SB 1 - Dont’s

[swinokur]

Strictly prohibited has no more force of law than prohibited.

It just sounds more authoritarian

 

[Phoenix_1295]

That's nice, currently has no force of law.

True.

 

[Biggfoot44]

Is there a difference between "strictly prohibited" and simply "prohibited"? Always bothered me.

Probably no , sometimes sort of yes .

No difference in legal status .

* Probably * new signs or new text in websites will default to prior practices quickly .

But if they were motivated to indulge security theater , they could refuse admittance/ eject patrons by quasi TSA magnitude over nail clippers and tweasers .

 

[lazarus]

Someone mentioned something about it being city property. Doesn't the city ban carry in all of its buildings under local ordinance? B'more carry restrictions are grandfathered in last I checked.

 

[Doctor_M]

I ran into SB1 yesterday and I told it that its father was a hamster and its mother smelled of elderberries... then I farted in its general direction.

 

[eruby]

I ran into SB1 yesterday and I told it that its father was a hamster and its mother smelled smelt of elderberries... then I farted in its general direction.

Yes, yes, my life is tiny, and pathetic

 

[Lafayette]

Someone mentioned something about it being city property. Doesn't the city ban carry in all of its buildings under local ordinance? B'more carry restrictions are grandfathered in last I checked.

Doesn’t Section 59-5(d) of the Baltimore ordinances provide an exception under the state statute 4-203(b)? Or did I read it wrong?

(d) Exceptions. This section does not prohibit the wearing, carrying, or transporting of a handgun by a person covered by an exemption in State Criminal Law Article 4-203(b).

 

[Doctor_M]

Yes, yes, my life is tiny, and pathetic

I'm always honored to be corrected by the Pope!

 

[dblas]

I have also had a long day and am cranky. No hard feelings.

TD

Dude, never hard feelings. We rag on each other and then we have a beer at the next get together. You and I have been here long enough to have the skin needed to be here as long as we have.
Hope you had a better day, next get together you and I are at, first round is mine.

 

[dblas]

Is there a difference between "strictly prohibited" and simply "prohibited"? Always bothered me.

None.

 

[Occam]

Is there a difference between "strictly prohibited" and simply "prohibited"? Always bothered me.

 

[Blacksmith101]

Is there a difference between "strictly prohibited" and simply "prohibited"? Always bothered me.

Similar to the difference between "Probation" and "Double Secret Probation".

Link:

 

[miles71]

Dude, never hard feelings. We rag on each other and then we have a beer at the next get together. You and I have been here long enough to have the skin needed to be here as long as we have.
Hope you had a better day, next get together you and I are at, first round is mine.

Deal

 

[lazarus]

Doesn’t Section 59-5(d) of the Baltimore ordinances provide an exception under the state statute 4-203(b)? Or did I read it wrong?

Oh. That does seem to apply I’d think

 

[lazarus]

View attachment 448749

I was thinking it was more like the difference between being bad and being naughty.

Like one earns a spanking. And the other earns a spanking I’d like.

 

[coinboy]

You stated "Yes it is defined in the new lesson plans for instructors. I will have to look to find the law but museums are off limits."

The new lesson plan does not equal 4-111.

And while museum is indeed in the statute, a definition is not and again, which what the question was, and my answer to.

If you open a firearms museum, carry is not permitted there. It's not that hard, the new laws do not ban firearms, they ban the carry and transport of firearms in certain areas.

Okay, I'll bite.

So say someone opens a firearms museum and obtains historically significant pieces of both handguns and rifles to display in said museum, how do they transport them to the said museum?

Moreover, if they change a display and move firearms to other areas to make room for the new ones, wouldn't they be technically open carrying them to said new location of the museum?

 

[dblas]

Okay, I'll bite.

So say someone opens a firearms museum and obtains historically significant pieces of both handguns and rifles to display in said museum, how do they transport them to the said museum?

Moreover, if they change a display and move firearms to other areas to make room for the new ones, wouldn't they be technically open carrying them to said new location of the museum?

There is an exemption written into the law for all of that.

 

[coinboy]

There is an exemption written into the law for all of that.