SAF Issued file new law suit challenging common semiautomatic rifle ban

[Allen65]

This is where the rubber meets the road. We will now see how the lower courts react to the SCOUS's rulings.

Let the games begin!!



.

Sent from my SM-G781U using Tapatalk

I think most courts will go along with the changes with no problems. 5,6,8,10,11, and probably 4CA will probably transition smoothly for the most part. The outliers will almost certainly be the ones who have been problem children all along: 2, 3, and of course, 9CA. But a few per curiams should eventually knock them into line after a couple of years.

And Henderson in DC Circuit will probably need a personal visit from Justice Thomas with a taser somewhere along the line.

 

[whistlersmother]

This is where the rubber meets the road. We will now see how the lower courts react to the SCOUS's rulings.

Let the games begin!!



.

Sent from my SM-G781U using Tapatalk

In Bruen, Thomas was, IMHO, gentle with judges in that he suggested they were not really guided with the immediate scrutiny and that Bruen set matters straight.

I personally think judges were looking for any reason to uphold anti-2A laws.

We shall see what integrity lower court judges actually have.

My take is that they are part of the government and would not rule to potentially give people the means to overthrow the apple cart.

 

[Kharn]

GVR in light of NYSRPA v Bruen

 

[KIBarrister]

GVR in light of NYSRPA v Bruen View attachment 371028

I came here to post this, but in my heart I knew it had already been done.

The dicta in NYSRPA really should make this a cut and dry death blow to FSA 2013. Of course, it won't. But, maybe next session the justices will set them straight [again].

 

[JohnMD1022]

Go to the CA4 with what? An argument that has already been decided by CA4 and rejected by SCOTUS? We already know what that answer is. Why do we need to learn the same thing again?

Because the Supreme Court has changed.

 

[teratos]

I came here to post this, but in my heart I knew it had already been done.

The dicta in NYSRPA really should make this a cut and dry death blow to FSA 2013. Of course, it won't. But, maybe next session the justices will set them straight [again].

The writing is on the wall, legibly, in large rainbow letters in honor of pride month.

 

[Deep Thought]

The writing is on the wall, legibly, in large rainbow letters in honor of pride month.

Best pride month ever.

 

[DC-W]

 

[DC-W]

 

[Nobody]

So an answer from 4th in two weeks?

Nobody

 

[Occam]

So an answer from 4th in two weeks?

It depends. Is the 4th's building in a cul-de-sac? Is any of this based on the writings of Anitmony Scalia?

 

[delaware_export]

Give’m hell MSI!

 

[DC-W]

Give’m hell MSI!

Not an MSI case. MSI got a bite at the FSA in Kolbe, but lost.

Res judicata

www.law.cornell.edu

 

[jcutonilli]

Because the Supreme Court has changed.

But it is likely going back to the District Court to find facts about history. It is the same starting point as if a new case is filed today. Tens of thousands of dollars in legal expenses were incurred for nothing.

 

[Allen65]

So will there be a new set of briefs and hearings, or can the court just go straight to redeciding with the new THT standard?

 

[DC-W]

FPC's Coffee with Craig discuss where things go with Bianchi v. Frosh.

 

[chilipeppermaniac]

Seems we will likely see GVRs, and not per curiams in the next orders list.

English

 

[Inigoes]

English

That we would see a smack down and not an epic smack down

We got the run of the mill smack down, when all 4 cases being held were GVR'd.

 

[DC-W]

English

Watch the video I just posted above.

 

[chilipeppermaniac]

Watch the video I just posted above.

Thanks DC, Yup I was mid view and now see your post#179