The Biggest Of Black Powder Guns Are BBack.....Iowa and Wisconsin.....Reportedly.

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Coehorn

    Active Member
    MDS Supporter
    Feb 26, 2024
    877
    Baltimore County
    Thought it'd be fun to stick this in the BBlack Powder section.

    BBeing reported that USS Iowa and USS Wisconsin are being returned to service. Reinstated in the Naval Vessel Registry.

    BBlack powder guns at their finest.
     

    Attachments

    • Iowa.jpg
      Iowa.jpg
      270.7 KB · Views: 41
    Last edited:

    Coehorn

    Active Member
    MDS Supporter
    Feb 26, 2024
    877
    Baltimore County
    I knew there was black powder in there somewhere.

    Thanks for the clarification.

    Rumors are flying that the shortage of BP in America is because it's being used in ordinance that's going overseas.
     

    Blacksmith101

    Grumpy Old Man
    Jun 22, 2012
    22,301

    16"/50 (40.6 cm) Mark 7​

    More powerful than the 16"/45 (40.6 cm) Mark 6 guns used on the North Carolina (BB-55) and South Dakota (BB-57) classes, this was possibly the best battleship gun ever put into service.


    From footnote 14a:

    "During the 1980 deployments, D846, originally manufactured for the 16"/45 (40.6 cm) Mark 6 guns, was rebagged and issued for use with the 1,900 lbs. (861.8 kg) HC projectiles. The charge weight was originally 571 lbs. (259 kg) for a MV of 2,690 fps (820 mps). This was apparently later increased to 593 lbs. (269.0 kg) D846 charge for the same 2,690 fps (820 mps) muzzle velocity. This may have been the result of the age of the propellant. See Muzzle Velocity Note below. Each Full Charge D846 powder bag had a 0.77 lbs. (0.35 kg) black powder bag igniter (primer patch). Testing was also performed with rebagged 8" (20.3 cm) propellant for HC reduced charges. This gave good accuracy and predictable performance, but it was not put into service use."

    Also see foot note 13a.
     
    Last edited:

    TheOriginalMexicanBob

    Ultimate Member
    Jul 2, 2017
    33,122
    Sun City West, AZ
    My dad worked in the Washington Navy Yard “Big Gun Shop” during WWII. He was a a machinist working on breech mechanisms. There’s a good possibility that the big guns on the Iowa class battleships (and others) had his fingerprints on them. His best friend from there was a coppersmith who probably had a part in other systems on the guns.
     

    BurkeM

    Ultimate Member
    MDS Supporter
    Jan 8, 2014
    1,680
    Baltimore
    Thought it'd be fun to stick this in the BBlack Powder section.

    BBeing reported that USS Iowa and USS Wisconsin are being returned to service. Reinstated in the Naval Vessel Registry.

    BBlack powder guns at their finest.
    They were never removed. They remain property of the Navy, on LOAN as museum ships.
     

    joppaj

    Sheepdog
    Staff member
    Moderator
    Apr 11, 2008
    46,724
    MD
    I remember being fascinated by the Iowa class ships when I was a teen. When they reactivated New Jersey for Desert Storm I thought it was the embodiment of warfare. Of course it wasn't long after that when more knowledgeable folks explained to me why they were obsolete and why a new battleship hadn't been built since WW2... They're still beauties.
     

    AlBeight

    Member
    MDS Supporter
    Mar 30, 2017
    4,525
    Hampstead
    I knew there was black powder in there somewhere.

    Thanks for the clarification.

    Rumors are flying that the shortage of BP in America is because it's being used in ordinance that's going overseas.
    But is there bblack powder in there?

    Probably not.
     

    Biggfoot44

    Ultimate Member
    Aug 2, 2009
    33,297
    I looked , and found even more up to date , and detailed info that that in post #9 .

    I'm too Luddite to link it , but there's an unclassified Technical Paper from 1994 in pdf form from Defense Technical Institute .

    Vastly oversimplified :

    Original Original powder for 16 inch/ 50 Caliber Guns was D839 , that is usually mentioned, in most sources .

    Even in WWII, there was experimentation in powder charges , in the context between the original original 2,300 lb projectiles , and the slightly later WWII Era 2,900 lb projectiles .

    By Korean Era , was using D846 . And the Korean Era powder stocks were still in use through the Lebanon deployment Era.

    By 1990's , the Navy was concerned both about the stability of 40 year old powder , and that with Modern Era 1,900 lb projectiles , performance wasn't optimized . And with 16 inch bbls essentially being irreplaceable, bore erosion was a priority .

