § 16-11-126(e).
    33. Plaintiffs seek a writ of mandamus ordering Defendant to recognize VCHPs and to put
    Virginia on the list of states with which Georgia reciprocates. This relief is sought against
    Defendant personally.


    Count 2 – O.C.G.A. § 16-11-173
    34. By failing to recognize and give effect to VCHPs, Defendant is violating O.C.G.A. § 16-
    11-173(b)(1)(B), in that his refusal has the effect of regulating the carrying of firearms by
    people who are entitled to recognition by Georgia of their VCHPs.
    35. Plaintiffs seek a declaration that persons who validly possess VCHPs are entitled to
    recognition of their VCHPs by Georgia. They also seek the expenses of this litigation and
    reasonable attorney’s fees, pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 16-11-173(g). The relief sought in this
    Count is against Defendant individually
    and in his capacity as Attorney General of the
    State of Georgia.

    WTF did Carr say or do personally and individually, or is this common legal practice, and if this suit is found for the plaintiff, what will be his penalty for relief ?
     

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Latest posts

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    275,703
    Messages
    7,292,088
    Members
    33,501
    Latest member
    Kdaily1127

    Latest threads

    Top Bottom