SB1 (2023) - Criminal Law - Wearing, Carrying, or Transporting Firearms - Restrictions (Gun Safety Act of 2023)

[Mark75H]

Doesn't mean it's not true, but I don't remember hearing anything about this. (The Baltimore portion you're referring to)
Anyone else hear about this or is this misinformation from US Concealed Carry?

Pretty certain it is just US CC misinformation. They have NEVER had all the correct info on MD laws

 

[rbird7282]

Pretty certain it is just US CC misinformation. They have NEVER had all the correct info on MD laws

That was my guess


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Threeband]

From attending the below yesterday. It's pretty much going to be unlawful except where posted. And apparently even specific prohibited places like all schools, day care and medical facilities...won't matter if they have this sign, still wouldn't be legal to carry. Looks like any place with a liquor license will be off limits as well, even if you're in a restaurant and not drinking.

Inform the owners of any establishment you support to start posting these signs and also complain to their lawmakers. No sign, no sale.

So were they claiming that the law requires this exact sign design? Sounds like B.S.

I don't think there is anything specific in the law about the design, the wording, the size, the placement, or the prominence of the sign.

Is there any solid information to the contrary?

 

[Bob A]

So were they claiming that the law requires this exact sign design? Sounds like B.S.

I don't think there is anything specific in the law about the design, the wording, the size, the placement, or the prominence of the sign.

Is there any solid information to the contrary?

That design is deliberately made to terrify MD customers and convince business owners that it's a really bad idea.

 

[Chat-Bot]

Doesn't mean it's not true, but I don't remember hearing anything about this. (The Baltimore portion you're referring to)
Anyone else hear about this or is this misinformation from US Concealed Carry?

It was one of the lawyers answering questions from an audience of about 150 and stated he wasn't associated with them. Already knew most of the information from SB1 text but wanted to listen to the presentation which was worthwhile.

The sign was an example of what they had and never mentioned this was THE lawful sign.

Noticed haters of that org here thanks to a select few. And from the sound of many here, they're too terrified to go into Baltimore so who cares?

 

[rbird7282]

It was one of the lawyers answering questions from an audience of about 150 and stated he wasn't associated with them. Already knew most of the information from SB1 text but wanted to listen to the presentation which was worthwhile.

The sign was an example of what they had and never mentioned this was THE lawful sign.

Noticed haters of that org here thanks to a select few. And from the sound of many here, they're too terrified to go into Baltimore so who cares?

So Baltimore is simply saying they will enforce the law as that is the penalty in SB1.
EBMD


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Threeband]

... The sign was an example of what they had and never mentioned this was THE lawful sign.

...

There is no "lawful sign."

That design is deliberately made to terrify MD customers and convince business owners that it's a really bad idea.

Obviously. That is a fake sign, sensationalized in order to manipulate the viewer. It makes me wonder who the seminar organizers are trying to manipulate.

Anyway, that's the point I was getting at. There is no "lawful sign" in Maryland.

Texas has what they call a 30-06 sign, which is a "No Guns" sign with specific wording, size, and placement. Only an exact 30-06 sign, displayed in a specific manner, has any legal force. Apparently 30-06 signs are uncommon there.

Maryland is doing the reverse of most states, by requiring permission to carry. Instead of thumbing their noses at the Supreme Court, Maryland is actually mooning it. Hopefully Maryland will get a good spanking... eventually.

In the meantime, there simply is no legal standard for a "Permission To Carry" sign. Like so many points of the law, it is undefined. That means it would have to be argued in court.

Before it could get to that point - a defense lawyer and a prosecutor presenting their arguments before a judge and a jury - there are a lot of intermediate steps that would have to occur.

I really doubt there will ever be a legal decision defining what counts as "permission to carry."

We're still waiting for a definition of "Bona Fide Collector."

 

[eruby]

So Baltimore is simply saying they will enforce the law as that is the penalty in SB1.
EBMD

To quote Isaac Hayes, in The Theme From Shaft: "You're damn right"

 

[RFBfromDE]

Where the law is ambiguous, let your heart and conscience be your guide.

CMC.

 

[Jimgoespewpew]

Where the law is ambiguous, let your heart and conscience be your guide.

CMC.

Or your constitutional rights

 

[eruby]

Where the law is ambiguous, let your heart and conscience be your guide.

CMC.

Jimminy Cricket approves

 

[Deep Lurker]

I don’t know about you, but that gal in the pic below in front of the U.S. Supreme Court looks like a troublemaker to me.

The photographer is too, they say …

Apparently they both hang out with a bad crowd on occasion. Usually big occasions.

Maybe a doctor here could diagnose whether or not that personality type is innate to their constitution … you know, something natural, or if it is a learned behavior.

Either way, it spells trouble.

Alabama Woman Opens Fire, Repels Home Invader Before He Torched Her Home - The Truth About Guns

&#9664Previous Post Next Post▶ Much is being made of the US v. Rahimi the Supreme Court case that’s set for oral arguments on November 7. If you listen to the media and the gun control industry, you’d think the case is about making America safe for domestic abusers and subjugating women. Or...

www.thetruthaboutguns.com

 

[eruby]

I don’t know about you, but that gal in the pic below in front of the U.S. Supreme Court looks like a troublemaker to me.

The photographer is too, they say …

Apparently they both hang out with a bad crowd on occasion. Usually big occasions.

Maybe a doctor here could diagnose whether or not that personality type is innate to their constitution … you know, something natural, or if it is a learned behavior.

Either way, it spells trouble.

 

[teratos]

I don’t know about you, but that gal in the pic below in front of the U.S. Supreme Court looks like a troublemaker to me.

The photographer is too, they say …

Apparently they both hang out with a bad crowd on occasion. Usually big occasions.

Maybe a doctor here could diagnose whether or not that personality type is innate to their constitution … you know, something natural, or if it is a learned behavior.

Either way, it spells trouble.

Alabama Woman Opens Fire, Repels Home Invader Before He Torched Her Home - The Truth About Guns

&#9664Previous Post Next Post▶ Much is being made of the US v. Rahimi the Supreme Court case that’s set for oral arguments on November 7. If you listen to the media and the gun control industry, you’d think the case is about making America safe for domestic abusers and subjugating women. Or...

www.thetruthaboutguns.com

View attachment 434623

Definitely looks like trouble. I’d say her behavior is learned. I’d bet she spends a good deal of time with ruffians.

 

[RFBfromDE]

First “Florida Man”

Now “Alabama Woman”

 

[Occam]

The photographer is too, they say …

 

[knovotny]

Hahaha! Love you guys! Looking forward to the next time we get to hang out there and be scallywags and ruffians!

 

[teratos]

Hahaha! Love you guys! Looking forward to the next time we get to hang out there and be scallywags and ruffians!

Well…we love you. No, uh, hetero? I dunno. Hubby might have guns.

 

[Phoenix_1295]

Stop Pretending - It's Not the "Fungibility," It's the Location of the $6 Billion Returned to Iran - The Last Refuge

You want to go deep weeds, let’s go deep weeds. Almost all of the conversations about the $6 billion given back to Iran have focused on the fungible aspect of money. While true, that focus misses the key and essential point, where the money was delivered. The captured $6 billion was held in a...

theconservativetreehouse.com

I think you posted in wrong thread.

 

[BeoBill]

I think you posted in wrong thread.

OOPS! You're right...