    Indian Head was assigned the problem circa 1994 ( at least that was when technical paper was released) , with assist from Dahlgren.

    *************************

    It was cost prohibitive to develope a new powder from scratch, so Indian Head dug into all the powders that Army uses for heavy artillery , and found a current production one that was improvement over D839 and D846 , that was M31A1E1 .

    839 & 846 were single base. M31A1E1 is Tripple base, with slightly more energy per g , and slightly lower flame temperature.

    Certain amount of Certain thickness copper sheets placed between 1st & 2nd powder bags to reduce copper fouling .

    1 inch thick polymer sheet around each powder bag . ( Or was that inside the bagging material, but around the circumference of the actual powder ? It's in the 19 page pdf ) . As the polymer melts , it absorbs enough energy in the melting , to significantly reduce throat erosion.
     

    Bullfrog

    Ultimate Member
    Oct 8, 2009
    15,323
    Carroll County
    The story was part of the news feeds that scroll across my computer.

    If it's false, again, the Mods can trash the thread.

    It's false. Stupidly false. No offense intended to OP at all, just to whoever wrote the clickbait article or reposted an old one.

    The New Jersey is going into drydock for restoration/preservation work on her hull, that's probably why they are currently attracting attention.


    The Iowas are manpower intensive, and the Navy, like all services, are short on manning right now.

    It takes 300 people to crew an Arleigh Burke, and approximately 2900 to crew an Iowa.

    Would you lay up 18 destroyers to free up the personnel to man 2 80+ year old battleships? And then spend years training them on obsolete equipment and on getting the battleships back in service?

    Even if you grant that they were partially modernized in the 80's, that was now 44 years ago. They have no modern defensive or offensive capabilities.

    They are outstanding for shore bombardment, in a defended environment, but they are completely outclassed now at any other task.
     

    AlBeight

    Member
    MDS Supporter
    Mar 30, 2017
    4,525
    Hampstead
    See post #9. Black powder is also used in many other munitions as an igniter to facilitate the initiation of the main charge. One common example is in the 155 mm howitzer.
    B-Black powder?

    I don’t care what post #9 says, continually writing the word black with two b’s? Just having some fun.

    Reading comprehension my friend, reading comprehension.
     

    boule

    Ultimate Member
    Oct 16, 2008
    1,948
    Galt's Gulch
    They are outstanding for shore bombardment, in a defended environment, but they are completely outclassed now at any other task.
    There is a big discussion on how effective a BB would be in a modern fleet engagement. The main point is - they are heavy hitters but they need to get into their range first. For such a big gun, the Mark 7 has an impressive pattern (250yds CEP @34k yds) but still you need to hit a moving target at sea. It is much easier if you have a fixed target and can pound it with AP shells, not many bunkers that would stand up against repeated hits. Unfortunately, again, you need enough ammo to hit repeatedly and service life of the guns is around 300 rounds.

    The up side of the BBs is their survivability. Most of the current AShM are not designed to pierce armor or at least not that found on a BB and the typical sea-skimming missile would end up in the main armor belt. Even a typical 155mm shell usually does not end up doing too much damage (see "temper temper" incident). Basically, much of the modern stuff dedicated against shipping will do superficial damage only and may end up with a mission kill but is not very likely to sink it.
    The downside - think missile and artillery magnet :-). If you want to sink something, it is the carrier or the BB (morale) and the BB needs to get close to shore in order to fulfill its mission. Once close enough, there will be a bunch of anti-tank stuff thrown in the general direction and not to say what mines and torpedos can do to the ship.

    After all the developments since WW2, a BB has become a one-trick pony. It can do shore bombardment like no one else and take much that can be thrown its way but anything else can be accomplished by much smaller units at a much cheaper cost. So far, the US Navy has not brought them back.
    The replacement for shore bombardment - the Zumwalt-Class "Advanced Gun System"........ please do not fire it for it launches significant chunks of budget at the enemy.



    See post #9. Black powder is also used in many other munitions as an igniter to facilitate the initiation of the main charge. One common example is in the 155 mm howitzer.
    Not necessarily, or shall I say: depends
    The M119A2 charge uses half an ounce of black powder source
    Newer propellants come in different shapes and sizes and differ in their ignition system source
     

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Latest posts

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    275,603
    Messages
    7,288,045
    Members
    33,487
    Latest member
    Mikeymike88

    Latest threads

    Top Bottom